Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In the present study, 72 college-age participants from an introductory psychology course viewed a series of 20 pictures depicting events surrounding a routine activity, i.e., eating at a cafeteria; these pictures were presented either in a logical order, e.g., enter cafeteria, pick up tray, stand in line, and select food, or in a random order. Three successive tests of free reconstruction of order indicated disparate effects of these conditions; random presentation produced significant forgetting of order information across tests, whereas logical presentation produced no change in performance across tests. Whereas randomly presented stimuli produced both reliable intertest recovery (reminiscence) and forgetting, neither result was observed following logical presentation. The implications of these data for eyewitness testimony for general theories of hypermnesia are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bower

G. H.

Clark-Meyers

(1980) Memory for scripts with organized vs randomized presentations. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 369–377.

Ebbinghaus

(1885/1964) Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. ( Ruger

H. A.

Bussenius

C. E.

, Transl.) New York: Dover.

Erdelyi

M. H.

Becker

(1974) Hypermnesia for pictures: incremental memory for pictures but not for words in multiple recall trials. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 159–171.

Kelley

M. R.

Nairne

J. S.

(2003) Remembering the forgotten? Reminiscence, hypermnesia, and memory for order. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 577–599.

McDaniel

M. A.

Moore

B. A.

Whiteman

H. L.

(1998) Dynamic changes in hypermnesia across early and late tests: a relational/item-specific account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 173–185.

Otani

Hodge

M. H.

(1991) Does hypermnesia occur in recognition and cued recall? American Journal of Psychology, 104, 101–116.

Otani

Stimson

M. J.

(1994) A further attempt to demonstrate hypermnesia in recognition. The Psychological Record, 44, 25–34.

Otani

Whiteman

H. L.

(1994) Cued recall hypermnesia is not an artifact of response bias. American Journal of Psychology, 107, 401–421.

Payne

D. G.

(1987) Hypermnesia and reminiscence in recall: a historical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 5–27.

10.

Payne

D. G.

Hembrooke

H. A.

Anastasi

J. S.

(1993) Hypermnesia in free and cued recall. Memory & Cognition, 21, 48–62.

11.

Payne

D. G.

Roediger

H. L.

III . (1987) Hypermnesia occurs in recall but not in recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 100, 145–165.

12.

Roediger

H. L.

III . (1982) Hypermnesia: the importance of recall time and asymptotic recall level. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 662–665.

13.

Roediger

H. L.

III Challis

B. H.

(1989) Hypermnesia: improvements in recall with repeated testing. In Izawa

(Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes: the Tulane Floweree Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 175–199.

14.

Roediger

H. L.

III Payne

D. G.

Gillespie

G. L.

Lean

D. S.

(1982) Hypermnesia as determined by level of recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 635–655.

15.

Rubin

D. C.

Wenzel

A. C.

(1996) One hundred years of forgetting: a quantitative description of retention. Psychological Review, 103, 734–760.

16.

Schank

R. C.

Abelson

R. P.

(1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Oxford, Eng.: Erlbaum.

Repeated Questioning for Order of Events: Disparate Effects following Logical versus Random Presentation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References