All teacher preparation programs face serious challenges; however, programs that prepare teachers to work with students with extensive support needs face additional, unique challenges in preparing professionals to facilitate their students' development of functional skills and to ensure their access to the general education curriculum. The purpose of this article is to examine current issues in preparing teachers to work with students with extensive support needs. An examination of how philosophy, law, research, and certification requirements impact the content and structure of teacher preparation programs is provided. Suggestions for teacher educators are included.
AgranM.CavinM.WehmeyerM.PalmerS. (2006). Participation of students with moderate to severe disabilities in the general curriculum: The effects of the self-determined learning model of instruction. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 230–241.
2.
BerlinerD. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31, 18–20.
3.
BrownL.NietupskiJ.Hamre-NietupskiS. (1976). The criterion of ultimate functioning and public school services for severely handicapped students. In ThomasM. A. (Ed.), Hey, don't forget about me: Education's investment in the severely, profoundly and multiply handicapped (pp. 2–15). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
4.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982. Assented to March 29, 1982.
5.
ConstantineJ.PlayerD.SilvaT.HallgrenK.GriderM.DekeJ. (2009). An evaluation of teachers trained through different routes to certification: Final report (NCEE 2009-4043). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
6.
CopelandS.CosbeyJ. (2008/2009). Making progress in the general curriculum: Rethinking effective instructional practices. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33–34, 214–227.
7.
DowningJ. (2006). On peer support, universal design, and access to the core curriculum for students with severe disabilities: A personnel preparation perspective. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 327–330.
8.
DunnL. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 5–24.
9.
EichingerJ.DowningJ. (2000). Restructuring special education certification: What should be done?Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25, 109–112.
10.
FoxL.WilliamsD. G. (1992). Preparing teachers of students with severe disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 97–107.
11.
FriendM.BursuckW. D. (2009). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for classroom teachers (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
12.
GartnerA.LipskyD. K. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 367–385.
13.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. 1400, H. R. 1350.
14.
JacksonL.RyndakD. L.WehmeyerM. (2008/2009). The dynamic relationship between context, curriculum, and learning: A case for inclusive education as a research-based practice. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33–34, 175–195.
15.
KeefeE. B.RossiP. J.de ValenzuelaJ. S.HowarthS. (2000). Reconceptualizing teacher preparation for inclusive classrooms: A description of the dual license program at the University of New Mexico. Journal for the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 72–82.
16.
KozolJ. (1981). On being a teacher. New York: Bantam Books.
17.
LaneG. M.CanosaR. (1995). A mentoring program for beginning and veteran teachers of students with severe disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 18, 230–239.
18.
LazureD.RobertsC. A. (1970). One million children (The Celdic Report: Commission on Emotional and Learning Disorders in Children). Ottawa, ON: Document of the Canadian Government.
19.
LittleD. (1987, May). The rights of children. Paper presented at the meeting of the New Brunswick School Districts' (Anglophone) Directors and Supervisors of Special Education, Saint John, NB.
20.
LongT. J.BrownC.Nagy-RadoA. (2007). Preparing special educators to assume collaborative and consultative roles. Catholic Education, 10, 490–507.
21.
NirjeB. (1969). The normalization principle and its human management implications. In KugelR. B.WolfensbergerW. (Eds.), Changing patterns in residential services for the mentally retarded (pp. 179–195). Washington, DC: President's Committee on Mental Retardation.
22.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
23.
O'ReillyM.RenzagliaA. (1994). A systematic approach to curriculum selection and supervision strategies: A preservice practicum supervision model. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 170–180.
24.
PetersonJ. M.HittieM. M. (2003). Inclusive teaching: Creating effective schools for all learners. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
25.
Public Law 94-142. Education For All Handicapped Children Act. Congressional Record (1975, October 29). H.R. 7217.
26.
RainforthB. (2000). Preparing teachers to educate students with severe disabilities in inclusive settings despite contextual constraints. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25, 83–91.
27.
RosenbergM.SindelarP.HardmanM. (2004). Preparing highly qualified teachers for students with emotional or behavioral disorders: The impact of NCLB and IDEA. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 266–278.
28.
RyndakD. L.ClarkD.ConroyM.StuartC. H. (2001). Preparing teachers to meet the needs of students with severe disabilities: Program configuration and expertise. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 96–105.
29.
RyndakD. L.KennedyC. (2000). Meeting the needs of students with severe disabilities: Issues and practices in teacher education. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25, 69–71.
30.
RyndakD. L.MooreM. A.OrlandoA.-M.DelanoM. (2008/2009). Access to the general curriculum: The mandate and role of context in research-based practice for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33–34, 199–213.
31.
SpoonerF. (1996). Personnel preparation: Where we have been and where we may be going in severe disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 19, 213–215.
32.
SpoonerF.AgranM.SpoonerM.Kiefer-O'DonnellR. (2000). Preparing personnel with expertise in severe disabilities in the electronic age: Innovative programs and technologies. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25, 92–103.
33.
StainbackW.StainbackS. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102–111.
34.
StainbackS.StainbackW. (1990). Inclusive schooling. In StainbackW.StainbackS. (Eds.), Support networks for inclusive schooling (pp. 3–23). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
35.
ThompsonS.LazarusS.ClapperA. (2006). Adequate yearly progress of students with disabilities: Competencies for teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29, 137–147.
36.
TurnbullA.TurnbullR.WehmeyerM. (2010). Exceptional lives: Special education in today's schools (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
37.
TurnbullR.HuertaN.StoweM. (2006). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act as amended in 2004. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
38.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (1994). Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Paris: Author.
39.
VillaR. A.ThousandJ. S. (2005). The rationales for creating and maintaining inclusive schools. In VillaR. A.ThousandJ. S. (Eds.), Creating an inclusive school (2nd ed., pp. 41–56). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
40.
WestlingD. L.FoxL. (2009). Teaching students with severe disabilities (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
WillM. (1986). Educating students with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of Education.
42.
WolfensbergerW. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
43.
ZiontsP. (2005). Inclusion. In ZiontsP. (Ed.), Inclusion strategies for students with learning and behavior problems: Perspectives, experiences and best practices (2nd ed., pp. 3–27). Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.
