AaronsA.G., & BrownS.A., & SticeE., & CoeM.T. (2001): Psychometric evaluation of the marijuana and stimulant effect expectancy questionnaires for adolescents. Addictive Behaviors (26): 219–236
2.
AdamsL.B., & MartinB.R. (1996): Cannabis: pharmacology and toxicology in animals and humans. Addiction (91): 1585–1614
3.
AjzenI. (1991): The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (50): 179–211
4.
BrookU., & FeiginR., & ShererD., & GevaD. (2001): Prevalence. Attitudes and knowledge of high school pupils towards drugs and other addictions: implications for school health education in Israel. Patient Education and Counseling (43): 199–209
5.
Como-LeskoN., & PrimaveraL., & SzeszkoP. (1994): Marijuana usage in relation to harmfulness ratings, perceived likelihood of negative consequences, and defense mechanisms in high-school students. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (20): 301–315
6.
FabriciousW.V., & NagoshiC.T., & MacKinnonD. (1993): Beliefs about the harmfulness of drug use in adults who use different drugs. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (7): 52–65
7.
FischoffB., & SlovicP., & LichtensteinS., & ReadS., & CombsB. (1978): How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences (9): 127–152
8.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (1975): Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
9.
JolmstonL.D. (2000): Selecting variables and measures for drug surveys. In: WHO. Guide to Drug Abuse Epidemiology.Geneva: World Health Organization
10.
JolmstonL. D., & O'MalleyP. M., & BachmanJ. G., & SchulenbergJ.E. (2007): Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2006.Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse
11.
KalantH. (2001): The pharmacology and toxicology of “ecstasy” (MDMA) and related drugs. CMAJ (165): 917–928
12.
KarlssonP. (2006): Margins of prevention. On older adolescents’ positive and negative beliefs about illicit drug use.Stockholm: Stockholm University
13.
LeemingD., & HanleyM., & LyttleS. (2002): Young people's images of cigarettes, alcohol and drugs. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy (9): 169–185
14.
LentonS., & BoysA., & NorcrossK. (1997): Raves, drugs and experience: drug use by a sample of people who attend raves in Western Australia. Addiction (92): 1327–1337
15.
LoewensteinG.F., & LernerJ.S. (2003): The role of affect in decision making. In: Davidson, R.J. & Scherer. K.R. & Goldsmith, H.H. Handbook of affective sciences.Oxford: University Press
MillsteinS., & Halpern-FelsherB. (2002): Perceptions of risk and vulnerability. Journal of Adolescent Health (31): 10–27
18.
ParkerH., & AldridgeJ., & MeashamF. (1998): Illegal leisure: The normalization of adolescent recreational drug use.London: Routledge
19.
Peretti-WatelP. (2005): Cannabis use, beliefs about “hard drugs” and “soft drugs”, and the ineffectiveness of anti-drug interventions in French high-schools. Health Education Journal (64): 142–153
20.
PetersE., & VästfjällD., & GärlingT., & SlovicP. (2006): Affect and decision making: A “hot” topic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (19): 79–85
21.
RogersR.W. (1975): A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology (91): 93–114
22.
RosenstockI. (1974): The health belief model and preventive behavior. Health Education Monographs (2): 354–386
23.
SlovicP., & FinucaneM.L., & PetersE., & MacGregorD.G. (2007): The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research (177): 1333–1352
24.
StacyA.W, & GalaifE.R., & SussmanS., & DentC.W. (1996): Self-generated drug out-comes in high-risk adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (10): 18–27
25.
SwadiH. (1990): Validating and improving the validity of self-reports in adolescent substance misuse surveys. Journal of Drug Issues (20): 473–486
26.
ViscusiW.K. (2000): Comment: The perils of qualitative smoking risk measures. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (13): 267–271
27.
ViswanathanM. (2005): Measurement error and research design.Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications
28.
WeinsteinN. (1989): Optimistic biases about personal risk. Science (246): 1232–1233
29.
WeinsteinN. (1993): Testing four competing theories of health protective behaviour. Health Psychology (12): 324–333
30.
WeinsteinN. (1999): What does it mean to understand a risk?Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs (25): 15–20
31.
WeisbergH.F. (2005): The total survey error approach. A guide to the new science of survey research.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
32.
WindshitlP.D., & WellsG.L. (1996): Measuring psychological uncertainty: verbal versus numeric methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied (2): 343–364
33.
ZajoncR.B. (1980): Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist (35): 151–175.