Abstract
This study examined student ability and student behaviors during small-group interaction as hypothesized mediators of the effectiveness of small-group learning. Fifth-grade students (N = 43) completed ability and attitude pretests. Students were stratified on ability and randomly assigned to small groups within class. The small groups were assigned randomly to either a treatment or control condition. The treatment group was trained in small-group interaction. Students received regular classroom instruction in mathematics for 4 weeks. Each day after the teacher presented new material using direct instruction, students worked on assignments in mixed ability groups of four students. Achievement, retention, and attitude toward mathematics were assessed. A Mann-Whitney comparison showed that trained students participated in more task-related interaction than did control students. Results suggested that task-related interaction in the small group enhanced the achievement and retention of high and low ability students but did not facilitate the achievement of medium ability students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
