Nine children with complex communication needs and concurrent vision and hearing losses participated in an intervention program aimed at increasing intentional prelinguistic communication. The intervention constituted a pilot, descriptive study of an adapted version of prelinguistic milieu teaching, hence referred to as A-PMT. In A-PMT, natural gestures and vocalizations were targeted in child-focused, one-on-one activities conducted by a member of the project staff. Adaptations included using more physical prompts than in other forms of PMT and using means other than directed eye gaze to determine directionality of gestures. All nine participants increased their rates of initiated, intentional communication substantially during the course of intervention; in addition, each participant acquired new forms of natural gestures. Results were limited primarily to requests (as opposed to other communication functions). Discussion centers on how to promote more generalized communication developments in future implementations of the program.
BakemanR.AdamsonL. B. (1986). Infants' conventionalized acts: Gestures and words with mothers and peers. Infant Behavior & Development, 9, 215–230.
2.
BatesE.BenigniL.BrethertonI.CamaioniL.VolterraV. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.
3.
BradyN.McLeanJ.McLeanL.JohnstonS. (1995). Initiation and repair of intentional communication acts by adults with severe to profound cognitive disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1334–1348.
4.
BrunerJ. (1984). Interaction, communication, and self. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 23, 1–7.
5.
ButterworthG.GroverL. (1988). The origins of referential communication in human infancy. In WeiskrantzL. (Ed.), Thought without language (pp. 5–24). New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
CalculatorS. (2002). Use of enhanced natural gestures to foster interactions between children with Angelman syndrome and their parents. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 340–355.
7.
CarterM. (2003). Communicative spontaneity of children with high support needs who use augmentative and alternative communication systems II: Antecedents and effectiveness of communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 155–169.
8.
CarterM.IaconoT. (2002). Professional judgments of the intentionality of communicative acts. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 177–191.
9.
CraisE.Day-DouglasD.Cox-CampbellC. (2004). The intersection of the development of gestures and intentionality. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47, 678–694.
10.
FeyM.WarrenS.BradyN.FinestackL.Bredin-OjaS.FairchildM. (2006). Early effects of prelinguistic milieu teaching and responsivity education for children with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49, 526–547.
11.
HoughtonJ.BronickiG. J. B.GuessD. (1987). Opportunities to express preferences and make choices among students with severe disabilities in classroom settings. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 12, 18–27.
12.
KasariC.FreemanS.PaparellaT. (2006). Joint attention and symbolic play in young children with autism: A randomized controlled intervention study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 611–620.
13.
KilloranJ. (2007). The national deaf–blind child count: 1998–2005 in review. Paper presented at the State/Multi-State Deaf-Blind Project Directors' Meeting, Washington, DC.
14.
MarH. H.SallN. (1994). Programmatic approach to use of technology in communication instruction for children with dual sensory impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 138–150.
15.
McLeanJ.McLeanL.BradyN.EtterR. (1991). Communication profiles of two types of gesture using nonverbal persons with severe to profound mental retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 294–308.
16.
Noldus Information Technology. (2002). The Observer, version 4.1. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Noldus Information Technology.
17.
PinderG. L.OlswangL. (1995). Development of communicative intent in young children with cerebral palsy: A treatment efficacy study. Infant–Toddler Intervention, 5, 51–70.
18.
RollinsP. R.WambacqI.DowellD.MathewsL.ReeseP. B. (1998). An intervention technique for children with autistic spectrum disorder: Joint attentional routines. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 181–189.
19.
SaundersM.QuestadK.KedziorskiT.BoaseB.PattersonE.CullinanT. (2001). Unprompted mechanical switch use in individuals with severe multiple disabilities: An evaluation of the effects of body position. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 13, 27–39.
20.
SaundersM.SaundersR.MulugetaA.HenersonK.KedziorskiT.HekkerB. (2005). A novel method for testing learning and preferences in people with minimal motor movement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 255–266.
21.
SaundersM.TimlerG.CullinanT.PlilkeyS.QuestadK.SaundersR. (2003). Evidence of contingency awareness in people with profound multiple impairments: Response duration versus response rate indicators. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 231–245.
22.
SchweigertP.RowlandC. (1992). Early communication and microtechnology: Instructional sequence and case studies of children with severe multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 273–286.
23.
Siegel-CauseyE.GuessD. (1989). Enhancing nonsymbolic communication interactions among learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
SnellM. (2002). Using dynamic assessment with learners who communicate nonsymbolically. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 163–176.
25.
Snyder-McLeanL. K.SolomonsonB.McLeanJ.SackS. (1984). Structuring joint action routines: A strategy for facilitating communication and language development in the classroom. Seminars in Speech and Language, 5, 213–228.
26.
SongA.JonesS.LippertJ.MetzgenK.MillerJ.BorrecaC. (1980). Wisconsin Behavior Rating Scale. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for the Developmentally Disabled.
TellerD. (1989). Teller acuity cards and handbook. New York: Vistech Consultants.
29.
TomaselloM. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
TomaselloM.ToddJ. (1983). Joint attention and lexical acquisition style. First Language, 4, 197–211.
31.
WarrenS.Bredin-OjaS.Fairchild-EscalanteM.FinestackL.FeyM.BradyN. (2006). Responsivity education/prelinguistic milieu teaching. In McCauleyR.FeyM. (Eds.), Treatment of language disorders in children (pp. 47–77). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
32.
WarrenS. F.YoderP. J. (1998). Facilitating the transition from preintentional to intentional communication. In WetherbyA.WarrenS.ReichleJ. (Eds.), Transitions in prelinguistic communication (Vol. 7, pp. 365–385). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
33.
WetherbyA. M.AlexanderD. G.PrizantB. M. (1997). The ontogeny and role of repair strategies. In WetherbyA.WarrenS.ReichleJ. (Eds.), Transitions in prelinguistic communication (pp. 135–161). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
WoleryM.GastD. L. (1984). Effective and efficient procedures for the transfer of stimulus control. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4, 52–77.
36.
Woods-CripeJ.VennM. (1997). Family-guided routines for early intervention services. Young Exceptional Children, 18–26.
37.
YoderP.WarrenS. (1998). Maternal responsivity predicts the prelinguistic communication intervention that facilitates generalized intentional communication. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 41, 1207–1219.
