Although paraprofessionals play a prominent role in the education of students with severe disabilities, little is known about the roles these school staff play in fostering self-determination. In this descriptive study, researchers examined the extent to which 347 paraprofessionals employed at 135 randomly selected schools (a) considered each of seven self-determination skills to be important instructional areas for the students with whom they work and (b) reported providing instruction to students in each of these skill areas. Although paraprofessionals generally attached high importance to these elements of self-determination, the extent to which they provided instruction was somewhat variable. Moreover, ratings of some self-determination elements differed based on the school level (i.e., elementary vs. secondary school) and educational setting (e.g., special vs. general education classroom) in which paraprofessionals provided support. Although paraprofessionals reported some familiarity with the overarching construct of self-determination, they infrequently received training on this domain. Recommendations for research and practice aimed at equipping paraprofessionals to support self-determination are provided.
AgranM.HughesC. (2005). Introduction to the special issue on self-determination: How far have we come?Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 105–107.
2.
AlgozzineB.BrowderD.KarvonenM.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 219–277. doi: 10.3102/00346543071002219.
3.
BrownL.FarringtonK.KnightT.RossC.ZieglerM. (1999). Fewer paraprofessionals and more teachers and therapists in educational programs for students with significant disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 24, 250–253.
4.
CarterE. W.LaneK. L.PiersonM. R.StangK. K. (2008). Promoting self-determination for transition-age youth: Views of high school general and special educators. Exceptional Children, 75, 55–70.
5.
CarterE. W.O'RourkeL.SiscoL. G.PelsueD. (2009). Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 344–359. doi: 10.1177/0741932508324399.
6.
CarterE. W.OwensL.TrainorA. A.SunY.SwedeenB. (2009). Self-determination skills and opportunities of adolescents with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 114, 179–192. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-114.3.179.
7.
ChoH.WehmeyerM.KingstonN. (in press). Elementary teachers' knowledge and use of interventions and barriers to promoting self-determination. The Journal of Special Education. doi: 10.1177/0022466910362588.
8.
CobbB.LehmannJ.Newman-GoncharR.AlwellM. (2009). Self-determination for students with disabilities: A narrative metasynthesis. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 108–114. doi: 10.1177/0885728809336654.
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
DannekerJ. E.BottgeB. A. (2009). Benefits and barriers to elementary student-led individualized education programs. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 225–233. doi: 10.1177/0741932508315650.
11.
FrenchN. K. (2003). Paraeducators in special education programs. Focus on Exceptional Children, 36, 1–16.
12.
GhereG.York-BarrJ. (2007). Paraprofessional turnover and retention in inclusive programs: Hidden costs and promising practices. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 21–32. doi: 10.1177/0741932508324399.
13.
GiangrecoM. F. (2009). Critical issues brief: Concerns about the proliferation of one-to-one paraprofessionals. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children, Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities.
14.
GiangrecoM. F. (2010). One-to-one paraprofessionals for students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms: Is conventional wisdom wrong?Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 48, 1–13. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-48.1.1.
15.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M. (2005). Questionable utilization of paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: Are we addressing symptoms or causes?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 10–26. doi: 10.1177/10883576050200010201.
16.
GiangrecoM. F.HurleyS. M.SuterJ. C. (2009). Special education personnel utilization and general class placement of students with disabilities: Ranges and ratios. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 53–56. doi: 10.1352/2009.47:53–56.
17.
GiangrecoM. F.SuterJ. C.DoyleM. B. (2010). Paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: A review of recent research. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20, 41–57. doi: 10.1080/10474410903535356.
18.
KohlerP. D.FieldS. (2003). Transition-focused education: Foundation for the future. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 174–183. doi: 10.1177/00224669030370030701.
19.
LuskS. L.CookD. (2009). Enhancing career exploration, decision making, and problem solving of adolescent girls with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 31, 145–153. doi: 10.3233/JVR-2009-0484.
20.
MasonC.FieldS.SawiloskyS. (2004). Implementation of self-determination activities and student participation in IEPs. Exceptional Children, 70, 441–451.
21.
National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. (2005). The self-determination of youth with disabilities. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved on December 2, 2009, from http://www.nlts2.org/fact_sheets/2005_06-2.html.
22.
PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L. (2003). Promoting self-determination in early elementary school: Teaching self-regulated problem solving and goal-setting skills. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 115–126. doi: 10.1177/07419325030240020601.
23.
RyndakD. L.MooreM. A.OrlandoA.DelanoM. (2008/2009). Access to the general curriculum: The mandate and role of context in research-based practice for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33–34, 199–213.
24.
StangK. K.CarterE. W.LaneK. L.PiersonM. R. (2009). Perspectives of general and special educators on fostering self-determination in elementary and middle schools. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 94–106. doi: 10.1177/0022466907313452.
25.
TestD. W.MasonC.HughesC.KonradM.NealeM.WoodW. M. (2004). Student involvement in individualized education program meetings. Exceptional Children, 70, 391–412.
26.
ThomaC. A.NathansonR.BakerS. R.TamuraR. (2002). Self-determination: What do special educators know and where do they learn it?Remedial and Special Education, 23, 242–247. doi: 10.1177/07419325020230040701.
27.
ThomaC. A.PannozzoG. M.FrittonS. C.BartholomewC. C. (2008). A qualitative study of preservice teachers' understanding of self-determination for students with significant disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 94–105. doi: 10.1177/0885728808317444.
28.
TurnbullH. R.TurnbullA. P.WehmeyerM. L.ParkJ. (2003). A quality of life framework for special education outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 67–74. doi: 10.1177/07419325030240020201.
29.
WehmeyerM. L. (2000). The Arc's Self-Determination Scale. Silver Springs, MD: The Arc of the United States.
30.
WehmeyerM. L. (2005). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Re-examining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 113–120.
31.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.HughesC. (2000). A national survey of teachers' promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 58–68. doi: 10.1177/002246690003400201.
32.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.HughesC.MartinJ.MithaugD. E.PalmerS. (2007). Promoting self-determination in students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.
33.
WoodW. M.FowlerC. H.UpholdN.TestD. W. (2005). A review of self-determination interventions with individuals with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 121–146.
34.
ZhangD.WehmeyerM. L.ChenL. (2005). Parent and teacher engagement in fostering the self-determination of students with disabilities: A comparison between the United States and the Republic of China. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 55–64. doi: 10.1177/07419325050260010701.
