Discriminant analyses of data on 6 dimensions from Whissell's analyses of 27 books of an English translation of the New Testament seem to support Clement of Alexandria's contention that Luke was involved in the authorship, but it is difficult after centuries to rule out definitively a few other contenders.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MorrisL. (1981) Hebrews. In GaebeleinF. E.DouglasJ. D. (Eds.), The expositor's Bible commentary. Vol. 12. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. Pp. 3–158.
2.
RossR. W. (1962) Hebrews. In PfeifferC. F.HarrisonE. F. (Eds.), The Wycliffe Bible commentary. Chicago, IL: Moody Press. Pp. 1401–1427.
3.
WhissellC. (2004) Using computer-scored measures of emotion and style to discriminate among disputed and undisputed Pauline and non-Pauline epistles. Psychological Reports, 98, 1117–1125.
4.
WhissellC. (2006) A comparison of the books of the New Testament (English translation) in terms of emotion and word use. Psychological Reports, 98, 57–64.