Validating the structure of informal numeracy skills is critical to understanding the developmental trajectories of mathematics skills at early ages; however, little research has been devoted to construct evaluation of the Numbering, Relations, and Arithmetic Operations domains. This study was designed to address this knowledge gap by examining the structure of these three numeracy skill domains and examining the relations among these domains. Three hundred ninety-three children participated in the study (51.7% girls, 55.7% White, 33.8% African American, and 10.5% other). Results indicated that the relations among the informal numeracy skills were best explained by a three-factor model that included Numbering, Relations, and Arithmetic Operations factors, and this factor structure was the same in both younger and older preschool children.
ArnoldD. H.FisherP. H.DoctoroffG. L.DobbsJ. (2002). Accelerating math development in Head Start Classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 762–770.
2.
AunioP.NiemivirtaM. (2010). Predicting children’s mathematical performance in grade one by early numeracy. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 427–435.
3.
AunioP.NiemivirtaM.HautomakiJ.Van LuitJ. E. H.ShiJ.ZhangM. (2006). Young children’s number sense in China and Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50, 483–502.
4.
AunolaK.LeskinenE.LerkkanenM.NurmiJ. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performances from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 699–713.
5.
BaroodyA. J. (2004). The developmental bases for early childhood number and operations. In ClementsD.SaramaJ.DiBiaseA. M. (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 173–219). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
BaroodyA. J.GannonK. E.BerentR.GinsburgH. P. (1984). The development of basic formal mathematics abilities. Acta Paedologica, 1, 133–150.
7.
BerchD. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 333–339.
8.
BryantD. P.BryantB. R.KimS. A.GerstenR. (2006, February). Three-tier mathematics intervention: Emerging model and preliminary findings. Poster presented at the 14th annual meeting of the Pacific Coast Research Conference, San Diego, CA.
9.
BullR.EspyK. A.WiebeS. A. (2008). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 205–228.
10.
ChardD. J.ClarkeB.BakerS.OtterstedtJ.BraunD.KatzR. (2005). Using measures of number sense to screen for difficulties in mathematics: Preliminary findings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 3–14.
11.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the Building Blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 136–163.
12.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.LiuX. (2008). Development of a measure of early mathematics achievement using the Rasch model: The Research-based Early Math Assessment. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 457–482.
13.
ConfreyJ.SmithE. (1995). Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 66–86.
14.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.. . . JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446.
15.
FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.HollenbeckK. N.CraddockC. F.HamlettC. L. (2008). Dynamic assessment of algebraic learning in predicting third graders’ development of mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 829–850.
16.
FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.PaulsenK.BryantJ. D.HamlettC. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493–513.
17.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CapizziA. M.. . . FletcherJ. M. (2006). The cognitive correlates of third-grade skill in arithmetic, algorithmic computation, and arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 29–43.
18.
FuchsL. S.GearyD. C.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.SeethalerP. M.. . . SchatschneiderC. (2010). Do different types of school mathematics development depend on different constellations of numerical versus general cognitive abilities?Developmental Psychology, 46, 1731–1746.
19.
GearyD. C. (1994). Children’s mathematical development: Research and practical applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20.
GearyD. C.Bow-ThomasC. C.YaoY. (1992). Counting knowledge and skill in cognitive addition: A comparison of normal and mathematically disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 372–391.
21.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
22.
GerstenR.ClarkeB.MazzoccoM. M. M. (2007). Historical and contemporary perspectives on mathematical learning disabilities. In BerchD.MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities. (pp. 7–27). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing.
23.
GinsburgH. P.BaroodyA. J. (2003). Test of early mathematics ability (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
24.
GinsburgH. P.KleinA.StarkeyP. (1998). The development of children’s mathematical thinking: Connecting research with practice. In WilliamsD.SigelI. E.RenningerK. (Eds), Child psychology in practice. (pp. 401–476). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
25.
GonzalesP.CalsynC.JocelynL.MakK.KastbergD.ArafehS.. . . TsenW. (2000). Pursuing excellence: Comparisons of international eighth-grade mathematics and science achievement from a U.S. perspective, 1995 and 1999 (NCES 2001–028). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26.
