Mathematics Recovery (MR) is designed to identify first graders who are struggling in mathematics and provide them with intensive one-to-one tutoring. We report findings from a 2-year evaluation of MR conducted in 20 elementary schools across five districts in two states. The design allowed for the estimation of the counterfactual growth trajectory based on those students randomly assigned either to a tutoring cohort with a delayed start or to a wait list. Results demonstrate strong end of first grade effects on a diagnostic measure developed by MR and weak to moderate effects (effect size, .15–.30) on measures administered by external evaluators. By the end of second grade, no significant effects were found on any measures. Practical and research implications are discussed.
AlexanderK. L.EntwistleD. R. (1998). Achievement in the first two years of school: Patterns and processes. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 53(Serial No. 218).
2.
AubreyC.DahlS.GodfreyR. (2006). Early mathematics development and later achievement: Further evidence. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(1), 27–46.
3.
AunolaK.LeskinenE.LerkkanenM. K.NurmiJ. E. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performance from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 699–713.
4.
BaroodyA. J. (1987). The development of counting strategies for single-digit addition. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 141–157.
5.
BaroodyA. J. (1990). How and when should place-value concepts and skills be taught?Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 281–286.
6.
BaroodyA. J.GinsburgH. P. (1986). The relationship between initial meaningful and mechanical knowledge of arithmetic. In HiebertJ. (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 75–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
BaroodyA. J.TiilikainenS. H. (2003). Two perspectives on addition development. In BaroodyA. J.DowkerA. (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 75–125). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
8.
BartonP. E. (2003). Parsing the achievement gap: Baselines for tracking progress. Princeton, NJ: ETS
9.
BeishuizenM. (1993). Mental strategies and materials or models for addition and subtraction up to 100 in Dutch second grades. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 294–323.
10.
BerendsM.LucasS. R.SullivanT.BriggsR. J. (2005). Examining gaps in mathematics achievement among racial-ethnic groups, 1972–1992. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
11.
BurchP. (2007). Supplemental education services under NCLB: Emerging evidence and policy issues. East Lansing, MI: The Great Lakes Center for Education Research & Practice.
12.
CarpenterT. P.FrankeM. L.JacobsV. R.FennemaE.EmpsonS. B. (1997). A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children’s multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 3–20.
13.
CarpenterT. P.MoserJ .M. (1982). The development of addition and subtraction problem solving skills. In CarpenterT. P.MoserJ. M.RombergT. A. (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 9–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
CarpenterT. P.MoserJ. M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 179–202.
15.
ChiM. T. H.SilerS. A.JeongH.YamauchiT.HausmannR. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471–533.
16.
ClementsD. H. (1999). Subitizing: What is it? Why teach it?Teaching Children Mathematics, 5, 400–405.
17.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the Building Blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 136–163.
18.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2012). Early childhood mathematics intervention. Science, 333, 968–970.
19.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.SpitlerM. E.WolfeC. B.LangeA. A. (2011, March). Longitudinal evaluation of a scale-up model for teaching math with trajectories and technologies: Persistence of effect in the third year. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Washington, DC.
20.
CobbP.GravemeijerK.YackelE.McClainK.WhitenackJ. (1997). Mathematizing and symbolizing: The emergence of chains of signification in one first-grade classroom. In KirshnerD.WhitsonJ. A. (Eds.), Situated cognition theory: Social, semiotic, and neurological perspectives (pp. 151–233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
CohenP. A.KulikJ. A.KulikC. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237–248.
23.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
24.
CrosnoeR. (2005). Double disadvantage or signs of resilience? The elementary school contexts of children from Mexican immigrant families. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 269–303.
25.
D’AgostinoJ.MurphyJ. (2004). A meta-analysis of Reading Recovery in United States schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 23–38.
26.
DerryS. J.PottsM. K. (1998). How tutors model students: A study of personal constructs in adaptive tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 65–99.
DusenburyL.BranniganR.FalcoM.HansenW. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 28, 237–256.
29.
FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.PaulsenK.BryantJ. D.HamlettC. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493–513.
30.
FusonK. C. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of number. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
31.
FusonK. C. (1992). Learning addition and subtraction: Effects of number words and other cultural tools. In BideaudJ.MeljacC.FischerJ. P. (Eds.), Pathways to number: Children’s developing numerical abilities (pp. 283–306). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
FusonK. C.WearneD.HiebertJ.HumanP.OlivierA.CarpenterT.. . . FennemaE. (1997). Children’s conceptual structure for multidigit numbers and methods of multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 130–162.
33.
GriffinS.CaseR. (1999). Re-thinking the primary school math curriculum: An approach based on cognitive science. Issues in Education, 3(1), 1–49.
34.
HiebertJ.WearneD. (1992). Links between teaching and learning place value with understanding in first grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 98–122.
35.
