Documentation of positive outcomes for severely handicapped learners as a function of their educational programs is receiving increased attention as the major focus of program development, monitoring, and evaluation efforts. At the same time, those strategies that have been used predominantly to determine program effectiveness—particularly single-subject experimental designs and developmentally-based assessments—are being challenged as inadequate methods for accomplishing this task. This paper outlines existing concerns and argues for the general evaluative concept of educational validity. Suggestions are provided for measuring the three criteria that are essential components of educational validity. Also emphasized is the professional's obligation to advocate on behalf of program needs based upon knowledge and professional judgment.
ButlerJ. A.StenmarkS.P.L. 94–142: Can we evaluate outcomes?Washington, D.C.: Institute for Health Policy Studies, July 1981.
2.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education. Liaison bulletin: Recommendations to revise regulations for P.L. 94–142. Washington, D.C.: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, May 1981.
3.
BrownL.NisbetJ.FordA.SweetM.ShiragaB.LoomisR.The critical need for nonschool instruction in educational programs for severely handicapped students. Unpublished paper, University of Wisconsin and Madison Metropolitan School District, 1982.
4.
ClaybaughK.Effect of student preference on instructional time received in two severely multiply handicapped classrooms. Unpublished master's paper, University of Hawaii Department of Special Education, 1980.
5.
TuftsJ.Federal education—crystal ball. Paper presented at the 60th annual international convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, Houston, April 1982.
6.
VoeltzL. M.NeelR. S.A functional assessment of social performance, in preparation.
7.
BaileyJ. S.Wanted: A rational search for the limiting conditions of habilitation in the retarded. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1981, 1, 45–52.
8.
BarlowD. H.On the relation of clinical research to clinical practice: Current issues, new directions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1981, 49, 147–155.
9.
BaumeisterA. A.Mental retardation policy and research: The unfulfilled promise. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1981, 85, 449–456.
10.
BillingsleyF.WhiteO. R.MunsonR.Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 1980, 2, 229–241.
11.
BrownL.BranstonM. B.Hamre-NietupskiS.PumpianI.CertoN.GruenewaldL.A strategy for developing chronological-age-appropriate and functional curricular content for severely handicapped adolescents and young adults. Journal of Special Education, 1979, 13, 81–90.
12.
BrownL.NietupskiJ.Hamre-NietupskiS.The criterion of ultimate functioning and public school services for the severely handicapped student. In ThomasM. A. (Ed.), Hey, don't forget about me: Education's investment in the severely, profoundly, and multiply handicapped. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children, 1976.
13.
CarrE. G.Generalization of treatment effects following educational intervention with autistic children and youth. In WilcoxB.ThompsonA. (Eds.), Critical issues in educating autistic children and youth. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education, 1980.
14.
CronbachL. J.AmbronS. R.DornbuschS. M.HessR. D.HornikR. C.PhillipsD. C.WalkerD. F.WeinerS. S.Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods, and institutional arrangements. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
15.
DenoS. L.MirkinP. K.Data-based program modification: A manual. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1977.
16.
DunkinM. J.BiddleB. J.The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1974.
17.
EvansI. M.Behavioral assessment. In WalkerE. C. (Ed.), Handbook of clinical psychology: Theory, research and practice. Homewood, IL: Dorsey, 1982.
18.
FalveyM.BrownL.LyonS.BaumgartD.SchroederJ.Strategies for using cues and correction procedures. In SailorW.WilcoxB.BrownL. (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1980.
19.
FordA.BrownL.PumpianI.BaumgartD.NisbetJ.SchroederJ.LoomisR.Strategies for developing individualized recreation/leisure plans for adolescent and young adult severely handicapped students. In BrownL.FalveyM.PumpianI.BaumgartD.NisbetJ.FordA.SchroederJ.LoomisR. (Eds.), Curricular strategies for teaching severely handicapped students functional skills in school and nonschool environments. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison and Madison Metropolitan School District, 1980.
20.
GuessD.NoonanM. J.Curricula and instructional procedures for severely handicapped students. Focus on Exceptional Children, 1982, 14, 1–12.
21.
HayesS. C.Single case experimental design and empirical clinical practice. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1981, 49, 193–211.
22.
HersenM.BarlowD. H.Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. New York: Pergamon, 1976.
23.
HolvoetJ.BrownF.WelchP.YelenikG.FernandezL.GuessD.Evaluation of operant procedures (Statewide inservice training project for teachers of the severely multiply handicapped, Module 8). Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Department of Special Education, rev. 1980.
24.
HolvoetJ.GuessD.MulliganM.BrownF.The individualized curriculum sequencing model (II): A teaching strategy for severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 1980, 5, 337–351.
25.
KazdinA. E.Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1977, 1, 427–452.
