This article explores the relationship between school contextual factors and teacher retention decisions in New York City. The methodological approach separates the effects of teacher characteristics from school characteristics by modeling the relationship between the assessments of school contextual factors by one set of teachers and the turnover decisions by other teachers in the same school. We find that teachers’ perceptions of the school administration has by far the greatest influence on teacher retention decisions. This effect of administration is consistent for first-year teachers and the full sample of teachers and is confirmed by a survey of teachers who have recently left teaching.
AllensworthE.PonisciakS.MazzeoC. (2009). The schools teachers leave: Teacher mobility in Chicago Public Schools. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research. Retrieved July 10, 2010, from http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/publications/CCSR_Teacher_Mobility.pdf
2.
Alliance for Excellent Education. (2008). What keeps good teachers in the classroom? Understanding and reducing teacher turnover. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
AndersonC. S. (1982). The search for school climate: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 368–420.
BobbittS. A.LeichM. C.WhitenerS. D.LynchH. F. (1994). Characteristics of stayers, movers, and leavers: Results from the Teacher Follow-Up Survey: 1991-92 (NCES No. 94-337). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
6.
BoeE. E.BobbittS. A.CookL. H.WhitenerS. D.WeberA. L. (1996). Predictors of retention, transfer, and attrition of special and general education teachers: Data from the 1989 Teacher Follow-Up Survey (NCES No. 96-12). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
7.
BoydD.GrossmanP.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1, 176–216.
8.
BoydD.GrossmanP.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (in press). Who leaves? Teacher attrition and student achievement. Economics of Education Review.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.RonfeldtM.WyckoffJ. (in press). The role of teacher quality in retention and hiring: Using applications-to-transfer to uncover preferences of teachers and schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.
11.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2005). Explaining the short careers of high-achieving teachers in schools with low-performing students. American Economic Review, 95, 166–171.
12.
BranchG. F.HanushekE. A.RivkinS. G. (2009, January). Principal turnover and effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Economics Association, San Francisco, CA.
13.
BuckleyJ.SchneiderM.ShangY. (2005). Fix it and they might stay: School facility quality and teacher retention in Washington, D.C. Teachers College Record, 107, 1107–1123.
14.
CarrollS. J.ReichardtR. E.GuarinoC. M.MejiaA. (2000). The distribution of teachers among California’s school districts and schools (No. MR-1298.0-JIF). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
15.
CohenJ.McCabeL.MichelliN. M.PickeralT. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111, 180–213.
16.
CorcoranT. B.WalkerL. J.WhiteJ. L. (1988). Working in urban schools. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
17.
Darling-HammondL. (2003). Keeping good teachers: Why it matters, what leaders can do. Educational Leadership, 86, 42–51.
18.
DeAngelisK. J.PresleyJ. B. (2007). Leaving schools or leaving the profession: Setting Illinois’ record straight on teacher attrition (IERC 2007-1). Edwardsville: Illinois Education Research Council.
19.
DePaulA. (1998). What to expect your first year of teaching. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
20.
DinkesR.KempJ.BaumK. (2009). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2009 (NCES No. 2010-012/NCJ No. 228478). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
21.
DuFourR.EakerR. (1998). Professional learning communities at work. Reston, VA: Association for Curriculum and Development.
22.
DukeD. L. (2002). Creating safe schools for all children. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
ElamS. M. (1989). The second Phi Delta Kappa poll of teachers’ attitudes toward public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 785–798.
24.
GlaserK. W. (2003). Four ways to sustain all teachers. In SchererM. (Ed.), Keeping good teachers (pp. 153–158). Alexandria, VA: Association for Curriculum and Development.
25.
GoldhaberD.GrossB.PlayerD. (2007). Are public schools really losing their “best”? Assessing the career transitions of teachers and their implication for the quality of the teacher workforce (Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, Working Paper No. 12). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
26.
GrissomJ. (in press). Can good principals keep teachers in disadvantaged schools? Linking principal effectiveness to teacher satisfaction and turnover in hard-to-staff environments. Teachers College Record.
27.
GuarinoC. M.SantibanezL.DaleyG. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 173–208.
28.
