This study focused on relationships between Machiavellianism in subordinates and perceived social power bases of supervisors in a sample of 168 bank officers in the western United States. Regression analyses showed no significant relationships between subordinates' Machiavellianism scores and four supervisory power bases subscales. The association between scores on Machiavellianism and coercive power reached p < .06.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngS. H.LeongS. M. (2000) Out of the mouths of babes: Business ethics and youths in Asia. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 129–144.
2.
ChristieR.GeisF. I. (1970) Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
3.
CorzineJ. B.BuntzmanG. F.BuschE. T. (1999) Machiavellianism in U.S. bankers. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 7, 72–83.
4.
FrenchJ. R. P.RavenB. (1968) The bases of social power. In CartwrightD.ZanderA. (Eds.), Group dynamics. New York: Harper & Row. Pp. 259–269.
5.
GableM.HollonC.DangelloF. (1990) Relating locus of control to Machiavellianism and managerial achievement. Psychological Reports, 67, 339–343.
6.
GableM.TopolM. T. (1989) Machiavellianism and job satisfaction of retailing executives in a specialty store chain. Psychological Reports, 64, 107–112.
7.
GaskiJ. F. (1986) Interrelations among a channel entity's power sources: Impact of the exercise of reward and coercion on expert, referent, and legitimate power sources. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 62–67.
8.
HairJ. E.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (1995) Multivariate data analysis. (4th ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Simon & Schuster.
9.
HessC. W.WagnerB. T. (1999) Factor structure of the Rahim Leader Power Inventory (RLPI) with clinical female student supervisees. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 1004–1015.
10.
HollonC. J. (1996) Machiavellianism and perceived managerial job environment dimensions. Psychological Reports, 79, 65–66.
11.
KerlingerF. N.PedhazurE. J. (1973) Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
12.
LogsdonJ. M.CorzineJ. B. (1999) The CEO's psychological characteristics and ethical culture. In RahimM. A.GolembiewskiR. T.MacKenzieK. D. (Eds.), Current topics in management. Vol. 4. Stamford, CT: JAI Press. Pp. 63–79.
13.
McHoskeyJ. W. (1999) Machiavellianism, intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, and social interest: A self-determination theory analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 267–283.
14.
MudrackP. E.MasonE. S.StepanskiK. M. (1999) Equity sensitivity and business ethics. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 12, 539–560.
15.
NelsonG.GilbertsonD. (1991) Machiavellianism revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 633–639.
16.
RahimM. A. (1988) The development of a leader power inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 491–502.
17.
RahimM. A. (1989) Relationships of leader power to compliance and satisfaction with supervision: Evidence from a national sample of managers. Journal of Management, 15, 545–556.
18.
RahimM. A.AntonioniD.KrumovK.IuevaS. (2000) Power, conflict, and effectiveness: A cross-cultural study in the United States and Bulgaria. European Psychologist, 5, 28–33.
19.
RahimM. A.AntonioniD.PsenickaC. (2001) A structural equations model of leader power, subordinates' styles of handling conflict, and job performance. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 191–211.
20.
RahimM. A.BuntzmanG. F. (1989) Supervisory power bases, styles of handling conflict with subordinates, and subordinate compliance and satisfaction. Journal of Psychology, 123, 195–210.
21.
RahimM. A.KhanA. A.UddinS. J. (1994) Leader power and subordinates organizational commitment and effectiveness: Test of a theory in a developing nation. International Executive, 36, 327–331.
22.
RahimM. A.KimN. H.KimJ. S. (1994) Bases of leader power, subordinate compliance, and satisfaction with supervision: A cross-cultural study of managers in the U.S. and S. Korea. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 2, 136–154.
23.
RahimM. A.MagnerN. R. (1996) Confirmatory factor analysis of the bases of leader power: First-order factor model and its invariance across groups. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 495–516.
24.
RahimM. A.PsenickaC. (1994) Convergent and discriminant validity of the Rahim Leader Power Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 488–490.
25.
SiuW. (1998) Machiavellianism and retail banking executives in Hong Kong. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 13, 28–34.
26.
SiuW.TamK. (1995) Machiavellianism and Chinese banking executives in Hong Kong. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 13, 15–21.
27.
VecchioR. P. (2000) Negative emotion in the workplace: Employee jealousy and envy. International Journal of Stress Management, 7, 161–179.
28.
VleemingR. G. (1979) Machiavellianism: A preliminary review. Psychological Reports, 44, 295–310.
