Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The goal of the study was to establish whether false allegations of sexual offences with an unknown perpetrator can be distinguished from accurate allegations. Case files of 27 true allegations of sexual offences with an unknown perpetrator were compared to those of 14 false allegations. The comparison was guided by a list of 43 criteria that are hypothesized to differentiate between true and false allegations of sexual assault. Analyses indicated the employed criteria differentiated true from false allegations to a certain extent. However, the discriminative strength of some criteria appeared to be stronger than that of others. Research is required to assess further the discriminative power of these criteria.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Burgess

A. W.

Hazelwood

R. R.

(2001) False rape allegations. In Hazelwood

R. R.

Burgess

A. W.

(Eds.), Practical aspects of rape investigation: A multidisciplinary approach. London: CRC Press. Pp. 177–197.

Gudjonsson

G. H.

(2003) The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. London, UK: Wiley.

Johnson

M. K.

Foley

M. A.

Suengas

A. G.

Raye

C. L.

(1988) Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371–376.

Johnson

M. K.

Hashtroudi

Lindsay

D. S.

(1993) Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.

Kanin

E. J.

(1994) False rape allegations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 81–92.

Mann

Vrij

Bull

(2004) Detecting true lies: Police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 137–149.

Ruby

C. L.

Brigham

J. C.

(1997) The usefulness of the criteria-based content analysis technique in distinguishing truthful and fabricated allegations: A critical review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 705–737.

Sporer

S. L.

(1997) The less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373–397.

Steller

Köhnken

(1989) Criteria-based statement analysis. In Raskin

D. C.

(Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigations and evidence. New York: Springer. Pp. 217–245.

10.

Stelma

(2003) Kenmerken van valse aangiften in zedenzaken [Characteristics of false allegations of sexual offences]. Paper presented at the False allegations conference. Zeist, The Netherlands: Kinterview, February 6, 2003.

11.

Suengas

A. G.

Johnson

M. K.

(1988) Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 377–389.

12.

Undeutsch

(1967) Beurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Aussagen. In Undeutsch

(Ed.), Handbuch der Psychologie: 11. Forensische Psychologie Göttingen: Hogrefe. Pp. 26–181.

13.

Vrij

(2000) Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and implications for professional practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

14.

Wagenaar

W. A.

Van Koppen

P. J.

Crombag

H. F. M.

(1993) Anchored narratives: The psychology of criminal evidence. London, UK: Harvester Press.

Characteristics of True versus False Allegations of Sexual Offences

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References