Incorporating general education peers into social skills instructional programs has been effective at increasing social interaction of high school students with intellectual disabilities and autism with their classmates. In this study, communication book use (Hughes et al., 2000), combined with providing the opportunity to interact, was associated with increases in conversational initiations and responses of five high school students identified with intellectual disabilities and autism and their general education peers. We also addressed a limitation of Hughes et al. (2000) by expanding the role of peers during generalization to (a) engage in conversational interactions that were more reciprocal and typical of high school student dyads and (b) provide support to participants while interacting. This study adds to the few published social skills interventions involving high school students with intellectual disabilities and autism in inclusive settings and extends findings to a population of students with more varied communication characteristics.
AlwellM.CobbB. (2009). Social and communicative interventions and transition outcomes for youth with disabilities: A systematic review. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 94–107. doi:10.1177/0885728809336657.
2.
CarterE. W.HughesC. (2005). Increasing social interaction among adolescents with intellectual disabilities and their general education peers: Effective interventions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 179–193.
3.
CarterE. W.HughesC. (2006). Including high school students with severe disabilities in general education classes: Perspectives of general and special educators, paraprofessionals, and administrators. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 174–185.
4.
CarterE. W.HughesC.GuthC. B.CopelandS. R. (2005). Factors influencing social interaction among high school students with intellectual disabilities and their general education peers. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110, 366–377.
5.
CarterE. W.KennedyC. H. (2006). Promoting access to the general curriculum using peer support strategies. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 284–292.
6.
CarterE. W.PeskoM. J. (2008). Social validity of peer interaction intervention strategies in high school classrooms: Effectiveness, feasibility, and actual use. Exceptionality, 16, 156–173. doi:10.1080/09362830802198427.
7.
CarterE. W.SiscoL. G.BrownL.BrickhamD.Al-KhabbazZ. A. (2008). Peer interactions and academic engagement of youth with developmental disabilities in inclusive middle and high school classrooms. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113, 479–494. doi:10.1352/2008.113:479-494.
8.
CarterE. W.SiscoL. G.ChungY.Stanton-ChapmanT. L. (2010). Peer interactions of students with intellectual disabilities and/or autism: A map of the intervention literature. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 35, 63–79.
9.
DavisK. M.BoonR. T.CihakD. F.ForeC.III (2010). Power cards to improve conversational skills in adolescents with Asperger syndrome. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25, 12–22. doi:10.1177/1088357609354299.
10.
FeyM. E. (1986). Language intervention with young children. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
11.
Gaylord-RossR. J.HaringT. G.BreenC.Pitts-ConwayV. (1984). The training and generalization of social interaction skills with autistic youth. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 229–247. doi:10.1901/jaba.1984.17-229.
12.
GreshamF. M.SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2001). Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67, 331–344.
13.
HaringT. G.BreenC. G. (1992). A peer-mediated social network intervention to enhance the social integration of persons with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 319–333. doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-319.
14.
HendricksD. R.WehmanP. (2009). Transition from school to adulthood for youth with autism spectrum disorder: Review and recommendations. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 77–88. doi:10.1177/1088357608329827.
15.
HornerR. D.BaerD. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196. doi:10.1901/jaba.1978.11-189.
16.
HughesC.HarmerM. L.KillianD. J.NiarhosF. (1995). The effects of multiple exemplar self-instructional training on high school students' generalized conversation interactions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 201–218. doi:10.1901/jaba.1995.28-201.
17.
HughesC.RodiM. S.LordenS. W.PitkinS. E.DererK. R.HwangB. (1999). Social interactions of high school students with mental retardation and their general education peers. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 104, 533–544.
18.
HughesC.RungL. L.WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.CopelandS. R.HwangB. (2000). Self-prompted communication book use to increase social interaction among high school students. The Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 25, 153–166.
19.
HuntP.AlwellM.GoetzL.SailorW. (1990). Generalized effects of conversational skill training. The Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 15, 250–260.
20.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, PL 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.
21.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single case research design: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
KoegelR. L.KoegelL. K. (2006). Pivotal response treatments for autism: Communication, social, and academic development. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
23.
Mayer-Johnson (2008). Boardmaker® with speaking dynamically Pro® [computer software]. Solana beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.
24.
MuK.SiegelE.AllinderR. (2000). Peer interactions and sociometric status of high school students with moderate or severe disabilities in general education classrooms. The Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 25, 142–152.
25.
NaraianS. (2010). “Why not have fun?”: Peers make sense of an inclusive high school program. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 14–30. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-48.1.14.
26.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, PL 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425, 20 U.S.C. §§ 6301 et seq.
27.
PlienisA. J.HansenD. J.FordF.SmithS.StarkL. J.Jr.KellyJ. A. (1987). Behavioral small group training to improve the social skills of emotionally-disordered adolescents. Behavior Therapy, 18, 17–32. doi:0005-7894/87/0017-0032.
28.
ReichowB.VolkmarF. R. (2010). Social skills interventions for individuals with autism: Evaluation for evidence-based practices within a best evidence synthesis framework. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 149–166. doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0842-0.
29.
ScattoneD.TingstromD. H.WilczynskiS. M. (2006). Increasing appropriate social interactions of children with autism spectrum disorders using Social Stories™. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 211–220. doi:10.1177/10883576060210040201.
30.
SchnorrR. F. (1990). “Peter? He comes and goes…”: First-graders' perspectives on a part-time mainstream student. The Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 15, 231–240.
31.
ShuklaS.KennedyC. H.CushingL. S. (1999). Intermediate school students with severe disabilities: Supporting their social participation in general education classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 130–140. doi:10.1177/109830079900100301.
32.
StaubD.HuntP. (1993). The effects of social interaction training on high school peer tutors of schoolmates with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 60, 41–57.
33.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181. doi:10.1177/0885728809346960.
34.
U.S. Department of Education. (2009). 28th Annual report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 2006. Washington, DC: Author.
35.
WallaceT.AndersonA. R.BartholomayT.HuppS. (2002). An ecobehavioral examination of high school classrooms that include students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68, 345–359.
36.
WangP.SpillaneA. (2009). Evidence-based social skills interventions for children with autism: A meta-analysis. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 318–342.
37.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
