Using data from the National Educational Longitudinal Study, this study revisited rural-nonrural disparities in educational attainment by considering a comprehensive set of factors that constrain and support youth’s college enrollment and degree completion. Results showed that rural students were more advantaged in community social resources compared to nonrural students, and these resources were associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of bachelor’s degree attainment. Yet results confirmed that rural students lagged behind nonrural students in attaining a bachelor’s degree largely due to their lower socioeconomic background. The findings present a more comprehensive picture of the complexity of geographic residence in shaping college enrollment and degree attainment.
AdelmanC.DanielB.BerkovitsI.OwingsJ. (2003). Postsecondary attainment, attendance, curriculum, and performance: Selected results from the NELS:88/2000 postsecondary education transcript study (PETS), 2000 (NCES 2003-394). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
3.
AgrestiA. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
4.
Alliance for Excellent Education. (2010). Current challenges and opportunities in preparing rural high school students for success in college and careers. Washington, DC: Author.
5.
ArnoldM. M.BiscoeB.FarmerT. W.RobertsonD. L.ShapleyK. L. (2007). How the government defines rural has implications for education policies and practices (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 010). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
6.
AttewellP.HeilS.ReiselL. (2011). Competing explanations of undergraduate noncompletion. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 536–559. doi:10.3102/000283121039201810.3102/0002831210392018
7.
BozickR. (2007). Making it through the first year of college: The role of students’ economic resources, employment, and living arrangements. Sociology of Education, 80, 361–385. doi:10.1177/00380407070800030410.1177/003804070708000304
BrownD. L.SchafftK. A. (2011). Rural people and communities in the 21st century. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
10.
ColadarciT. (2007). Improving the yield of rural education research: An editor’s swan song. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 22(3). Retrieved from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/22-3.pdf
11.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), S95–S120. doi:10.1086/22894310.1086/228943
12.
CrockettL. J.ShanahanM. J.Jackson-NewsomJ. (2000). Rural youth: Ecological and life course perspectives. In MontemayorR.AdamsG.GullottaT. (Eds.), Adolescent diversity in ethnic, economic, and cultural contexts: Advances in adolescent development (pp. 43–74). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
CurtinT. R.IngelsS. J.WuS.HeuerR. (2002). National education longitudinal study of 1988: Base-year to fourth follow-up data file manual (NCES 2002-323). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
14.
Deil-AmenR.TurleyR. L. (2007). A review of the transition to college literature in sociology. Teachers College Record, 109, 2324–2366.
15.
DemiM.Coleman-JensenA.SynderA. (2010). The rural context and secondary school enrollment: An ecological systems approach. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 25(7). Retrieved from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/25-7.pdf
16.
ElderG. H.CongerR. D. (2000). Children of the land: Adversity and success in rural America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
FanX.ChenM. J. (1999). Academic achievement in rural school students: A multiyear comparison with their peers in suburban and urban schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 15(1), 31–46.
18.
FloraC. B.FloraJ. L. (2003). Rural communities: Legacy and change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
19.
GibbsR. (1998). College completion and return migration among rural youth. In GibbsR. M.SwaimP. L.TeixeiraR. (Eds.), Rural education and training in the new economy: The myth of the rural skills gap (pp. 61–80). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Goldrick-RabS. (2006). Following their every move: An investigation of social-class differences in college pathways. Sociology of Education, 79, 61–79. doi:10.1177/00380407060790010410.1177/003804070607900104
22.
Goldrick-RabS.CarterD. F.WagnerR. W. (2007). What higher education has to say about the transition to college. Teachers College Record, 109, 2444–2481.
23.
Goldrick-RabS.PfefferT. F. (2009). Beyond access: Explaining socioeconomic differences in college transfer. Sociology of Education, 82(2), 101–125. doi:10.1177/00380407090820020110.1177/003804070908200201
GriffinD.HutchinsB. C.MeeceJ. L. (2011). Where do rural high school students go to find information about their futures?Journal of Counseling & Development, 89, 172–181.
26.
HallerE. J.VirklerS. J. (1993). Another look at rural-nonrural differences in students’ educational aspirations. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 9, 170–178.
27.
