AltmanD. G. (2002). Poor quality medical research: What can journals do?Journal of the American Medical Association, 27, 2765–2767.
2.
AntonioR. J. (1989). The normative foundations of emancipatory theory: Evolutionary versus pragmatic perspectives. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 721–748.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
DeweyJ. (1976). Studies in logical theory. In BoydstonA. (Ed.). John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924 (Vol. 1, pp. 239–375). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published in 1903).
6.
Driver-LinnE., (2003). Where is psychology going? Structural fault lines revealed by psychologists' use of Kuhn. American Psychologist, 58, 269–278.
7.
GiangrecoM. F.TaylorS. J. (2003). “Scientifically based research” and qualitative inquiry. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 269–278.
8.
GierynT. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
HaffnerM. E.WhitleyJ.MosesM. (2002). Two decades of orphan product development. Nature Reviews, 1, 821–825.
10.
JamesW. (1975). Pragmatism. In BurkhardtF.BowersF.SkrupskelisI. K. (Eds.), William James: Pragmatism and the meaning of truth (pp. 1–166). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published in 1907).
11.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
PeirceC. S. (1934). How to make our ideas clear. In HartshorneC.WeissP. (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Pierce (Vol. 5, pp. 257–258). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1878).
13.
RortyR. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
SailorW.PaulJ. (in press) Framing positive behavior support in the ongoing discourse concerning the politics of knowledge. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions.
15.
ScrivenM. (1964). Views of human nature. In WannT. W. (Ed.). Behaviorism and phenomenology: Contrasting bases for modern psychology (pp. 163–183). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
ShavelsonR. J.TowneL., (Eds.) (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
17.
SkrticT. M. (Ed.). (1995). Disability and democracy: Reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity. New York: New York Teachers College Press.
18.
SkrticT. M.SailorW. (1996). School-linked services integration: Crisis and opportunity in the transition to postmodern society. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 271–283.
19.
SpoonerF.BrowderD. M. (2003). Scientifically based research in education and students with low incidence disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 271–283.