Dimensionality and Construct Validity of a Video-Based,Objective Personality Test for the Assessment of Willingness to Take Risks in Road Traffic

Abstract

The study at hand reports first results about the dimensionality and construct validity of a newly developed objective, video-based personality test, which assesses the willingness to take risks in traffic situations. On the basis of the theory of risk homeostasis developed by Wilde, different traffic situations with varying amounts of objective danger were filmed. These situations mainly consisted of situations with passing maneuvers and speed choice or traffic situations at intersections. Each of these traffic situations describes an action which should be carried out. The videos of the traffic situations are presented twice. Before the first presentation, a short written explanation of the preceding traffic situation and a situation-contingent reaction is provided. The respondents are allowed to obtain an overview of the given situations during the first presentation of each traffic situation. During the second presentation the respondents are asked to indicate at which point the action that is contingent on the described situation will become too dangerous to carry out. Latencies for items were recorded as a measure for the magnitude of the person's subjectively accepted willingness to take risks in the sense of the risk homeostasis theory by Wilde. In a study with 243 people with different education and sex, the one-dimensionality of the test corresponding to the latency model by Scheiblechner was investigated. Analysis indicated that the new measure assesses a one-dimensional latent personality trait which can be interpreted as subjectively accepted amount of risk (target risk value). First indicators for the construct validity of the test are given by a significant correlation with the construct-related secondary scale, adventurousness of the Eysenck Personality Profiler with, at the same time, nonsignificant correlations to the two secondary scales, extroversion and emotional stability, that are not linked to the construct.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersen

E. B.

(1973) A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrica, 8, 123–140.

Burns

C. P.

Wilde

G. J. S.

(1995) Risk taking in male taxi drivers: Relationships among personality, observational data and driver records. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 267–278.

Deffenbacher

J. L.

Oetting

E. R.

Lynch

R. S.

(1994) Development of a driving anger scale. Psychological Reports, 74, 83–91.

Evans

(1991) Traffic safety and the driver. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Eysenck

H. J.

Wilson

C. D.

Jackson

C. J.

(1998) Manual for the Eysenck Personality Profiler. New York: Guilford, Psi-Press.

Fischer

G. H.

(1995) The Linear Logistic Test Model. In Fischer

G. H.

Molenaar

I. W.

(Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments and applications. New York: Springer. Pp. 157–179.

Fischer

G. PL

Kisser

(1983) Notes on the Exponential Latency Model and an empirical application. In Wainer

Messick

(Eds.), Principles of modern psychological measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 139–157.

Hergovich

Schuster

(2003) Wiener Risikobereitschaftstest [Vienna Risk-taking Test]. Mödling: Schuhfried GmbH.

Horswill

M. S.

McKenna

F. P.

(1999) The development, validation, and application of a video-based technic for measuring an everyday risk-taking behavior: Drivers' speed choice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 977–985.

10.

Iversen

Rundmo

(2002) Personality, risky driving and accident involvement among Norwegian drivers. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1251–1263.

11.

Jansen

M. G. H.

(1997) Rasch's model for reading speed with manifest explanatory variables. Psychometrika, 62, 393–409.

12.

Jansen

M. G. H.

Glas

C. A. W.

(2000) Statistical tests for differential test functioning in Rasch's model for speed tests. In Boomsma

Van Duijn

M. A. I.

Snijder

T. A. B.

(Eds.), Essays on Item Response Theory. New York: Springer Verlag. Pp. 149–162.

13.

Kuratorium för Verkehrssicherheit. (2003) Unfallstatistik 2002. In Kuratorium für Verkehrssicherheit, Institut für Unfallstatistik (Eds.), Verkehr in Österreich [Traffic in Austria]. Wien: Bundespolizeitdirektion Wien. Pp. 202–205.

14.

Martin-Löf

(1973) Statistika Modeller. Anteckningar fran seminarier lasaret 1969–1970 utarbetade av Rolf Sundberg. Obetydligt ändrat nytryck, October 1973. (Photocopied manuscript) Stockholm: Institutet för säkringsmatematik och matematisk statistik vid Stockholms Universitet.

15.

Molenaar

I. W.

(1995) Estimation of Item Parameters. In Fischer

G. H.

Molenaar

I. W.

(Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments and applications. New York: Springer. Pp. 39–51.

16.

Montag

Comrey

A. L.

(1987) Internality and externality as correlates of involvement in fatal driving accidents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 339–343.

17.

Neisser

(1978) Memory: What are the important questions? In Gruneberg

M. M.

Morris

P. E.

Sykes

R. N.

(Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pp. 3–24.

18.

Ones

D. S.

Viswesvaran

Reiss

A. D.

(1996) Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660–679.

19.

Pflanzagl

(1994) On item parameter estimation in certain latent trait models. In Fischer

G. H.

Laming

(Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics, and methodology. New York: Springer Verlag. Pp. 249–263.

20.

Rasch

(1960/1980) Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago, IL: The Univer. of Chicago Press.

21.

Rost

(2004) Lehrbuch Testtheorie Testkonstruktion [Textbook test-theory test-construction]. Bern: Huber.

22.

Scheiblechner

(1978) Computer routines for conditional inference for the linear exponential method. Berichte aus dem Fachbereich Psychologie der Philipps-Universität Marburg/Lahn, 64.

23.

Scheiblechner

(1979) Specifically stochastic latency mechanisms. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19, 18–38.

24.

Scheiblechner

(1985) Psychometric models for speed-test construction: The linear exponential model. In Embretson

S. E.

(Ed.), Test design: Developments in psychology and psychometrics. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 219–244.

25.

Schuster

(2000) Entwicklung eines Tests zur Erfassung der Risikobereitschaft [Development of a test to assess the willingness to take risks]. (Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit) Wien: Universität Wien.

26.

Wilde

G. J. S.

(1978) Theorie der Risikokompensation der Unfallverurssachung und praktische Folgerungen für die Unfallverhütung [Theory of risk-compensation of accident causes and practical consequences for the prevention of accidents]. Hefte der Unfallkunde, 130, 134–156.

27.

Wilde

G. J. S.

(1994) Target risk: Dealing with the danger of death, disease and damage in everyday decisions. Toronto: PDE Publications.