The purpose of this study was to determine how the needs of students with disabilities are addressed by state coordinators of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) during professional development activities on positive behavioral strategies, school-wide systems, and school-wide commitment to the PBIS approach. Particular attention was given to how the needs of students with severe disabilities were addressed throughout training opportunities. Although an overwhelming majority (93%) of the state coordinators believed that students with severe disabilities can participate at least partially in schoolwide PBIS programs, they indicated that this belief was not reflected in their state's PBIS initial professional development activities.
BambaraL.LohrmannS. (2006). Introduction to a special issue on severe disabilities and school-wide positive behavior support. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 1–3.
2.
BambaraL. M.KernL. (2005). Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior support plans. New York: The Guilford Press.
3.
CarrE. G.DunlapG.HornerR. H.KoegelR. L.TurnbullA. P.SailorW. (2002). Positive behavior support: Evolution of an applied science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 4–16, 20.
4.
CarrE. G.HornerR. H.TurnbullA. P.MarquisJ. G.McLaughlinD. M.McAteeM. L. (1999). Positive behavior support for people with developmental disabilities: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
DillmanD. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
7.
FisherD.RyndakD. L. (Eds.) (2001). Foundations of inclusive education: A compendium of articles on effective strategies to achieve inclusive education. Baltimore, MD: TASH.
8.
FreemanR.EberL.AndersonC.IrvinL.HornerR.BoundsM. (2006). Building inclusive school cultures using school-wide positive behavior support: Designing effective individual support systems for students with significant disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 4–17.
9.
FullanM. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
GayL. R.MillsG. E.AirasianP. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
11.
HawkenL. S.O'NeillR. E. (2006). Including students with severe disabilities in all levels of school-wide positive behavior support. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 46–53.
12.
JacksonL.RyndakD. L.BillingsleyF. (2000). Useful practices in inclusive education: A preliminary view of what experts in moderate and severe disabilities are saying. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 25, 129–141.
13.
JacksonL.RyndakD. L.WehmeyerM. (2009). The dynamic relationship between context, curriculum, and student learning: A case for inclusive education as a research-based practice. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33–34, 175–195.
14.
LewisT.SugaiG. (1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive school-wide management. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31, 1–23.
15.
NelsonR.SugaiG. (1999). School-wide application of positive behavioral supports. In SugaiG.LewisT. (Eds.), Developing positive behavioral support for students challenging behaviors (pp. 25–44). Reston, VA: Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders.
16.
NetzelD.EberL. (2003). Shifting from reactive to proactive discipline in an urban school district: A change of focus through PBS implementation. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5, 71–79.
17.
OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Effective School-Wide Interventions. Positive behavior interventions and supports. Retrieved January 11, 2011, from www.pbis.org/about_us/default.aspx.
18.
RyndakD. L.FisherD. (Eds.) (2003). The foundations of inclusive education: A compendium of articles on effective strategies to achieve inclusive education (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
19.
RyndakD. L.MooreM.DelanoM.OrlandoA. (2010). Access to the general curriculum: The mandate and the role of context in research-based practice. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33–34, 199–213.
20.
RyndakD. L.ReardonR.BennerS.WardT. (2007). Transitioning to district-wide inclusive services: The ongoing journey and its accompanying complexities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32, 228–246.
SarasonS. (1982). The culture of the school and the problem of change (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
23.
ScottT. (2001). A schoolwide example of positive behavioral support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3, 88–94.
24.
ScottT.EberL. (2003). Functional assessment and wraparound as systematic school processes: Primary, secondary, and tertiary systems examples. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5, 131–143.
25.
SnellM. E. (2006). What's the verdict: Are students with severe disabilities included in school-wide positive behavior support?Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 62–65.
26.
SugaiG.HornerR.SailorW.DunlapG.EberL.LewisT. (2005). School-wide positive behavior support: Implementers' blueprint and self-assessment. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
27.
SugaiG.HornerR. H.DunlapG.HienemanM.LewisT.NelsonC. M. (2000). Applying positive behavior support and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 131–143.
28.
Taylor-GreeneS.KartubD. (2000). Durable implementation of school-wide behavior support: The high five program. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 233–235.
