123 students and 123 nonstudent supervisors viewed videotapes which displayed four supposed subordinate supervisors, two African Americans and two Caucasians, who individually described their respective performances during the past year. After being told either that the supposed subordinates would or that they would not have access to the performance rating, the subjects rated the performance of those subordinate supervisors. While anonymity of rater and race of rater had no evaluative effect on the performance ratings given by the nonstudent subjects, the student subjects gave higher ratings when they believed that their ratings would be made public. Also, the nonstudent subjects' ratings differed as a function of whether they worked closely with others of another race and as a function of the frequency with which they actually discussed performance evaluations with their own subordinates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramiP. C.LeventhalL.PerryR. P.BreenL. J. (1976) Course evaluation: How?Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 300–304.
2.
AntonioniD. (1994) The effects of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings. Personnel Psychology, 47, 349–356.
3.
BassettG. A.MeyerH. H. (1968) Performance appraisal based on self-review. Personnel Psychology, 21, 421–430.
4.
BernardinH. J. (1978) Effects of rater training on leniency and halo errors in student ratings of instructors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 301–308.
5.
BigonessW. J. (1976) Effects of applicant's sex, race, and performance on employers' performance ratings: Some additional findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 80–84.
6.
BretzR. D.Jr.MilkovichG. T.ReadW. (1992) The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of Management, 18, 321–352.
7.
CozanL. W. (1959) Forced-choice: Better than other rating methods. Personnel, 39, 80–83.
8.
DeJungJ. E.KaplanH. (1962) Some differential effects of race and combat attitude. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46, 370–374.
9.
DewberryC. (2001) Performance disparities between whites and ethnic minorities: Real differences or assessment bias?Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 659–673.
10.
EllisL. (1984) The effects of anonymity on student ratings of college teaching and course quality. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 11, 182–186.
11.
ElviraM. M.ZatzickC. D. (2002) Who's displaced first? The role of race in layoff decisions. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 41, 329–361.
12.
FisherC. D. (1998) Current and recurrent challenges in HRM. Journal of Management, 15, 157–180.
13.
FletcherC. (2001) Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 473–487.
14.
FoxH.LefkowitzJ. (1974) Differential validity: Ethnic group as a moderator in predicting job performance. Personnel Psychology, 27, 209–223.
15.
GordonM. E.SladeL. A.SchmittN. (1986) The “science of the sophomore” revisited: From conjecture to empiricism. Academy of Management Review, 11, 191–207.
16.
GreenhausJ. H.ParasuramanS. (1993) Job performance attributions and career advancement prospects: An examination of gender and race effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 273–297.
17.
GreenhausJ. H.ParasuramanS.WormleyW. M. (1990) Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 64–86.
18.
HamnerW. C.KimJ. S.BairdL.BigonessW. J. (1974) Race and sex as determinants of ratings by potential employers in a simulated work-sampling task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 705–711.
19.
JawaharI. M.WilliamsC. R. (1997) Where all the children are above average: The performance appraisal purpose effect. Personnel Psychology, 50, 905–925.
20.
KraigerK.FordJ. K. (1985) A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 56–65.
21.
LandyF. J.FarrJ. L. (1980) Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72–107.
22.
LandyF. J.ShanksterL. J.KohlerS. S. (1994) Personnel selection and placement. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 261–296.
23.
LewisG. B. (1997) Race, sex and performance ratings in the federal service. Public Administration Review, 57, 479–489.
24.
ManiB. (2002) Performance appraisal systems, productivity, and motivation: A case study. Public Personnel Management, 31, 141–159.
MeyerH. H.WalkerW. B. (1961) A study of factors relating to the effectiveness of a performance appraisal program. Personnel Psychology, 14, 291–298.
27.
MobleyW. H. (1982) Supervisor and employee race and sex effects on performance appraisals: A field study of adverse impact and generalizability. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 598–606.
28.
PulakosE. D.WhiteL. A.OpplerS. H.BormanW. C. (1989) An examination of race and sex effects on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 770–780.
29.
RonningR. R.WalshU. R. (1977) Effects of student anonymity-nonanonymity on the factor structure of a teacher rating form. Research in Higher Education, 6, 363–371.
30.
SackettP. R.DuBoisC. L. Z.NoeA. W. (1991) Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and white-black differences in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 262–267.
31.
SchmidtF. L.JohnsonR. H. (1973) Effect of race on peer ratings in an industrial setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 237–241.
32.
ShoreL. M.ShoreT. H. (1989) Effects of subordinate sender, anonymity and the rating format on self- and supervisory ratings. Paper presented at the 1989 meeting of the Southern Management Association, New Orleans, LA.
33.
SmithD. E. (1986) Training programs for performance appraisal: A review. Academy of Management Review, 11, 22–40.
34.
SmitherJ. W.BarryS. R.ReillyR. R. (1989) An investigation of the validity of expert true score estimates in appraisal research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 143–151.
35.
The Society for Human Resource Management. (1990) Who's who in HR. Alexandria, VA: The Society.
36.
StoneE. F.SpoolM. D.RabinowitzS. (1977) Effects of anonymity and retaliatory potential on student evaluations of faculty performance. Research in Higher Education, 6, 315–325.
37.
ThompsonD. E.ThompsonT. A. (1985) Task-based performance appraisal for blue-collar jobs: Evaluation of race and sex effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 747–753.
38.
TsuiA.EganT.O'ReillyC. (1992) Being different: Rational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579.
39.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1977) Dictionary of occupational titles. Lanham, MD: Berman Press.
40.
WaldmanD. A.AvolioB. J. (1991) Race effects in performance evaluations: Controlling for ability, education, and experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 897–901.
41.
WhitenerE. M.MartocchioJ. J. (1989) Fairness in personnel selection: A meta-analysis of white and minority differences in performance. Paper presented at the 1989 meeting of the Southern Management Association, New Orleans, LA.
42.
ZedeckS.CascioW. F. (1982) Performance appraisal decisions as a function of rater training and purpose of the appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 752–758.
