Permutation procedures to compute exact and resampling probability values associated with measures of association for ordered r × c contingency tables are described. Comparisons with asymptotic probability values demonstrated that exact and resampling permutation procedures were preferred for sparse contingency tables.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakemanR.RobinsonB. F.QueraV. (1996) Testing sequential association: estimating exact p values using sampled permutations. Psychological Methods, 1, 4–15.
2.
BurrE. J. (1960) The distribution of Kendall's score S for a pair of tied rankings. Biometrika, 47, 151–171.
3.
GoodP. I. (2000) Permutation tests: a practical guide to resampling methods for testing hypotheses. (2nd ed.) New York: Springer-Verlag.
4.
GoodP. I. (2001) Resampling methods: a practical guide to data analysis. (2nd ed.) Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.
5.
GoodmanL. A.KruskalW. H. (1954) Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732–764.
6.
HolfordT. R. (2003) Editorial: exact methods for categorical data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 12, 1.
7.
HolmesC. B. (1979) Sample size in psychological research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 283–288.
8.
HolmesC. B. (1990) The honest truth about lying with statistics. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
9.
KendallM. G. (1962) Rank correlation methods. (3rd ed.) New York: Hafner.
10.
LunneborgC. E. (2000) Data analysis by resampling: concepts and applications. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
11.
ManlyB. F. J. (1997) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. (2nd ed.) London: Chapman & Hall.
12.
MielkeP. W.Jr.BerryK. J. (2001) Permutation methods: a distance function approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.
13.
EatefieldW. M. (1981) Algorithm AS 159: an efficient method of generating random R × C tables with given row and column totals. Applied Statistics, 30, 91–97.
14.
ReadT. R. C.CressieN. A. C. (1988) Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. New York: Springer-Verlag.
15.
SomersR. H. (1962) A new asymmetric measure of association for ordinal variables. American Sociological Review, 27, 799–811.
16.
StuartA. (1953) The estimation and comparison of strengths of association in contingency tables. Biometrika, 40, 105–110.
