Quantitative analyses of maize cupule measurements from the Malpaso Valley, Zacatecas, Mexico, suggest that high-status households had preferred access to distinct maize varieties or maize with morphological traits that might be interpreted as high quality. Through a combination of cluster analysis, Principal Components Analysis, and chi-square tests, this study demonstrates the utility of examining the differential distribution of morphological traits, even when the remains occur primarily in the form of detached cupules. This study does not address the role of genetics and environment in the morphological variation of maize cobs, but it does show that an analysis of morphological variability in maize cobs can contribute to our understanding of social or economic differences both within and among archaeological settlements.
AdamsK. R., MuenchrathD. A., and SchwindtD. M.. 1999. Moisture effects on the morphology of ears, cobs, and kernels of a south-western U.S. maize (Zea mays L.) cultivar, and implications for the interpretation of archaeological maize. Journal of Archaeological Science26:483–496.
2.
AldenderferM. S.1982. Methods of cluster validation for archaeology. World Archaeology14:61–72.
3.
BeadleG. W.1980. The ancestry of corn. Scientific American242:1112–119.
4.
BenzB.1994. Can prehistoric racial diversification be deciphered from burned corn cobs?InCorn and culture in the prehistoric New World. edsJohannessenS. and HastorfC. A., editors. 23–34.Westview Press. Boulder.
5.
BerneyC.2002. Trade on the Mesoamerican frontier: Evaluating the significance of blue-green stones at La Quemada, Zacatecas, Mexico. M.A. Thesis (Anthropology),. University of British Columbia. Vancouver.
6.
BirdR. McK.1994. Manual for the measurement of maize cobs. InCorn and culture in the prehistoric New World. edsJohannessenS. and HastorfC. A., editors. 5–22.Westview Press. Boulder.
7.
BohrerV. L.1994. Maize in Middle American and Southwestern United States agricultural traditions. InCorn and culture in the prehistoric New World. edsJohannessenS. and HastorfC. A., editors. 469–512.Westview Press. Boulder.
8.
BrooksR. H., KaplanL., CutlerH. C., and WhitakerT. W.. 1962. Plant materials from a cave on the Rio Zape, Durango, Mexico. American Antiquity27:356–369.
9.
ClarkJ. E. and BlakeM.. 1994. The power of prestige: Competitive generosity and the emergence of rank societies in lowland Mesoamerica. InFactional competition and political development in the New World. edsBrumfielE. M. and FoxJ. W., editors. 17–32.Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
10.
Comisión Nacional de Agua n.d. Rainfall records from Comisión Nacional de Agua office in Guadalupe, Zacatecas, México.
11.
CordellL., DurandS. R., AntweilerR. C., and TaylorH. E.. 2001. Toward linking maize chemistry to archaeological agricultural sites in the North American Southwest. Journal of Archaeological Science28:501–513.
12.
CostinC. L. and EarleT.. 1989. Status distinction and legitimization of power as reflected in changing consumption in late prehispanic Peru. American Antiquity54:691–714.
13.
DarlingJ. A.1998. Obsidian distribution and exchange in the North-Central frontier of Mesoamerica. Ph.D. Dissertation (Anthropology),. University of Michigan. Ann Arbor.
14.
DoebleyJ. and BohrerV. L.. 1983. Maize variability and cultural selection at Salmon Ruin, New Mexico. The Kiva49:1–219–37.
15.
DoebleyJ. F., GoodmanM. M., and StuberC. W.. 1983. Isozyme variation in maize from the southwestern United States: Taxonomic and anthropological implications. Maydica28:97–120.
16.
DunavanS. L.1990. Analysis of a midden sample from the LR maguey fiber processing workshop. InMaguey utilization in Highland Central Mexico: An archaeological ethnography. edsParsonsJ. R. and ParsonsM. H., editors. Museum of Anthropology. Ann Arbor.
17.
ElliottM.2001. “Wet and low” or “high and dry”?: Modeling agricultural productivity in the North-Central Frontier of Mesoamerica. Manuscript on file at Arizona State University, Tempe.
18.
FalhauberJ.1960. Breve análisis osteológico de los restos humanos de “La Quemada,” Zacatecas. Anales de Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia12:131–149.
19.
FritzG. J.1994. The value of archaeological plant remains for paleodietary reconstruction. InPaleonutrition: The diet and health of prehistoric Americans. edSobolikK., editor. 21–33.Southern Illinois University, Center for Archaeological Investigations. Carbondale.
20.
GalinatW. C.1983. The origin of maize as shown by key morphological traits of its ancestor, teosinte. Maydica28:121–138.
