Age patterns of secondary certification and college entry differ in complex and surprising ways for traditional graduates and GED recipients. Although GED recipients are less likely to enter college in their late teens, they catch up to traditional graduates in their 20s. Results show that adjusting for differences in the age trajectories of school continuation accounts for a substantial portion of the differences observed between the two groups. Important differences remain, however, in the type of college attended and the likelihood of college entry before age 21. Nonetheless, more GED recipients enroll in college than previous studies have suggested, and this interest in college identifies a useful place for policy to intervene to encourage school continuation for this group.
AllisonP. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
AstoneN. M.UpchurchD. M. (1994). Forming a family, leaving school early, and earning a GED: A racial and cohort comparison. Journal of Marriage and Family, 56(3), 759–771.
3.
BinstockR.ShanasE. (Eds.). (1976). The handbook of aging and the social sciences. New York, NY: D. Van Nostrand Company.
4.
BoeselD.AlsalamN.SmithT. M. (1998). Educational and labor market outcomes of GED certification. Washington, DC: National Library of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
5.
BowlesS.GintisH. (2000). Does school raise earnings by making people smarter? In ArrowK.BowlesS.DurlaufS. (Eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 118–136). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BozickR.DeLucaS. (2005). Better late than never? Delayed enrollment in the high school to college transition. Social Forces, 84(1), 531–554.
7.
CameronS. V.HeckmanJ. J. (1993). The nonequivalence of high school equivalents. Journal of Labor Economics, 11, 1–47.
8.
CaoJ.StromsdorferE. W.WeeksG. (1996). The human capital effect of general education development certificates on low income women. The Journal of Human Resources, 31, 206–228.
9.
CaseA.FertigA.PaxsonC. (2005). The lasting impact of childhood health and circumstance. Journal of Health Economics, 24(2), 365–389.
10.
ElderG. H.Jr. (1975). Age differentiation and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 165–190.
11.
ElmanC.O’RandA. M. (2004). The race is to the swift: Socioeconomic origins, adult education, and wage attainment. American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 123–160.
12.
ElmanC.O’RandA. M. (2007). The effects of social origins, life events, and institutional sorting on adults’ school transitions. Social Science Research, 36, 1276–1299.
13.
FriedlanderD.MartinsonK. (1996). Effects of mandatory basic education for adult AFDC recipients. Educational Evaluations and Policy Analysis, 18, 327–337.
14.
HeckmanJ. J.HsseJ.RubinsteinY. (2000). The GED is a “mixed signal”: The effect of cognitive and non-cognitive skills on human capital and labor market outcomes. Paper presented at the AEA meetings, Boston.
15.
HeckmanJ. J.RubinsteinY. (2001). The importance of non-cognitive skills: Lessons from the GED testing program. The American Economic Review, 91, 154–149.
16.
HoganD. (1978). The variable order of events in the life course. American Sociological Review, 43, 573–586.
17.
JacobsJ. A.KingR. B. (2002). Age and college completion: A life-history analysis of women aged 15-44. Sociology of Education, 75, 211–230.
18.
KaneT. J.RouseC. E. (1999). The community college: Training students at the margin between college and work. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13, 63–84.
19.
KempnerK.KinnickM. (1990). Catching the window of opportunity: Being on time for higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 61, 535–547.
20.
LeeJ. C.StaffJ. (2007). When work matters: The varying impact of work intensity on high school dropout. Sociology of Education, 80, 158–178.
21.
MariniM. M. (1984). The order of events in the transition to adulthood. Sociology of Education, 57, 63–84.
22.
McElroyS. W. (1996). Early childbearing, high school completion, and college enrollment: Evidence from 1980 high school sophomores. Economics of Education Review, 15(3), 303–324.
23.
MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B.BoudettK. P. (1997). Does a GED lead to more training, post-secondary education, and military service for school dropouts?Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 51, 100–116.
24.
MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B.TylerJ. H. (2000). Who benefits from obtaining a GED? Evidence from high school and beyond. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 23–37.
25.
PallasA. M. (1993). Schooling in the course of human lives: The social context of education and the transition to adulthood in industrial society. Review of Educational Research, 63, 409–447.
26.
RindfussR. R. (1991). The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28, 493–512.
27.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28.
SmithT. M. (2003). Who values the GED? An examination of the paradox underlying the demand for the general education development credential. Teachers College Record, 105, 375–415.
29.
TylerJ. H. (2003). Economic benefits of the GED: Lessons from recent research. Review of Educational Research, 73, 369–405.
30.
TylerJ. H.MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2000). Estimating the labor market signaling value of the GED. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 431–468.
U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Subsequent educational attainment of high school dropouts (NCES 98-085). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
33.
VermuntJ. K. (1997). Log-linear models for event histories. London: Sage.
34.
WarrenJ. R. (2002). Reconsidering the relationship between student employment and academic outcomes: A new theory and better data. Youth & Society, 33(3), 366–393.
35.
WilletJ. B.SingerJ. D. (1991). From whether to when: New methods for studying student dropout and teacher attrition. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 407–450.
36.
WinshipC.KorenmanS. (1997). Does staying in school make you smarter? The effect of education on IQ in The Bell Curve. In DevlinB.FienbergS. E.ResnickD. P.RoederK. (Eds.), Intelligence, genes, and success: Scientists respond to The Bell Curve (pp. 215–234). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