HoussartJ. (2001). Counting difficulties at Key Stage 2. Support for Learning, 16, 11–16.
36.
HurryJ.SylvaK. (2007). Long term outcomes of early reading intervention. Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 227–248.
37.
KeoghB. K.MajorS. M.ReidH. P.GandaraP.OmoriH. (1978). Marker variables: A search of comparability and generalizability in the field of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1(Summer), 5–11.
38.
LeshR.KellyA. E. (1997). Teachers’ evolving conceptions of one-to-one tutoring: A three-tiered teaching experiment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 398–430.
39.
MacLeanH. E. (2003). The effects of early intervention on the mathematical achievement of low-performing first grade students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Houston, Houston, TX.
40.
McArthurD.StaszC.ZmuidzinasM. (1990). Tutoring techniques in algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 197–244.
41.
McWayneC. M.FantuzzoJ. W.McDermottP. A. (2004). Preschool competency in context: An investigation of the unique contribution of child competencies to early academic success. Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 633–645.
42.
MosherF. A. (2011). The role of learning progressions in standards-based education reform (CPRE Policy Brief). Philadelphia, PA: CPRE.
43.
MunterC. (2010). Evaluating Math Recovery: The impact of implementation fidelity on student outcomes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
44.
OakesJ. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effect of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
45.
O’DonnellC. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33–84.
46.
PhillipsV. J.LeonardW. H.HortonR. M.WrightR. J.StaffordA. K. (2003). Can Math Recovery save children before they fail?Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(2), 107–111.
47.
PrinciottaD.FlanaganK. D.Germino HauskenE. (2006). Fifth grade: Findings from the fifth-grade follow-up of the early childhood longitudinal study, kindergarten class of 1998-99 (ECLS-K) (NCES 2006-038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
48.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
49.
RitterG. W.BarnettJ. H.DennyG. S.AlbinG. R. (2009). The effectiveness of volunteer tutoring programs for elementary and middle school students: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 3–38.
50.
RolfhusE.GerstenR.ClarkeB.DeckerL.WilkinsC.DiminoJ. (2012). An evaluation of Number Rockets: A Tier 2 intervention for grade 1 students at risk for difficulties in mathematics (NCEE 2012-4007). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
51.
SaramaJ.ClementsD. H.WolfeC. B.SpitlerM. E. (2011, April). Longitudinal evaluation of a scale-up model for teaching mathematics with trajectories and technologies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of AERA, New Orleans, LA.
52.
SchmidtW. H.McKnightC. C.CoganL. S.JakwerthP. M.HouangR. T. (2002). Facing the consequences: Using TIMSS for a closer look at the United States mathematics and science education (eBook ed.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
53.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2002). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
54.
SlavinR. E.LakeC. (2006). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education.
55.
StarkeyP.KleinA. (2005). A longitudinal study of the effects of a pre-kindergarten mathematics curriculum on low-income children’s mathematical knowledge (From PCER 2002: Grantee Annual Progress Report (2005), IES Grant No. R305J020026). Berkeley: University of California.
56.
SteffeL. P.CobbP.von GlasersfeldE. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
57.
SteffeL. P.von GlasersfeldE.RichardsJ. J.CobbP. (1983). Children’s counting types: Philosophy, theory and application. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
58.
StevensonH. W.NewmanR. S. (1986). Long-term prediction of achievement and attitudes in mathematics and reading. Child Development, 57, 646–659.
59.
TangE. P.GinsburgH. P. (1999). Young children’s mathematical reasoning: A psychological view. In Developing mathematical reasining in grades K–12: 1999 yearbook (pp. 45–61). Reston, VA: NCTM.
60.
WagnerS. (2005). PRIME: PRompt Intervention in Mathematics Education: Executive summary of research and programs. Columbus, OH: Ohio Resource Center for Mathematics, Science, and Reading & Ohio Department of Education.
61.
WasikB. A.SlavinR. E. (1993). Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 178–200.
62.
WilmsJ. D. (1986). Social class segregation and its relationship to pupils’ examination results in Scotland. American Sociological Review, 51, 224–241.
WrightR. J. (1991). What number knowledge is possessed by children beginning the kindergarten year of school?Mathematics Education Research Journal, 3(1), 1–16.
65.
WrightR. J. (1994). A study of the numerical development of 5-year-olds and 6-year-olds. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(1), 25–44.
66.
WrightR. J. (2003). Mathematics Recovery: A program of intervention in early number. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8(4), 6–11.
67.
WrightR. J.MartlandJ.StaffordA. K. (2000). Early numeracy: Assessment for teaching and intervention. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
68.
WrightR. J.MartlandJ.StaffordA. K.StangerG. (2002). Teaching Number: Advancing children’s skills and strategies. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
69.
VanLehnK.SilerS.MurrayC.YamauchiT.BaggettW. B. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring?Cognition and Instruction, 21, 209–249.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
