As some authors have noticed in fields other than psychology, level of measurement and distributional characteristics of count data are commonly not taken into account, so that they are analysed as normally distributed continuous variables, and therefore some general linear model is applied. In this work, we review a random sample of 457 articles published in the last four years in journals with the highest impact factor in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR Social Sciences Edition) of the Institute for Scientific Information. The goals are to know how often count variables appear in psychological applied research and which data analyses are used when dealing with count response variables. Examination showed that there is a notable presence of count variables, especially in some topics in psychology and a remarkable misapplication of the general linear model. One deals with causes and consequences of this approach to data analysis and suggests the use of specific models to analyse count data.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. (1994) Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. (4th ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychological Association. (2001) Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. (5th ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
3.
BartholomewD. J. (1995) What is statistics?Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 158, 1–20.
4.
BiggeriA.MarchiM.LagazioC.MartuzziM.BöhningD. (2000) Nonparametric maximum likelihood estimators for disease mapping. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 2539–2554.
5.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K. (1986) Econometric models based on count data: comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 29–53.
6.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K. (1990) Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 347–364.
7.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K. (1998) Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press.
8.
CapraroM. M.CapraroR. M. (2003) Exploring the APA fifth edition publication manual's impact on the analytic preferences of journal editorial board members. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 554–565.
9.
CoxJ. L.HeyseJ. F.TukeyJ. W. (2000) Efficacy estimates from parasite count data that include zero counts. Experimental Parasitology, 96, 1–8.
García-CrespoD. (2001) Promotions in the Spanish labour market: differences by gender. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, 599–615.
12.
GardnerW.MulveyE. P.ShawE. C. (1995) Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 392–404.
13.
GreeneW. H. (2002) LIMDEP Version 8.0 reference guide. New York: Econometric Software, Inc.
14.
HamJ.VonkR. (2003) Smart and easy: co-occurring activation of spontaneous trait inferences and spontaneous situational inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 434–447.
15.
IhakaR.GentlemanR. (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5, 299–314.
16.
Insightful Corp. (2001) S-Plus for Windows user's guide. Seattle, WA: Author.
17.
KiersH. A. L. (2002) Categorization is not the only way: a comment on Rodrigo and Ato: testing the group polarization hypothesis by using logit models. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 19–26.
18.
KingG. (1988) Statistical models for political science event counts: bias in conventional procedures and evidence for exponential Poisson regression model. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 838–863.
19.
KleinbaumD. G.KupperL. L.MullerK. E. (1988) Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. (2nd ed.) Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
20.
LaheyB. B.LoeberR.BurkeJ.RathouzP. J.McBurnettK. (2002) Waxing and waning in concert: dynamic comorbidity of conduct disorder with other disruptive and emotional problems over 7 years among clinic-referred boys. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 556–567.
21.
LambertD. (1992) Zero-inflated Poisson regression with an application to defects in manufacturing. Pechnometrics, 34, 1–14.
22.
LanderlK.BevanA.ButterworthB. (2004) Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8-9-year-old students. Cognition, 93, 99–125.
23.
LiangK. Y.ZegerS. L. (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using general linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13–22.
24.
LiaoT. F. (1994) Interpreting probability models: logit, probit and other generalized linear models. London: Sage.
25.
LindseyJ. K. (1995) Modelling frequency and count data. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
26.
LindseyJ. K. (1998) Counts and times to events. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 1745–1751.
27.
LindseyJ. K.JonesB.JarvisP. (2001) Some statistical issues in modelling pharmacokinetic data. Statistics in Medicine, 20, 2775–2783.
28.
LongJ. S. (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
LunneborgC. E. (1994) Modelling experimental and observational data. Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
30.
MacDonaldA. W.CarterC. S. (2003) Event-related fMRI study of context processing in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of patients with schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 689–697.
31.
MaxwellS. E. (2004) The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: causes, consequences and remedies. Psychological Methods, 9, 147–163.
32.
McCullaghP.NelderJ. A. (1989) Generalized linear models. (2nd ed.) London: Chapman & Hall.
33.
MebaneW. R.SekhinJ. S. (2004) Robust estimation and outlier detection for overdispersed multinomial models of count data. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 392–411.
34.
MelicianiV. (2000) The relationship between R&D, investment and patents: a panel data analysis. Applied Economics, 32, 1429–1437.
35.
MelkerssonM.RoothD. O. (2000) Modelling female fertility using inflated count data models. Journal of Population Economics, 13, 189–203.
36.
MullahyJ. (1997) Heterogeneity, excess zeros, and the structure of count data models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12, 337–350.
37.
NavarroA.UtzetF.PuigP.CaminalJ.MartínM. (2001) La distribución binomial negativa frente a la de Poisson en el análisis de fenómenos recurrentes. Gaceta Sanitaria, 15, 447–452.
38.
NelderJ. A.WedderburnW. M. (1972) Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 135, 370–384.
39.
NorusisM. J. (2005) SPSS 13.0 Advanced statistical procedures companion. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40.
OsgoodD. W. (2000) Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(1), 21–43.
41.
RodrigoM. F.AtoM. (2002) Polarization is first and foremost a categorical phenomenon: a comment on Kiers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 27–34.
42.
RussellC. J.DeanM. A. (2000) To log or not to log: bootstrap as an alternative to parametric estimation of moderation effects in the presence of skewed dependent variables. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 167–185.
43.
SAS Institute. (1999) SAS/SPAT user's guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
44.
SerlinR. C.HarwellM. R. (2004) More powerful test of predictor subsets in regression analysis under nonnormality. Psychological Methods, 9, 492–509.
45.
SturmanM. C. (1999) Multiple approaches to analyzing count data in studies of individual differences: the propensity for Type I errors, illustrated with the case of absenteeism prediction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 414–430.
46.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001) Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.) Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
47.
ThomsonB. (2002) Exploring the APA fifth edition publication manual's impact on the analytic preferences of journal editorial board members. Educational Researcher, 31, 24–31.
