Acceptance Patterns of Retaliatory Aggression among Adjudicated Youth by Sex and Race

Abstract

This study investigates sex and race differences in normative beliefs about the acceptability of aggression across dimensions of severity of provocation (weak versus strong) and sex of provoker (male versus female). Students in the sample of 311 included those required to attend three Department of Youth Services schools after placement by the juvenile court system from across the state of Alabama (N = 392). Results show that males were significantly more likely than females to approve of retaliation to weak provocation and against females. There were no significant differences between males and females for retaliation with strong provocation and against males. Results also show the Black group was significantly more likely than the White group to approve of retaliation to weak provocation, strong provocation, and against females.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

(1998) The social ecology of youth violence. Crime and Justice, 24, 65–104.

Crick

N. R.

Grotpeter

J. K.

(1995) Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.

Durkin

(1995) Developmental social psychology: from infancy to old age. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.

Epstein

J. A.

Botvin

G. J.

Diaz

Williams

Griffin

(2000) Aggression, victimization and problem behavior among inner-city minority adolescents. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 9, 51–66.

Feigelman

Howard

D. E.

Cross

S. I.

(2000) Psychosocial and environmental correlates of violence perpetration among African-American urban youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27, 202–209.

Hilton

N. Z.

Grant

T. H.

Rice

M. E.

(2000) The functions of aggression by male teenagers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 988–994.

Huesmann

L. R.

Guerra

N. G.

(1997) Children's normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 408–419.

Lindesmith

A. R.

Strauss

Denzin

N. K.

(1999) Social psychology. (8th ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Maccoby

E. E.

Jacklin

C. N.

(1980) Sex differences in aggression: a rejoinder and reprise. Child Development, 51, 964–980.

10.

McConville

D. W.

Cornell

D. G.

(2003) Aggressive attitudes predict aggressive behavior in middle school students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 179–187.

11.

Morash

(1986) Gender, peer group experiences, and seriousness of delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23, 43–67.

12.

Owens

Shute

Slee

(2000) “I'm in and you're out …”: explanations for teenage girls' indirect aggression. Psychology, Evolution and Gender, 2, 19–46.

13.

Simons

K. J.

Paternite

C. E.

Shore

(2001) Quality of parent/adolescent attachment and aggression in young adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 182–203.

14.

Vazsonyi

A. T.

Vesterdal

W. J.

Flannery

D. J.

Blliston

(1999) The utility of child self-reports and teacher ratings in classifying children's official delinquency status. Studies on Crime and Prevention, 8, 225–244.

15.

Ward

J. V.

(1988) Urban adolescents' conceptions of violence. In Gilligan

Ward

J. V.

Taylor

J. M.

Bardige

(Eds.), Mapping the moral domain: a contribution of women's thinking to psychological theory in education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press. Pp. 170–200.