21.
GoetteS., WilliamsM., JohannessenS., and HastorfC. A.. 1994. Toward reconstructing ancient maize: Experiments in processing and charring. Journal of Ethnobiology14:1–21.
22.
GoodmanM. M. and PaternianiE.. 1969. Races of maize: III. Choices of appropriate characters for racial classification. Economic Botany23:265–273.
23.
GumermanG. I. V.1994. Corn for the dead: The significance of Zea mays in Moche burial offerings. InCorn and culture in the prehistoric New World. edsJohannessenS. and HastorfC. A., editors. 399–410.Westview Press. Boulder.
24.
HastorfC. A. and JohannessenS.. 1993. Pre-hispanic political change and the role of maize in the central Andes of Peru. American Anthropologist95:115–138.
25.
HastorfC. A. and JohannessenS.. 1994. Becoming corn-eaters in prehistoric America. InCorn and culture in the Prehistoric New World. edsJohannessenS. and HastorfC. A., editors. 427–443.Westview Press. Boulder.
26.
JohannessenS., GoetteS., and HastorfC. A.. 1990. Modern and ancient maize fragments: An experiment in variability. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology2:179–200.
27.
KantorL.1995. Lithic specialization and exchange at La Quemada, Zacatecas, Mexico. M.A. Thesis (Anthropology),. State University of New York at Buffalo. Buffalo.
28.
KingF. B.1994. Variability in cob and kernel characteristics of North American maize cultivars. InCorn and culture in the prehistoric New World. edsJohannessenS. and HastorfC. A., editors. 35–54.Westview Press. Boulder.
29.
KintighK. W.1990. Intrasite spatial analysis: A commentary on major methods. InMathematics and information science in archaeology: A flexible framework. edVooriesA., editor. 165–200.HOLOS-Verlag. Bonn.
30.
KintighK. W.1994. Tools for quantitative archaeology: Programs for quantitative analysis in archaeology. Manuscript on file at Arizona State University, Tempe.
31.
MackeyJ. C.1983. The documentation of environmental control of morphological variability in archaeological maize: A paleoenvironmental reconstruction technique. Plains Archaeologist28:208–217.
32.
MackeyJ. C.1985. A thirteenth century A.D. example of the successful use of archaeological corn collections for paleoenvironmental reconstruction: A reply to Benz. Plains Archaeologist30:150–160.
33.
MangelsdorfP. C.1986. The origin of corn. Scientific American254:280–86.
34.
Medina GonzálezJ. H.2000. El pasaje ritual de Valle de Malpaso. Licenciatura en Arqueología. Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia. México.
35.
NelsonB. A.1995. Complexity, hierarchy, and scale: A controlled comparison between Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, and La Quemada, Zacatecas. American Antiquity60:597–619.
36.
NelsonB. A.1997. Chronology and stratigraphy at La Quemada, Zacatecas, Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology24:85–109.
37.
NelsonB. A., DarlingJ. A., and KiceD. A.. 1992. Mortuary practices and the social order at La Quemada, Zacatecas, Mexico. Latin American Antiquity3:298–315.
38.
NelsonB. A., KantorL., RobertsonI., SchiavittiV., StrazicichN., and TurkonP.. 1995. Informe parcial del Proyecto Valle de Malpaso—La Quemada Temporada 1993. Instituto Nacional de Antropología, Mexico City and Department of Anthropology. SUNY Buffalo.
39.
NelsonB. A., MillhauserJ., and ToD.. 1997. Burial excavations in plaza 1 of Los Pilarillos, Zacatecas, Mexico, 1997 Season. Instituto Nacional de Antropología, Mexico City and Arizona State University. Tempe.
40.
NelsonB. A. and SchiavittiV. W.. 1992. Trabajos Conducidos por la State University of New York at Buffalo dentro del Proyecto La Quemada 1989–90. Instituto Nacional de Antropología, Mexico City and Department of Anthropology. SUNY Buffalo.
41.
NelsonB. A., WeintraubP. D., and SchiavittiV. W.. 1993. Informe parcial del Proyecto Valle de Malpaso-La Quemada Temporada 1992, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia and Department of Anthropology, SUNY Buffalo.
42.
NelsonB. A., TurkonP., and MillhauserJ.. 2002. Informe técnico parcial del Proyecto La Quemada-Valle de Malpaso, Temporada 1997–98. Instituto Nacional de Antropología, Mexico City and Arizona State University. Tempe.
43.
OrtizA.1969. The Tewa world: Space, time, being, and becoming in a Pueblo society. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
44.
