Prior attempts to condition a one-celled organism, paramecium, by either classical or instrumental procedures have yielded both positive and negative results. As the results of those studies may be subject to several interpretations other than one indicating learning, it was decided to use a more traditional technique for the present study. This experiment was designed to assess whether aversive electric shock could be used to train paramecia on a brightness discrimination task, a procedure that has been used in animal learning research. The results indicated that such learning may have occurred.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ApplewhiteP. B. (1979) Learning in protozoa. In LevandowskyM.HunterS. H. (Eds.), Biochemistry and physiology of protozoa. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 341–355.
2.
ApplewhiteP. B.GardnerE. T. (1973) Tube escape behavior of paramecia. Behavioral Biology, 9, 245–250.
3.
ArmusH. L.MontgomeryA. R. (2001) Aversive and attractive properties of electrical stimulation for Paramecium caudatum. Psychological Reports, 89, 342–344.
4.
BramstedtF. (1935) Dressurversuche mit Paramecium caudatum und Stylonychia mytilus. [Training experiments with Paramecium caudatum and Stylonychia mytilus]. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie, 22, 490–516.
5.
CorningW. C.Von BurgR. (1973) Protozoa. In CorningW. C.DyalJ. A.WillowsA. O. D. (Eds.), Invertebrate learning. New York: Plenum. Pp. 49–122.
6.
FrenchJ. W. (1940) Trial and error learning in Paramecium. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 609–613.
7.
GelberB. (1952) Investigations of the behavior of Paramecium aurelia: I. Modification of behavior after training with reinforcement. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 45, 58–65.
8.
GelberB. (1956) Investigations of the behavior of Paramecium Aurelia: III. The effect of the presence and absence of light on the occurrence of a response. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 88, 31–36.
9.
GelberB. (1957) Food or training in the paramecium?Science, 126, 1340–1341.
10.
GelberB. (1958) Retention in Paramecium aurelia. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 51, 110–115.
11.
GelberB. (1962a) Acquisition in Paramecium aurelia during spaced training. Psychological Record, 12, 165–177.
12.
GelberB. (1962b) Reminiscence and the trend of retention in Paramecium aurelia. Psychological Record, 12, 179–192.
13.
GrabowskiU. (1939) Experimentelle Untersuchungen über das angebliche Lernvermoegen von Paramaecium. [Experimental studies on the alleged learning ability of the Paramecium]. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 2, 265–282.
14.
HanzelT. E.RuckerW. (1971) Escape training in paramecia. Journal of Biological Psychology, 13, 24–28.
15.
HinkleD. J.WoodD. C. (1994) Is tube-escape learning by protozoa associative learning?Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 94–99.
16.
HuberJ. C.RuckerW. B.McDiarmidC. G. (1974) Retention of escape training and activity changes in single paramecia. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86, 258–266.
17.
JensenD. D. (1957a) Experiments on “learning” in paramecia. Science, 125, 191–192.
18.
JensenD. D. (1957b) More on “learning” in paramecium. Science, 126, 1341–1342.
19.
KatzM. S.DeterlineW. A. (1958) Apparent learning in the Paramecium. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 51, 243–247.
20.
MirskyA. F.KatzM. F. (1958) Avoidance “conditioning” in paramecia. Science, 127, 1498–1499.
21.
SoestH. (1937) Dressurversuche mit Ciliaten und Rhabdocoelen Turbellarien. [Training experiments with ciliates and rhabdoceoele turbellarians]. Zeitscrift für vergleichende Physiologie, 24, 720–748.
22.
ThorpeW. H. (1963) Learning and instinct in animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press.
