The objective of the study was to explore perceptions of different addictions among Swedish addiction care personnel.
Data
A survey was conducted with 655 addiction care professionals in the social services, health care and criminal care in Stockholm County. Respondents were asked to rate the severity of nine addictions as societal problems, the individual risk to getting addicted, the possibilities for self-change and the perceived significance of professional treatment in finding a solution.
Results
The images of addiction proved to vary greatly according to its object. At one end of the spectrum were addictions to hard drugs, which were judged to be very dangerous to society, highly addictive and very hard to quit. At the other end of the spectrum were smoking and snuff use, which were seen more as bad habits than real addictions. Some consistent differences were detected between respondents from different parts of the treatment system. The most obvious was a somewhat greater belief in self-change among social services personnel, a greater overall change pessimism among professionals in the criminal care system and a somewhat higher risk perception and stronger emphasis on the necessity of treatment among medical staff.
Conclusion
Professionals' views in this area largely coincide with the official governing images displayed in the media, and with lay peoples' convictions.
AnderssonB., FlorellL., & SamuelssonE. (2004). Inställningar till självläkning – en studie av diskurser kring beroendeprob-lematik [Perceptions of natural recovery – a study of discourses of addiction problems]. (Report no. 6). Stockholm: Social Services Administration Research and Development Unit.
2.
BergmarkA., & OscarssonL. (1988). Drug misuse and treatment: A study of social conditions and contextual strategies.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
3.
BlomqvistJ. (1998). Beyond treatment? Widening the approach to alcohol problems and solutions.Stockholm: Stockholm University.
4.
BlomqvistJ. (2004). Sweden's “war on drugs” in the light of addicts' own experiences. In RosenqvistP., BlomqvistJ., Koski-JännesA., & ÖjesjöL. (Eds.), Addiction and Life Course (pp. 139–172). Helsinki: NAD Publication.
5.
BlomqvistJ. (2009). What is the worst thing you could get hooked on? Popular images of addiction problems in contemporary Sweden.Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs,26(4), 373–398.
6.
BlomqvistJ. (2012). Perceptions of addiction and recovery in Sweden: The influence of respondent characteristics.Addiction Research and Theory,20(5), 435–446.
7.
BlomqvistJ., CunninghamJ., WallanderL., & CollinL. (2007). Att förbättra sina alko-holvanor. Om olika mönster för förändring och om vad vården betyder [Improving one's drinking habits. On various change patterns and the significance of treatment]. (SoRAD research report no. 42). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
8.
BlomqvistJ., PalmJ., & StorbjörkJ. (2009). “More cure and less control” or “more care and lower costs”? Recent changes in services for problem drug users in Stockholm and Sweden.Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy,14(6), 479–496.
9.
ChristophsI. (2009) (Ed.). Mot en bättre missbrukarvård? [Towards better addiction care?] (SoRAD research report no. 57). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
10.
CunninghamJ.A. (2009, June). Societal images of addiction – first results from a Canadian representative survey. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Alcohol Epidemiology Symposium of the Kettil Bruun Society, Copenhagen.
11.
CunninghamJ.A., SobellL.C., & SobellM.B. (1998). Awareness of self-change as a pathway to recovery from alcohol problems: Results from five different groups.Addictive Behaviours,23(3), 399–404.
12.
CunninghamJ.A., SobellL.C., & SobellM.B. (1999). Changing perceptions about self-change and moderate-drinking recoveries from alcohol problems: What can and should be done?Journal of Applied Social Psychology,29(2), 291–299.
13.
HackingI. (1999). The social construction of what?London: Harvard University Press.
14.
Hirschovits-GerzT., HolmaK., Koski-JännesA., RaitasaloK., BlomqvistJ., CunninghamJ.A., & PervovaI. (2011). Is there something peculiar about Finnish views on alcohol addiction? – A cross-cultural comparison between four northern populations.Research on Finnish Society, 4, 41–54.
15.
HolmaK., Koski-JännesA., RaitasaloK., BlomqvistJ., PervovaI., & CunninghamJ.A. (2011). Perceptions of addictions as societal problems in Canada, Sweden, Finland and St. Petersburg, Russia.European Addiction Research, 17, 106–112.
16.
HübnerL. (2001). Narkotika och alkohol i den allmänna opinionen. [Drugs and alcohol in the public opinion]. (Doctoral dissertation). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
17.
HumphreysK., & TuckerJ. A. (2002). Toward more responsive and effective intervention systems for alcohol-related problems.Addiction,97(2), 126–132.
18.
KlingemannH. (1992). Coping and maintenance strategies of spontaneous remitters from problem use of alcohol and heroin in Switzerland.International Journal of the Addictions, 27, 1359–88.
19.
KlingemannH. (2003, August-September). How optimistic are the hairdresser and the lawyer about addicts ‘kicking their habit’ on their own? Public images on natural recovery from addiction in Switzerland, Columbia and Germany. The Societal Images of Natural Recovery from Addiction (SINR). Paper presented at the Summer Academy, Social Work and Society, St. Petersburg.
20.
KlingemannH., & KlingemannJ. (2007). Hostile and favourable societal climates for self-change: some lessons for policymakers. In KlingemannH., & SobellL. C. (Eds.), Promoting self-change from addictive behaviors (pp. 187–212). New York: Springer.
Koski-JännesA., Hirschovits-GerzT., & PennonenM. (2012). Population, professional, and client support for different models of managing addictive behaviors.Substance Use and Misuse, 47, 296–308.
23.
Koski-JännesA., Hirschovits-GerzT., PennonenM., & NyyssönenM. (2009, June). Representations of addictions from inside and outside. The case of Finland. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Alcohol Epidemiology Symposium of the Kettil Bruun Society, Copenhagen.
24.
Koski-JännesA., Hirschovits-GerzT., PennonenM., & NyyssönenM. (2012). Population, professional and client views on the dangerousness of addictions: testing the familiarity hypothesis.Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs,29(2), 139–154.
25.
National Board of Health, and Welfare (2004). Insatser och klienter i behandlingsenheter inom missbrukarvården den 1 april 2003 – “1KB 2003” [Services and clients in substance misuse treatment units]. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
26.
National Council for Crime Prevention (2008). Behandling av narkotikamissbrukare i fängelse [Treatment of narcotic misusers in prison] (Rapport 2008:18). Stockholm: Fritzes.
27.
PalmJ. (2004). The nature of and responsibility for alcohol and drug problems: Views among treatment staff.Addiction Research and Theory,12(5), 413–431.
28.
PeeleS. (1985). The meaning of addiction. Compulsive experience and its interpretation.Toronto: Lexington Books.
29.
RoomR. (1978). Governing images of alcohol and drug problems: Structure, sources and sequels of conceptualizations of intractable problems. (Doctoral dissertation). Berkeley: University of California.
30.
WallanderL., & BlomqvistJ. (2005). Who “needs” compulsory care? A factorial survey of Swedish social workers' assessments of clients in relation to the care of abusers (Special Provisions) act.Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs,22 (English supplement), 63–85.