PijoanC. M. and MansillaJ.. 1990. Evidencias rituales en restos humanos del norte de mesoamerica. InMesoamerica y Norte de México, Siglo IX–XII. edSodi MirandaF., editor. 467–478.Institutito Nacional de Antropología e Historia y el Museo Nacional de Antropología. México.
45.
SahagunB.1969. Historia general de las cosas de Nueva España. Editorial Porrua, S.A. Mexico City.
46.
SanchezJ. J., GoodmanM. M., and RawlingsJ. O.. 1993. Appropriate characteristics for racial classification of maize. Economic Botany47:44–59.
47.
SchoenwetterJ.1963. On the ecology of the Valley of La Quemada. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia. Mexico City.
48.
Secretaría de Programación y Presupuesto1981. Syntesis geografica de ZacatecasCoordinación General de los servicios Nacionales de Estadistica, Geografia e Informatica, Mexico, D.F.
49.
ShennanS.1997. Quantifying archaeology, 2nd ed. Academic Press. San Diego.
50.
SteinbergM. K.1999. Maize diversity and cultural change in a Maya agroecological landscape. Journal of Ethnobiology19:127–139.
51.
StrazicichN.1995. Prehispanic pottery production in the Chalchihuites and La Quemada region of Zacatecas, Mexico. PhD. Dissertation (Anthropology),. State University of New York at Buffalo. Buffalo.
52.
StrossB.1994. Maize and fish: The iconography of power in late formative Mesoamerica. Res Anthropology and Aesthetics25:10–35.
53.
ToD.1999. Bioarchaeology of a disarticulated multiple burial, Los Pilarillos, Zacatecas, Mexico. M.A. Thesis (Anthropology),. Arizona State University. Tempe.
54.
TollH. W.1991. Material distributions and exchange in the Chaco system. InChaco and Hohokam: Prehistoric regional systems in the American Southwest. edsCrownP. L. and JudgeW. J., editors. 77–108.School of American Research Press. Santa Fe.
55.
TollM. S.1990. Flotation from site MV-138-86, La Quemada Region, Zacatecas, Mexico. Manuscript on file at Castetter Laboratory for Ethnobotanical Studies.
56.
TollM. S. and HuckellL.. 1996. Guidelines for the standardizing collection of Zea mays morphometric data. Paper presented at the 4th Southwest Paleoethnobotany Workshop, Santa Fe.
57.
TromboldC. D.1977. The role of locational analysis in the development of archaeological research strategy. Ph.D. Dissertation (Anthropology),. Southern Illinois University. Carbondale.
58.
TromboldC. D.1985. A summary of the archaeology of the La Quemada region. InThe archaeology of West and Northwest Mexico. edsFosterM. S. and WeigandP. C., editors. 327–352.Westview Press. Boulder.
59.
TromboldC. D.1991. Causeways in the contexts of strategic planning in the La Quemada region, Zacatecas, Mexico. InAncient road networks and settlement hierarchies in the New World. edTromboldC. D., editor. 145–168.Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
60.
TromboldC. D.2000. Informe técnico preliminar al Consejo de Arqueología (INAH) Sitio MV-206, Villanueva, México, Primero Temporada 27 Enero 1999–11 Noviembre 1999. Manuscript on file at Washington University, St. Louis.
61.
TurkonP.2002. Social identity and food in the prehispanic Malpaso Valley, Zacatecas, Mexico. PhD. Dissertation (Anthropology),. Arizona State University. Tempe.
62.
TurkonP.2004. Food and status in the prehispanic Malpaso Valley, Zacatecas, Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology23:225–251.
63.
WatsonP. J.1976. In pursuit of prehistoric subsistence: A comparative account of some contemporary flotation techniques. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology1:77–100.
64.
WeintraubP.1992. The use of wild and cultivated plant foods at the site of La Quemada, Zacatecas. M.A. project. (Anthropology),. State University of New York at Buffalo. Buffalo.
65.
WellhausenE. J., RobertsL. M., and HernándezE.. 1952. Races of maize in Mexico. Basey Institute of Harvard University. Cambridge.
66.
WellsE. C.2000. Pottery production and microcosmic organization: The residential structure of La Quemada, Zacatecas. Latin American Antiquity11:21–42.
67.
WhitingA. F.1966. Ethnobotany of the Hopi. Museum of Northern Arizona. Flagstaff.
68.
WymerD. A.1994. The social context of early maize in the mid-Ohio Valley. InCorn and culture in the prehistoric New World. edsJohannessenS. and HastorfC. A., editors. 411–426.Westview Press. Boulder.
