Abstract
Field-independent and field-dependent students listened to a taped lecture under one of four study technique conditions: (a) no notes, (b) student’s notes, (c) outline framework plus student’s notes, and (d) complete outline plus student’s notes. After listening to the lecture, all students were permitted a 10-minute review period, which was followed by a 20-item multiple choice test. Analyses of test performance and notes taken yielded results consistent with field independence-dependence theory. In particular, analyses of the significant interaction of Cognitive Style × Study Technique revealed that field-independent students performed better than field-dependent students under the student’s notes condition. Also, field-dependent students performed significantly worse under the student‘s notes condition than did field-dependent students under the complete outline condition. Notes of field-independent students were more efficient and tended to be in an outline format more often than notes of field-dependent students. The results are discussed in terms of explanations of performance differences, relevance for future notetaking research, and implications for educational practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
