Abstract
Marascuilo and Levin’s use of the term “nesting” in previously published articles is idiosyncratic and contrary to well-established usage. Proper usage is described and illustrated. Their insistence on the usage of Scheffé tests on restricted sets of contrasts is opposed. Changing the model during the course of an analysis of a complex set of data often is both necessary and desirable. The flexibility desired in a good scientist is equally desirable in a good data analyst.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.