This study examined relationships between academic cheating behaviors by using self-reports of past cheating behavior, providing a situational experiment with the opportunity to cheat, and evaluating defense mechanisms and object relations as measured by the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. Subjects included 75 female and 8 male university students ranging in age from 18 to 51 years (M = 25.5, SD = 6.9). Analysis showed variations in students' self-reported cheating history relative to their measured object relations status and type of defense mechanisms. Actual cheating in the experimental setting was not significantly related to any of these variables. Findings are discussed based on a critique of heterogeneity of the cheating construct.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndermanE. M.GriesingerT.WesterfieldG. (1997) Motivation and cheating during adolescence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, March 24-28, 1997.
2.
AndersonT.LeitnerL. M. (1991) The relationship between the Defense Mechanisms Inventory and reported symptomatology in college females. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 967–969.
3.
AntionD. L.MichaelW. B. (1983) Short-term predictive validity of demographic, affective, personal, and cognitive variables in relation to two criterion measures of cheating behaviors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 467–482.
4.
BairdJ. S.Jr. (1980) Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 515–522.
5.
CohenJ. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
CouncilJ. R. (1993) Context effects in personality research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(2), 31–34.
7.
CramerP. (1988) The Defense Mechanisms Inventory: a review of research and discussions of the scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 142–164.
8.
DavisS. F. (1993) Cheating in college is for a career: academic dishonesty in the 1990s. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association (39th), Atlanta, GA, March 24-27, 1993.
9.
DavisS. F.LudvigsonH. W. (1995) Additional data on academic dishonety and a proposal for remediation. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 119–121.
10.
DePalmaM. T.MadeyS. F.BornscheinS. (1995) Individual differences and cheating behavior: guilt and cheating in competitive situations. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 761–769.
11.
FreudS. (1923) The Ego and the Id. New York: Norton.
12.
GleserG. D.IhilevichD. (1969) An objective instrument for measuring defense mechanisms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 51–60.
13.
GrimmD. W.BrannonR.JuniS. (1997) Defense mechanisms and object relations as factors in marital satisfaction. Contemporary Family Therapy, 19, 305–312.
14.
HainesV. J.DiekhoffG. M.LaBeffE. E.ClarkR. E. (1986) College cheating: immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25, 342–354.
15.
IhilevichD.GleserG. C. (1993a) Defense mechanisms: their classification, correlates and measurement with the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
16.
IhilevichD.GleserG. C. (1993b) Defenses in psychotherapy: the clinical application of the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
17.
IhilevichD.GleserG. C. (1995) The Defense Mechanisms Inventory: its development and clinical applications. In ConteH. R.PlutchikR. (Eds.), Ego defenses: theory and measurement. New York: Wiley-Interscience. Pp. 221–246.
18.
JuniS. (1979) Theoretical foundations of projection as a defense mechanism. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 6, 115–130.
19.
JuniS. (1981) Theoretical foundations of reaction formation as a defense mechanism. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 104, 107–133.
20.
JuniS. (1982a) The composite measure of the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 193–200.
21.
JuniS. (1982b) Use of defense orientation construct as a predictor of acceptance of feedback. Psychological Reports, 50, 1215–1218.
22.
JuniS. (1992) Familial dyadic patterns in defenses and object relations. Contemporary Family Therapy, 14, 259–268.
23.
JuniS. (1997) Conceptualizing defense mechanisms from drive theory and object relations perspectives. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 57, 149–166.
24.
JuniS. (1999) The Defense Mechanisms Inventory: theoretical and psychometric implications. Current Psychology, 17, 313–333.
25.
JuniS.CohenP. (1985) Partial impulse erogeneity as a function of fixation and object relations. Journal of Sex Research, 21, 275–291.
26.
JuniS.GrimmD. W. (1994) Sex roles as factors in defense mechanisms and object relations. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 155, 99–106.
27.
JuniS.KatzB. (2001) Self-effacing wit as a response to oppression: dynamics in ethnic humor. Journal of General Psychology, 128, 119–142.
28.
JuniS.KatzB.HamburgerM. (1996) Identification with the aggressor vs. turning against the self: an empirical study of turn-of-the-century European Jewish humor. Current Psychology, 14, 313–327.
29.
JuniS.MaslingJ. (1980) Reaction to aggression and the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 44, 484–486.
30.
JuniS.OttomanelliG.FineJ. (1992) Safe sex behavior in drug addicted males as a function of object relations. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9, 237–241.
31.
JuniS.YanishevskyD. (1983) Defensive style: state or trait?Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 536–538.
32.
KellyJ. A.WorellL. (1978) Personality characteristics, parent behaviors, and sex of subject in relation to cheating. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 179–188.
33.
McCabeD. L.TrevtnoL. K. (1993) Academic dishonesty: honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 522–538.
34.
MurdockT. B.MillerA.KohlhardtJ. (2004) Effects of classroom context variables on high school students' judgments of the acceptability and likelihood of cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 765–777.
35.
NewsteadS. E.Franklyn-StokesA.ArmsteadP. (1996) Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 229–241.
36.
OttomanelliG.BihariB.JuniS. (1989) DMI-measured and HIV-related risk behaviors in IV compared to non-IV substance abusers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 6, 251–256.
37.
RoigM.NeamanM. A. W. (1994) Alienation, learning or grade orientation, and achievement as correlates of attitudes toward cheating. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 1096–1098.
38.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (1991) Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw Hill.
39.
RothN. L.McCabeD. L. (1995) Communication strategies for addressing academic dishonesty. Journal of College Student Development, 36, 531–541.
40.
SchabF. (1980) Cheating in high school: differences between the sexes (revisited). Adolescence, 15, 959–965.
41.
SchneiderA. (1999) Why professors don't do more to stop students who cheat. Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(20), A8–A10.
42.
SinghalA. C. (1982) Factors in students' dishonesty. Psychological Reports, 51, 775–780.
43.
SpillerS.CrownD. F. (1995) Changes over time in academic dishonesty at the collegiate level. Psychological Reports, 76, 763–768.
44.
TangS.ZuoJ. (1997) Profiles of college examination cheaters. College Student Journal, 31, 340–346.
45.
ThorpeM. F.PittengerD. J.ReedB. D. (1999) Cheating the researcher: a study of the relation between personality measures and self-reported cheating. College Student Journal, 33, 49–59.
46.
WeissmanH. N.RitterK.GordonR. M. (1971) Reliability study of the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. Psychological Reports, 29, 1237–1238.
47.
WilsonJ. F. (1982) Recovery from surgery and scores on the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 312–319.
