We discuss a participatory action research (PAR) approach to conducting family research. We conceptualize participatory action research as a collaborative process among researchers and stakeholders throughout the entire research sequence. Based on our five years of implementing PAR, we describe potential PAR advantages and challenges that need to be documented in future research. We propose a model of PAR implementation levels including the options of family members as research leaders and researchers as ongoing advisors, researchers and family members as coresearchers, and researchers as leaders, and family members as ongoing advisors. Finally, we discuss key implementation issues (i.e., defining stakeholders to include in the PAR process, maximizing benefits and minimizing drawbacks of diverse expertise, and addressing logistical considerations) with suggestions for effectively addressing them.
ArnsteinS. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224.
2.
BaileyD. (1994). Organizational empowerment: From self to interbeing. In GutiérrezL.NuriusP. (Eds.), Education and research for empowerment practice (pp. 37–44). Seattle: University of Washington, School of Social Work, Center for Policy and Practice Research.
BernheimK. F.SwitalskiT. (1988). Mental health staff and patients' relatives: How they view each other. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 39(6), 63–68.
5.
BlackardM. K.BarshE. T. (1982). Parents' and professionals' perceptions of the handicapped child's impact on the family. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7(2), 62–70.
6.
BruyèreS. M. (1993). Participatory action research: Overview and implications for family members of persons with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 3(2), 62–68.
7.
CarnineD. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63(4), 513–521.
8.
ChavkinN. F.WilliamsD. L. (1985). Parent involvement in education. School Social Work Journal, 10, 35–46.
9.
DohertyW. J.BossP. G.LaRossaR.SchummW. R.SteinmetzS. K. (1993). Family theories and methods: A contextual approach. In Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 3–30). New York: Plenum Press.
10.
FentonJ.BataviaA.RoodyD. (1993). Proposed policy statement for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research on constituency-oriented research and dissemination (CORD). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
11.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (1990). Making educational research more important. Exceptional Children, 57, 102–107.
12.
GravesW. H. (1991, September). Participatory action research: A new paradigm for disability and rehabilitation research. ARCA Newsletter, 19, 9–10.
13.
HallB. (1984). Research, commitment, and action: The role of participatory research. International Review of Education, 30, 289–299.
14.
HermaryM. E.RempleJ. (1990). Parental and staff perceptions of individual programming teams: Collaboration in and beyond the conference. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 25–32.
15.
HoshmandL. T.PolkinghorneD. E. (1992). Redefining the science-practice relationship and professional training. American Psychologist, 47(1), 55–66.
16.
JoeJ. R.MalachR. S. (1992). Families with Native American roots. In LynchE. W.HansonM. J. (Eds.), Developing cross-cultural competence: A guide for working with young children and their families (pp. 89–119). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
17.
KaufmanM.SchillerE.BirmanB.CoutinhoM. (1993). A federal perspective on improving practices, programs, and policies in special education. Evaluation and Program Planning, 16, 263–269.
18.
LatherP. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 257–277.
19.
LovittT. C.HigginsA. K. (1996). The gap: Research into practice. Teaching Exceptional Children, 28(2), 64–68.
20.
MarkeyU.SantelliB.TurnbullA. P. (in press). Participatory action research involving families from underserved communities and researchers: Respecting cultural and linguistic diversity. Multicultural Voices.
PopenoeD. (1988). Disturbing the nest: Family change and decline in modern societies. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
23.
SampleP. L. (1996). Beginnings: Participatory action research and adults with developmental disabilities. Disability & Society, 11, 317–332.
24.
SantelliB.SingerG. H. S.DiVenereN.GinsbergC.PowersL. E. (1998). Participatory action research: Reflections on critical incidents in a PAR project. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23(3), 211–222.
25.
SchwartzI. S.BaerD. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189–204.
26.
SpaniolL.JungH.ZippleA.FitzgeraldS. (1987). Families as a resource in the rehabilitation of the severely psychiatrically disabled. In HatfieldA. B.LefleyH. P. (Eds.), Families of the mentally ill: Coping and adaptation (pp. 167–190). New York: Guilford Press.
27.
TurnbullA. P.RuefM. B. (1996). Family perspectives on problem behavior. Mental Retardation, 34, 280–293.
28.
TurnbullA. P.TurbivilleV. P. (1993, September). Fathers' roles in intervention programs for children at special risks: Disabled, chronically ill, and children living in poverty. Paper presented at the National Research Council, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.
29.
TurnbullA. P.TurnbullH. R. (1985). Parents speak out-Then and now (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
30.
U. S. Department of Education, Direct Grant Programs and Fellowship Programs, 62 Fed. Reg. 52430 (1997).
31.
WhyteW. F. (Ed.). (1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
Whitney-ThomasJ. (1997). Participatory action research as an approach to enhancing quality of life for individuals with disabilities. In SchalockR. L. (Ed.), Quality of life: Vol. II. Application to persons with disabilities (pp. 181–197). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
33.
YeichS.LevineR. (1992). Participatory research's contribution to a conceptualization of empowerment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(24), 1894–1908.
34.
ZarbG. (1992). On the road to Damascus: First steps towards changing the relations of disability research production. Disability, Handicap, & Society, 7(2), 125–138.