HabermanM.RickardsW. H. (1990). Urban teachers who quit: Why they leave and what they do. Urban Education, 25, 297–303.
29.
HallingerP. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 1–20.
30.
HallingerP.HeckR. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5–44.
31.
HanushekE.KainJ.O’BrienD.RivkinS. (2005). The market for teacher quality (Technical report). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
32.
HanushekE.KainJ.RivkinS. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 326–354.
33.
HarrisD. N.RutledgeS. A.IngleW. K.ThompsonC. C. (2010). Mix and match: What principals really look for when hiring teachers. Education Finance and Policy, 5, 228–246.
34.
HenkeR.ZahnL.CarrollC. (2001). Attrition of new teachers among recent college graduates: Comparing occupational stability among 1992–1993 college graduates who taught and those who worked in other occupations. Education Statistics Quarterly, 3(2), 69–76.
35.
HirschE.EmerickS. (with ChurchK.FullerE.). (2007). Teacher working conditions are student learning conditions: A report on the 2006 North Carolina teacher working conditions survey. Hillsborough, NC: Center for Teaching Quality. Retrieved July 10, 2010, from http://ncteachingconditions.org/sites/default/files/attachments/twcnc2006.pdf
36.
IngersollR. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499–534.
37.
JohnsonS. M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York, NY: Basic Books.
38.
JohnsonS. M. (2006). The workplace matters: Teacher quality, retention and effectiveness. Washington DC: National Education Association. Retrieved June 14, 2010, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED495822.pdf
JohnsonS. M.BirkelandS. E. (2003). Pursuing a “sense of success”: New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 581–617.
41.
KnappM. S.CoplandM. A.PleckiM. L.PortinB. S. (2006). Leading, learning, and leadership support. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
42.
LaddH. (2009). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of policy-relevant outcomes (National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research Working Paper No. 33). Washington, DC: CALDER.
43.
LeeV. E.BrykA. S.SmithJ. B. (1993). The organization of effective secondary schools. Review of Research in Education, 19, 171–267.
44.
LeithwoodK.Seashore LouisK.AndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. St. Paul, MN: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.
45.
LoebS.Darling-HammondL.LuczakJ. (2005). How teaching conditions predict teacher turnover in California schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(3), 44–70.
46.
LoebS.KalogridesK.HorngE. (in press). Principal preferences and the uneven distribution of principals across schools. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis.
47.
LuekensM. T.LyterD. M.FoxE. (2004). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the Teacher Follow-Up Survey, 2000–01. Educational Statistics Quarterly, 6(3), 40–46.
48.
LuekensM. T.LyterD. M.FoxE. E.ChandlerK. (2004). Teacher Attrition and Mobility: Results from the Teacher Follow-Up Survey, 2000–01 (NCES No. 2004-301). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
49.
MacDonaldD. (1999). Teacher attrition: A review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 839–848.
50.
MarvelJ.LyterD. M.PeltolaP.StrizekG. A.MortonB. A. (2006). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2004–05 Teacher Follow-Up Survey (NCES No. 2007-307). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
51.
MayerM. J.FurlongM. J. (2010). How safe are our schools?Educational Researcher, 39, 16–26.
PerieM.BakerD. P. (1997). Job satisfaction among America’s teachers: Effects of workplace conditions, background characteristics and teacher compensation (NCES No. 97-471). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research.
56.
ScafidiB.SjoquistD. L.StinebricknerT. R. (2005). Race, poverty, and teacher mobility (Research Paper Series No. 06-51). Atlanta: Georgia State University, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies.
57.
ShenJ. (1997). Teacher retention and attrition in public schools: Evidence from SASS91. Journal of Educational Research, 91(2), 81–88.
58.
Steuteville-BrodinskyM.BurbankM. R.HarrisonC. (1989). Selecting, recruiting and keeping excellent teachers. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
TyeB. B.O’BrienL. (2002). Why are experienced teachers leaving the profession?Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 24–32.
63.
WatersT.MarzanoR. J.McNultyB. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
64.
WeissE. M. (1999). Perceived workplace conditions and first-year teachers’ morale, career choice commitment, and planned retention: A secondary analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 861–879.