26.
KazdinA. E.Drawing valid inferences from case studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1981, 49, 183–192.
27.
KazdinA. E.KopelS. A.On resolving ambiguities in the multiple-baseline design: Problems and recommendations. Behavior Therapy, 1975, 6, 601–608.
28.
KolkoD. J.DorsettP. G.MilanM. A.A total-assessment approach to the evaluation of social skills training: The effectiveness of an anger control program for adolescent psychiatric patients. Behavioral Assessment, 1981, 3, 383–402.
29.
LibertyK. A.HaringN. G.MartinM. M.Teaching new skills to the severely handicapped. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 1981, 6, 5–13.
30.
LovaasO.I.Teaching developmentally disabled children: The ME book. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1981.
31.
McCormickL.CooperM.GoldmanR.Training teachers to maximize instructional time provided to severely and profoundly handicapped children. AAESPH Review, 1979, 4, 301–310.
32.
MurphyR. J.BryanA. J.Multiple-baseline and multiple-probe designs: Practical alternatives for special education assessment and evaluation. Journal of Special Education, 1980, 14, 325–335.
33.
NeelR. S.Teaching autistic children: A functional curriculum approach. Seattle: University of Washington College of Education, 1981.
34.
ReichleJ.WilliamsW.VogelsbergT.WilliamsF.Curricula for the severely handicapped: Components and evaluation criteria. In WilcoxB.YorkR. (Eds.), Quality education for the severely handicapped. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education, 1980.
35.
RisleyT. R.Behavior modification: An experimental-therapeutic endeavor. In HamerlynckL. A.DavidsonP. O.AckerL. E. (Eds.), Behavior modification and ideal mental health services. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary Press, 1970.
36.
SackettG. P.Landesman-DwyerS.MorinV. N.Naturalistic observation in design and evaluation of special education programs. In KratochwillT. R. (Ed.), Advances in school psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981.
37.
SchreibmanL.KoegelR. L.MillsJ. I.BurkeJ. C.Social validation of behavior therapy with autistic children. Behavior Therapy, 1981, 12, 610–624.
38.
SnellM. E.Implementing and monitoring the IEP: Intervention strategies. In SnellM. E. (Ed.), Systematic instruction of the moderately and severely handicapped (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill, 1983.
39.
TharpR. G.The metamethodology of research and development. Educational Perspectives, 1981, 20, 42–48.
40.
VanDeventerP.YelinekN.BrownL.SchroederJ.LoomisR.GruenewaldL.A follow-up examination of severely handicapped graduates of the Madison Metropolitan School District from 1971–1978. In BrownL.BaumgartD.PumpianI.NisbetJ.FordA.LoomisR.SchroederJ. (Eds.), Curricular strategies that can be used to transition severely handicapped students from school to nonschool and post school environments. Madison: Madison Metropolitan School District, 1981.
41.
VoeltzL. M.EvansI. M.The assessment of behavioral interrelationships in child behavior therapy. Behavioral Assessment, 1982, 4, 131–165.
42.
VoeltzL. M.WuerchB. B.Monitoring multiple behavioral effects of leisure activities training on severely handicapped adolescents. In VoeltzL. M.ApffelJ. A.WuerchB. B. (Eds.), Leisure activities training for severely handicapped students: Instructional and evaluation strategies. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Department of Special Education, 1981.
43.
VoeltzL. M.WuerchB. B.BockhautC. H.Social validation of leisure time activities training with severely handicapped youth. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 1982, 1(4), 3–13.
44.
VoeltzL. M.WuerchB. B.WilcoxB.Leisure and recreation: Preparation for independence, integration and self-fulfillment. In WilcoxB.BellamyG. T., High school programs for severely handicapped students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1982.
45.
WahlerR. G.Some structural aspects of deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975, 8. 27–42.
46.
WehmanP.SchleienS.Leisure programs for handicapped persons. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1981.
47.
WhiteO. R.Adaptive performance objectives: Form versus function. In SailorW.WilcoxB.BrownL. (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1980. (a).
48.
WhiteO. R.Child assessment. In WilcoxB.YorkR. (Eds.), Quality education for the severely handicapped. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education, 1980. (b).
49.
WhiteO. R.HaringN. G.Exceptional teaching (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill, 1980.
50.
WilcoxB.BellamyG. T.Design of high school programs for severely handicapped students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1982.
51.
WolfM. M.Social validity: The case for subjective measurement, or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1978, 11, 203–214.
52.
WuerchB. B.VoeltzL. M.Longitudinal leisure skills for severely handicapped learners: The Ho 'onanea curriculum component. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1982.
53.
YeatonW. H.SechrestL.Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: Strength, integrity, and effectiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1981, 49, 156–167.
