Analysis of the responses of some 4,000 college students showed increasing differentiation in the ratings of gender characteristics of typical women and men, especially with regard to feminine traits. Roughly similar patterns were observed in five other studies using the same gender traits. All studies showed continued or increased sex typing on affectionate and sympathetic. In the present study women became more feminine, and males became less, on all but one of the feminine traits. This increasing differentiation of women and men is not consistent with predictions from the sociocultural model; they are more consistent with those of the evolutionary model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AusterC. J.OhmS. C. (2000) Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: A reevaluation using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 43, 499–528.
2.
BianchiS. M. (2000) Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity?Demography, 37, 401–414.
3.
De LisiR.SoundranayagamL. (1990) The conceptual structure of sex role stereotypes in college students. Sex Roles, 23, 593–611.
4.
EaglyA. H. (1994) On comparing women and men. Feminism and Psychology, 4, 513–522.
5.
EaglyA. H.DiekmanA. B. (2004) The commonsense psychology of changing social groups. In JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (Eds.), Perspectivism in social psychology: The yin and yang of scientific progress. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Pp. 201–213.
6.
HoffmanL. W. (1977) Changes in family roles, socialization, and sex differences. American Psychologist, 32, 644–657.
7.
HoltC. L.EllisJ. B. (1998) Assessing the current validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 39, 929–941.
8.
HosodaM.StoneD. L. (2000) Current gender stereotypes and their evaluative content. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 1283–1294.
9.
LueptowL. B. (1984) Adolescent sex roles and social change. New York: Columbia Univer. Press.
10.
LueptowL. B.Garovich-SzaboL.LueptowM. B. (2001) Social change and the persistence of sex typing: 1974–1997. Social Forces, 80, 1–35.
11.
McCauleyC. R. (1995) Are stereotypes exaggerated? A sampling of racial, gender, academic, occupational, and political stereotypes. In LeeY-T.JussimL. J.McCauleyC. R. (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Pp. 215–243.
12.
NesbittM. N.PennN. E. (2000) Gender stereotypes after thirty years: A replication of Rosenkrantz, et al. (1968). Psychological Reports, 87, 493–511.
13.
RossiA. S. (1984) Gender and parenthood. American Sociological Review, 49, 1–19.
14.
TwengeJ. M. (1997a) Attitudes toward women, 1970–1995: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 35–51.
15.
TwengeJ. M. (1997b) Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325.
16.
UdryJ. R. (2000) Biological limits of gender construction. American Sociological Review, 65, 443–457.
17.
WoodW.EaglyA. H. (2002) A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.
