Abstract
References
1.
Chang, T. and Kott, P.S. (2008). Using Calibration Weighting to Adjust for Nonresponse Under a Plausible Model. Biometrika, 95, 557-571.
2.
D’Arrigo, J. and Skinner, C. (2010). Linearization Variance Estimation for Generalized Raking Estimators in the Presence of Nonresponse. Survey Methodology, 36, 181-192.
3.
Deville, J.-C. (2000). Generalized Calibration and Application to Weighting for Non- Response. Compstat: Proceedings in Computational Statistics; 14th Symposium Held in Utrecht, The Netherlands, J.G. Bethlehem and P.G.M. Van Der Heijden (eds). Physica Verlag: Heidelberg, 65-76.
4.
Fuller, W.A. (1984). Least Squares and Related Analyses for Complex Survey Designs.
5.
Survey Methodology, 10, 97-118.
6.
Korn, E.L. and Graubard, B.I. (1993). Response to “Bias in Weighted Versus Unweighted Estimates.”. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 1351.
7.
Kott, P.S. (2012). Why One Should Incorporate the Design Weights When Adjusting for Nonresponse Using Response Homogeneity Groups. Survey Methodology, 95-99.
8.
Kott, P.S. and Liao, D. (2012). Providing Double Protection for Unit Nonresponse with a Nonlinear Calibration-weighting Routine. Survey Research Methods, 6, 105-111.
9.
RTI International (2012). SUDAAN Language Manual, Release 11.0. Research Triangle Park. NC: RTI International.