The purpose of this study was to examine the startup of a charter elementary school specifically designed to be fully inclusive. Twenty-one adult stakeholders, including parents, teachers, staff, and an administrator, were interviewed and asked a series of questions designed to solicit information about what they identified as strengths and challenges in the first year of the school. Four major themes emerged from these interviews: Components critical to the operation of the school, initial challenges overcome, positive outcomes, and ongoing challenges. Areas of interest emerging from the study include the distribution of services for students with disabilities, the need for a challenging curriculum for all students, and the university–school district partnership.
AgranM.BlanchardC.WehmeyerM.HughesC. (2002). Increasing the problem-solving skills of students with developmental disabilities participating in general education. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 279–288.
2.
California Department of Education. (2003). California STAR Program [Data file]. Available from California Department of Education Website, http://star.cde.ca.gov/star2003/index.asp.
3.
CessnaK. K.SkibaR. J. (1996). Needs-based services: A responsible approach to inclusion. Preventing School Failure, 40, 117–123.
4.
CopelandS. R.McCallJ.WilliamsC. R.GuthC.CarterE. W.PesleyJ. A. (2002). High school peer buddies: A win–win situation. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(1), 16–21.
5.
CushingL.KennedyC. (1997). Academic effects of providing peer support in general education classrooms on students without disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 139–151.
6.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
DowningJ. E.EichingerJ.WilliamsL. (1997). Inclusive education for students with severe disabilities: Comparative views of principals and educators at different levels of implementation. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 133–142.
8.
DowningJ. E.MorrisonA. P.Berecin-RasconM. A. (1996). Including elementary school students with autism and intellectual impairments in their typical classrooms: Process and outcomes. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 24(2), 20–45.
9.
FioreT. A.HarwellL. M.BlackorbyJ.FinniganK. S. (2000). Charter schools and students with disabilities: A national study. Prepared for the Office of Educational Research and Improvement. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
10.
FisherM.MeyerL. H. (2002). Development and social competence after two years for students enrolled in inclusive and self-contained educational programs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 27, 165–174.
11.
FisherD.RyndakD. L. (2001). The foundations of inclusive education: A compendium of articles on effective strategies to achieve inclusive education. Baltimore: TASH.
12.
FisherD.SaxC.GroveK. A. (2000). The resilience of changes promoting inclusiveness in an urban elementary school. Elementary School Journal, 100, 213–227.
13.
FriendM.CookL. (2003). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
GlaserB.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
15.
GoesslingD. P. (1998). Inclusion and the challenge of assimilation for teachers of students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 238–251.
16.
HuntP.Farron-DavisF.BecksteadS.CurtisD.GoetzL. (1994). Evaluating the effects of placement of students with severe disabilities in general education versus special classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 200–214.
17.
HuntP.SotoG.MaierJ.DoeringK. (2003). Collaborative teaming to support students at risk and students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 69, 315–332.
18.
HuntP.StaubD.AlwellM.GoetzL. (1994). Achievement by all students within the context of cooperative learning groups. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 200–214.
19.
LevineM. (2002). A mind at a time. New York: Simon & Schuster.
20.
LincolnY.GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
LoganK.BakemanR.KeefeE. B. (1997). Effects of instructional variables on engaged behavior of students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 63, 481–498.
22.
McLeskeyJ.HenryD.HodgesD. (1998). Inclusion: Where is it happening?Teaching Exceptional Children, 31, 4–11.
23.
MeadowsN. B., (1999). A university–public school collaborative project for including students with learning and behavior problems in general education classrooms. In ScottiJ. R.MeyerL. H. (eds.), Behavioral intervention: Principles, models, and practices (pp. 175–194). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
MeyerL. H. (2001). The impact of inclusion on children's lives: Multiple outcomes, and friendship in particular. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 48, 9–31.
25.
PraterM. A.SileoT. W. (2002). School–university partnerships in special education field experiences: A national descriptive study. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 325–334.
26.
RhimL. M.McLaughlinM. J. (2000). Charter schools and special education: Balancing disparate visions. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED444297).
27.
RyndakD. L.DowningJ. E.JacquelineR.MorrisonA. P. (1995). Parents' perceptions after inclusion of their children with moderate or severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 147–157.
28.
SalendS. J.DuhaneyL. M. Garrick (1999). The impact of inclusion on students with and without disabilities and their educators. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 114–126.
29.
SalisburyC. L.McGregorG. (2002). The administrative climate and context of inclusive elementary schools. Exceptional Children, 68, 259–274.
30.
SalisburyC. L.PalombaroM. M.HollowoodT. M. (1993). On the nature and change of an inclusive elementary school. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18, 75–84.
31.
ThousandJ. S.VillaR. A. (2000). Collaborative teaming: A powerful tool in school restructuring. In VillaR. A.ThousandJ. S. (eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education: Piecing the puzzle together (2nd ed., pp. 7–37). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
32.
United States Department of Education. (2000, January). National Study of Charter Schools 2000—Fourth Year Report. Retrieved August 14, 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/charter4thyear/about.html.
33.
WaldronN. I.McLeskeyJ. (1998). The effects of an inclusive school program on students with mild and severe learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 395–405.
34.
WeigleK. L. (1997). Positive behavior support as a model for inclusion: Theoretical and procedural considerations. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 36–48.
35.
WeinerH. M. (2003). Effective inclusion: Professional development in the context of the classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(6), 12–18.
36.
WilsonS. M.FlodenR. W.Ferrini-MundyJ. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
