This comparative study examines relationships between phonemic awareness and Spanish reading skill acquisition among three groups of Spanish-speaking first and second graders: children in Mexico receiving reading instruction in Spanish and children in the United States receiving reading instruction in either Spanish or English. Children were tested on Spanish oral language and reading skills in fall and spring of Grades 1 and 2. Children in Mexico were the lowest in phonemic awareness among the three groups and very low in their entering first-grade reading skills. However, they ended second grade matching or surpassing the reading skills of the U.S. students while remaining lower in phonemic awareness. Findings cast doubt on whether phonemic awareness instruction is helpful for children learning to read in Spanish.
AdamsM. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AnthonyJ. L.LoniganC. J. (2004). The nature of phonological awareness: Converging evidence from four studies of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 43–55.
3.
AugustD.ShanahanT. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Branum-MartinL.FletcherJ. M.CarlsonC. D.OrtizA.CarloM.FrancisD. J. (2006). Bilingual phonological awareness: Multilevel construct validation among Spanish-speaking kindergarteners in transitional bilingual education classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 170–181.
5.
Branum-MartinL.MehtaP. D.FrancisD. J.FoormanB. R.CirinoP. T.MillerJ. F.IglesiasA. (2009). Picture and words: Spanish and English vocabulary in classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 897–911.
6.
California Department of Education. (2007). Reading/language arts framework for California public schools. Sacramento, CA: Author.
7.
CarreirasM.AlvarezC.de VegaM. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766–780.
8.
CarreirasM.PereaM. (2004). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language, 90, 393–400.
9.
ConradM.JacobsA. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 369–390.
10.
EhriL.NunesS.WillowsD.SchusterB.V.Yaghoub-ZadehZ.ShanahanT. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.
11.
FerreiroE. (1991). La construcción de la escritura en el niño [The construction of writing in the child]. Lectura y vida, Revista Latinoamericana de Lectura, 12(3), 5–14.
12.
FerreiroE.PontecorvoC.Ribeiro MoreiraN.García HidalgoI. (1996). Caperucita Roja aprende a escribir [Little Red Ridinghood learns to write]. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa.
13.
FerreiroE.TeberoskyA. (1982). Literacy before schooling. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14.
FoormanB. R.GoldenbergC.CarlsonC.SaundersW.Pollard-DurodolaS. D. (2004). How teachers allocate time during literacy instruction in primary-grade bilingual classrooms. In McCardleP.ChhabraV. (Eds.), The voice of evidence: Bringing research to the classroom (pp. 289–328). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.
15.
FoormanB. R.SchatschneiderC. (2003). Measurement of teaching practices during reading/language arts instruction and its relationship to student achievement. In VaughnS.BriggsK. L. (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for the observation of teaching and learning (pp. 1–30). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
16.
FoormanB. R.SchatschneiderC.EakinM. N.FletcherJ. M.MoatsL. C.FrancisD. J. (2006). The impact of instructional practices in grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 1–29.
GeneseeF. (Ed.). (1999). Program alternatives for linguistically diverse students (Educational Practice Report No. 1). Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence.
19.
GeneseeF.Lindholm-LearyK.SaundersW.ChristianD. (2006). Educating English language learners. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GonzálezJ. (1997). A reading-level match study of phonemic processes underlying reading disabilities in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 23–40.
21.
GoswamiU. (1999). The relationship between phonological awareness and orthographic representation in different orthographies. In HarrisM.HatanoG. (Eds.). Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 134–156). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HoganT.CattsH.LittleT. (2005). The relationship between phonological awareness and reading: Implications for the assessment of phonological awareness. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 285–293.
23.
HorstM.BoulayB.UnluF. (2008). Reading First Impact Study Final Report (NCEE 2009-4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
24.
HueyE. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York, NY: Macmillan.
25.
JiménezR. T.SmithP. H.Martínez-LeónN. (2003). Freedom and form: The language and literacy practices of two Mexican schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 488-508.
26.
MasseyD.AlarcónR.DurandJ.GonzálezH. (1987). Return to Aztlan: The social process of international migration from Western Mexico. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Alphabetics Part II: Phonics instruction (Chapter 2) in Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the Subgroups. Rockville, MD: NICHD Clearinghouse.
OneyB.DurgunogluA. (1997). Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 1–15.
30.
ReeseL.Mejía ArauzR.Ray BazánA. (2012). Mexican parents’ and teachers’ literacy perspectives and practices: Construction of cultural capital. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25, 983–1003.
31.
SEP. (1993). Plan y programas de estudio, 1993 [Study plan and programs, 1993]. México: Secretaría de Educación Pública.
32.
SEP. (2000). Programas de estudio de Español Educación primaria [Spanish study guides, Elementary education]. México: Subsecretaría de Educción Básica y Normal.
SignoriniA. (1998). La conciencia fonológica y la lectura. Teoría e investigación acerca de una relación compleja [Phonological awareness and reading. Theory and research about a complex relation]. Lectura y vida, 19(3), 15–22.
35.
SpencerL.HanleyJ. (2003). Effects of orthographic transparency on reading and phoneme awareness in children learning to read in Wales. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 1–28.
36.
StanovichK. (1987). Introduction (invitational issue on children’s reading and the development of phonological awareness). Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, iii–vi.
37.
StanovichK. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York, NY: Guilford.
38.
StoneC.SillimanE.EhrenB.ApelK. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of language and literacy. New York, NY: Guilford.
39.
Tanck de EstradaD. (1998) La enseñanza de la lectura y de la escritura en la Nueva España 1700-1821 [The teaching of reading and writing in the New Spain 1700-1821]. In Seminario de Historia de la Educación en México (Ed.), Historia de la lectura en México. México, DF: El Colegio de México.
40.
Texas Education Agency. (2008). Chapter 128. Texas essential knowledge and skills for Spanish language arts and reading and English as a second language; Subchapter A. Elementary. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter128/index.html.
TroiaG. (1999). Phonological awareness intervention research: A critical review of the experimental methodology. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 28–52.
43.
TroiaG. (2004). Phonological processing and its influence on literacy learning. In StoneC.SillimanE.EhrenB.ApelK. (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy (pp. 271–301). New York, NY: Guilford.
VernonS. (2004). ¿Qué tanto es un pedacito? El análisis que los niños hacen de las partes de la palabra. In Pellicer, y Sofía Vernon. Aprender y enseñar la lengua escrita en el aula (pp. 19–40). México: Ediciones SM.
46.
VernonS.FerreiroE. (1999). Writing development: A neglected variable in the consideration of phonological awareness. Harvard Educational Review, 69, 395–415.
47.
WagnerR.TorgesenJ.RashotteC. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
48.
WimmerH.GoswamiU. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91–103.