GreenesC.GinsburgH. P.BalfanzR. (2004). Big math for little kids. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 159–166.
27.
GriffinS. (2004). Building number sense with Number Worlds: A mathematics program for young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 173–180.
28.
GriffinS.CaseR. (1997). Re-thinking the primary school math curriculum: An approach based on cognitive science. Issues in Education, 2, 1–49.
29.
HolmesJ.AdamsJ. W. (2006). Working memory and children’s mathematical skills: Implications for mathematical development and mathematical curricula. Educational Psychology, 26, 339–366.
30.
HowellS.KempC. (2005). Defining early number sense: A participatory Australian study. Educational Psychology, 25, 555–571.
31.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
32.
JordanN. C.KaplanD.OlahL. N.LocuniakM. N. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77, 153–175.
33.
JordanN. C.KaplanD.RamineniC.LocuniakM. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 850–867.
34.
KalchmanM.MossJ.CaseR. (2001). Psychological models for the development of mathematical understanding: Rational numbers and functions. In CarverS.KlahrD. (Eds.), Cognition and instruction (pp. 1–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
KleinA.StarkeyP.IyerR.NishidaT. (2008, March). Development and evaluation of a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention for economically disadvantaged children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research in Educational Effectiveness, Crystal City, VA.
36.
KleinA.StarkeyP.RamirezA. (2002). Pre-K mathematics curriculum. Glendale, IL: Scott Foresman.
37.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
LaiM.BaroodyA. J.JohnsonA. R. (2008). Fostering Taiwanese preschoolers’ understanding of the addition-subtraction inverse principle. Cognitive Development, 23, 216–235.
39.
McKenzieB.BullR.GrayC. (2003). The effects of phonological and visual-spatial inference on children’s arithmetical performance. Educational and Child Psychology, 20, 93–108.
40.
MullisI. V. S.MartinM. O.GonzalezE. J.ChrostowskiS. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the eighth and fourth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
41.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2008a). Mplus 5.1 [Computer program]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
42.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2008b, March). Mplus Short Courses Topic 1—Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling with continuous indicators. Presented during Mplus Short Course Day 1 at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
43.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
44.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through Grade 8 mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
45.
National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: Author.
46.
PurpuraD. J. (2010). Informal number-related mathematics skills: An examination of the structure of and relations between these skills in preschool (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. AAT 3462344)
47.
PurpuraD. J.HumeL.SimsD.LoniganC. J. (2011). Emergent literacy and mathematics: The value of including emergent literacy skills in the prediction of mathematics development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 647–658.
48.
RamaniG. B.SieglerR. S. (2008). Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development, 79, 375–394.
49.
SaramaJ.ClementsD. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
SieglerR. S.RamaniG. B. (2008). Playing linear numerical board games promotes low-income children’s numerical development. Developmental Science, 11, 655–661.
51.
SimonM. A.TzurR. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 91–104.
52.
SophianC. (2004). Mathematics for the future: Developing a Head Start curriculum to support mathematics learning. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 59–81.
53.
StarkeyP.KleinA.WakeleyA. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 99–120.
54.
SteffeL. P. (2004). On the construction of learning trajectories for children: The case of commensurate fractions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 26, 129–162.
55.
StevensonH. W.LeeS.ChenC.LummisM.StiglerJ.FanL.GeF. (1990). Mathematics achievement of children in China and the United States. Child Development, 61, 1053–1066.
56.
SwansonH. L.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 471–491.
57.
SwansonH. L.KimK. (2007). Working memory, short-term memory, and naming speed as predictors of children’s mathematical performance. Intelligence, 35, 151–168.
58.
YuC.-Y. (2002). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/Yudissertation.pdf
59.
van de RijtB. A. M.Van LuitJ. E. H.PenningsA. H. (1999). The construction of the Utrecht Early Mathematical Competence Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 289–309.
60.
van de RijtB.GodfreyR.AubreyC.van LuitJ. E. H.GhesquiËreP.TorbeynsJ.. . . TzouriadouM. (2003). The development of early numeracy in Europe. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 1, 155–180.