HardréP. L.SullivanD. W.CrowsonM. H. (2009). Student characteristics and motivation in rural high schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24(16). Retrieved from http//jrre.psu.edu/articles24-16.pdf
HowleyC. W. (2006). Remote possibilities: Rural children’s educational aspirations. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(2), 62–80. doi:10.1207/S15327930pje8102_410.1207/S15327930pje8102_4
30.
HuS. (2003). Educational aspirations and postsecondary access and choice: Students in urban, suburban, and rural schools compared. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(14). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n14/
31.
IrvinM. J.MeeceJ. L.ByunS.FarmerT. W.HutchinsB. C. (in press). Relationship of school context to rural youth’s educational achievement and aspirations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence.
32.
IsraelG. D.BeaulieuL. J. (2004). Investing in communities: Social capital’s role in keeping youth in school. Journal of the Community Development Society, 34(2), 35–57. doi:10.1080/1557533040949011110.1080/15575330409490111
33.
IsraelG. D.BeaulieuL. J.HartlessG. (2001). The influence of family and community social capital on educational achievement. Rural Sociology, 66(1), 43–68. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2001.tb00054.x10.1111/j.1549-0831.2001.tb00054.x
34.
JohnsonJ.StrangeM. (2009). Why rural matters 2009: The realities of rural education growth. Arlington, VA: The Rural School and Community Trust.
35.
LapanR. T.TuckerB.KimS.KosciulekJ. F. (2003). Preparing rural adolescents for post-high school transitions. Journal of Counseling & Development, 81, 329–342.
LeeJ.McIntireW. G. (2000). Interstate variation in the mathematics achievement of rural and nonrural students. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 16, 168–181.
38.
LichterD. T.JohnsonK. M. (2007). The changing spatial concentration of America’s rural poor population. Rural Sociology, 72, 331–358. doi:10.1526/003601107781799290
39.
LippmanL.BurnsS.McArthurE. (1996). Urban schools: The challenge of location and poverty. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
40.
LongJ. S.FreeseJ. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
41.
MonkD. H. (2007). Recruiting and retaining high-quality teachers in rural areas. The Future of Children, 17(1), 155–174. doi:10.1353/foc.2007.000910.1353/foc.2007.0009
ProvasnikS.KewalRamaniA.ColemanM. M.GilbertsonL.HerringW.XieQ. (2007). Status of education in rural America (NCES 2007-040). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
44.
RogersW. H. (1993). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 13, 19–23.
45.
RoscignoV. J.CrowleyM. L. (2001). Rurality, institutional disadvantage, and achievement/attainment. Rural Sociology, 66, 268–293. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2001.tb00067.x10.1111/j.1549-0831.2001.tb00067.x
46.
RoscignoJ. V.Tomaskovic-DeveyD.CrowleyL. M. (2006). Education and the inequalities of place. Social Forces, 84, 2121–2145.
47.
RoystonP. (2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal, 4, 227–241.
48.
Rural Policy Research Institute. (2006). Defining rural: Definitions of rural areas in the U.S. Columbia, MO: Author.
49.
SmithM. H.BeaulieuL. J.SeraphineA. (1995). Social capital, place of residence, and college attendance. Rural Sociology, 60, 363–380. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1995.tb00578.x10.1111/j.1549-0831.1995.tb00578.x
50.
SnyderT. D.DillowS. A. (2010). Digest of education statistics 2009 (NCES 2010-013). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
51.
StrongD. A.Del GrossP.BurwickA.JethwaniV.PonzaM. (Eds.). (2005). Rural research needs and data for selected human services. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
52.
SunY. (1999). The contextual effects of community social capital on academic performance. Social Science Research, 28, 403–426. doi:10.1006/ssre.1999.066110.1006/ssre.1999.0661
53.
SunY.HobbsD.ElderE.SunD. (1997). The effects of residence location on parental involvement with the school—A contrast between non-metropolitan rural and other communities. Southern Rural Sociology, 13, 41–64.
TruscottD. M.TruscottS. D. (2005). Differing circumstances, shared challenges: Finding common ground between urban and rural schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 123–130.
56.
TurleyR. N. L. (2009). College proximity: Mapping access to opportunity. Sociology of Education, 82, 126–146. doi:10.1177/00380407090820020210.1177/003804070908200202
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
