CarterE. W.SiscoL. G.MelekogluM. A.KurkowskiC. (2007). Peer supports as an alternative to individually assigned paraprofessionals in inclusive high school classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32, 213–227.
2.
ColeC. M.WaldronN.MajdM. (2004). Academic progress of students across inclusive and traditional settings. Mental Retardation, 42, 136–144.
3.
CollinsB. C.EvansA.Creech-GallowayC.KarlJ.MillerA. (2007). Comparison of the acquisition and maintenance of teaching functional and core content sight words in special and general education settings. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 220–233.
4.
DymondS. K.RenzagliaA.RosensteinA.ChunE. J.BanksR. A.NiswanderV. (2006). Using a participatory action research approach to create a universally designed inclusive high school science course: A case study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 293–308.
5.
FarlowL. J.SnellM. E. (2005). Making the most of student performance data. In WehmeyerM. L.AgranM. (Eds.), Mental retardation and intellectual disabilities: Teaching students using innovative and research-based practices (pp. 27–77). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
6.
FisherM.MeyerL. H. (2002). Development and social competence after two years for students enrolled in inclusive and self-contained educational programs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 27, 165–174.
7.
FryxellD.KennedyC. H. (1995). Placement along the continuum of services and its impact on students' social relationships. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 259–269.
8.
GilbertsG. H.AgranM.HughesC.WehmeyerM. (2001). The effects of peer delivered self-monitoring strategies on the participation of students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 25–36.
9.
HuntP.Farron-DavisF.BecksteadS.CurtisD.GoetzL. (1994). Evaluating the effects of placement of students with severe disabilities in regular education versus special classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 200–214.
10.
HuntP.SotoG.MaierJ.MulerE.GoetzL. (2002). Collaborative teaming to support students with augmentative and alternative communication needs in general education classrooms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 20–35.
11.
JanneyR. E.SnellM. E. (in press). Designing and implementing instruction for inclusive classes. In SnellM. E.BrownF. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
12.
JohnsonJ. W.McDonnellJ.HolzwarthW. N.HunterK. (2004). The efficacy of embedded instruction for students with developmental disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 214–227.
13.
JusticeL. M.SnellM. E. (2007). Illustration of a three-step process for identifying the level and quality of empirical support for manualized treatments. Evidence-based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, 37–47.
14.
KalamboukaA.FarrellP.DysonA.KaplanI. (2007). The impact of placing pupils with special education needs in mainstream schools on the achievement of their peers. Educational Research, 49, 365–382.
15.
LoganK. R.KeefeE. B. (1997). A comparison of instructional context, teacher behavior, and engaged behavior for students with severe disabilities in general education and self-contained elementary classrooms. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 16–27.
16.
McDonnellJ.Mathot-BucknerC.ThorsonN.FisterS. (2001). Supporting the inclusion of student with moderate and severe disabilities in junior high school general education classes: The effects of classwide peer tutoring, multi-element curriculum, and accommodations. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 141–160.
17.
McDonnellJ.ThorsonN.DisherS.Mathot-BucknerC.MendelJ.RayL. (2003). The achievement of students with developmental disabilities and their peers without disabilities in inclusive settings: An exploratory study. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 224–236.
18.
McDonnellJ.ThorsonN.McQuiveyC.Kiefer-O'DonnellR. (1997). The academic engaged time of students with low incidence disabilities in general education classes. Mental Retardation, 35, 18–26.
19.
PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L.GipsonK.AgranA. (2004). Promoting access to the general curriculum by teaching self-determination skills. Exceptional Children, 70, 427–439.
20.
RappW. H. (2005). Inquiry-based environments for the inclusion of students with exceptional learning needs. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 297–310.
21.
SnellM. E.ChenL. Y.HooverK. (2006). Teaching augmentative and alternative communication to students with severe disabilities: A review of intervention research 1997–2003. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 203–214.
22.
WehmeyerM. L.YeagerD.BoldingN.AgranM.HughesC. (2003). The effects of self-regulation strategies on goal attainment for students with developmental disabilities in general education classes. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 15, 79–91.