This study compared data quality and response rates for the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in a web-based versus in a paper-and-pencil format survey.
SETTING
Subjects were randomised to one of two parallel samples, one web-based and the other paper-based. Data were collected during 2009.
Results
The web-based format yielded a lower response rate compared to the paper version (26.2% vs. 53.6%), internal consistency was quite similar (0.82 vs. 0.77), while the mean AUDIT scores were higher in the web-based format for both men and women.
Conclusions
Future studies should focus on methods for combining different administration methods in order to maximize response rates.
References
1.
BaborT., & Higgings-BiddleJ., & SaundersJ., & MonteiroM. (2001): AUDIT, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in primary care.Geneva: WHO
2.
BasonJ. (2000): Comparison of telephone mail, web, and IVR surveys of drug and alcohol use among university of Georgia students. Paper presented at the American Associations of Public Opinion Research
3.
BergmanH., & KällménH. (2002): Alcohol use among Swedes and a psychometric evaluation of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Alcohol and Alcoholism37: 245–251
4.
BergmanH., & KällménH. (2003): Svenska kvinnor har fått mer riskfyllda och skadligare alkoholvanor. Undersökning av förändringar i svenskarnas alkoholvanor åren 1997–2001. (Swedish women show more hazardous and harmful alcohol habits. Investigation of changes in Swede's alcohol habits during the period 1997–2001). Läkartidningen100: 1028–1035
5.
CaetanoR. (2001): Non-response in alcohol and drug surveys: a research topic in need of further attention. Addiction96: 1541–1545
6.
FindahlO. (2007): Sverige i Europa (Sweden in Europe).Hudiksvall: World Internet Institute
7.
FindahlO. (2008a): Svenskarna och internet 2007 (The Swedes and Internet 2007).Hudiksvall: World Internet Institute
8.
FindahlO. (2008b): Internet i ett internationellt perspektiv – Del 2. Sverige i världen (Internet in an international perspective – Part 2. Sweden in the world).Hudiksvall: World Internet Institute
9.
KypriK., & GallagherS. (2003): Incentives to increase participation in an Internet survey of alcohol use: a controlled experiment. Alcohol & Alcoholism38: 437–441
10.
KypriK., & StephensonS., & LangleyJ. (2004): Assesment of Non-response Bias in an Internet Survey of Alcohol Use. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research28: 630–634
11.
KällménH., & WennbergP., & BermanA.H., & BergmanH. (2007): Alcohol habits in Sweden during 1997–2005, as measured with the AUDIT. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry61: 466–470
12.
LinkM., & MokdadA. (2005): Effects of survey mode on self-reports of adult alcohol consumption: Comparison of web, mail and telephone approaches. Journal of Studies on Alcohol66: 239–245
13.
McCabeS., & BoydC., & CouperM., & Craw-fordS., & D'ArcyH. (2002): Mode effects for collecting alcohol and other drug use data: Web and U.S. mail. Journal of Studies on Alcohol63: 755–761
14.
McCabeS. E., & DiezA., & BoydC.J., & NelsonT.F., & WeitzmanE.R. (2006): Comparing web and mail responses in a mixed mode survey in college alcohol use research. Addictive behaviors31: 1619–1627
15.
MillerE. T., & NealD. J., & RobertsL. J., & BaerJ. S., & CresslerS. O., & MetrikJ. (2002): Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between Internet-based assessment and traditional methods?Psychology of Addictive Behaviors16: 56–63
16.
SaundersJ.B., & AaslandO.G., & BaborT.F. & De La FuenteJ.R., & GrantM. (1993): Development of Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption – II. Addiction88: 791–804
17.
SelinK.H. (2006): Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): What does it screen for? Performance of the AUDIT against four different criteria in a Swedish population sample. Substance use & Misuse41: 1181–1189
18.
SinadinovicK., & WennbergP., & BermanA.H. (2011): Population screening of risky alcohol and drug use via Internet and Interactive Voice Response (IVR): A feasibility and psychometric study in a random sample. Drug and Alcohol Dependence114(1): 55–60
19.
WangY. C., & LeeC. M., & Lew-TingC. Y., & HsiaoC. K., & ChenD. R., & ChenW.J. (2005): Survey of substance use among high school students in Taipei: Web-based questionnaire versus paper-and-pencil questionnaire. Journal of Adolescent Health37: 289–295
20.
WernerP. (2005): On the Cost-Efficiency of Probability Sampling Based Mail Surveys with a Web Response Option.Linköping: University of Linköping
21.
WrightD. L., & AquilinoW. S., & SuppleA.I. (1998): A comparison of computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaires in a survey on smoking, alcohol, and other drug use. Public Opinion Quarterly62: 331–353.
