The present study investigated the receptiveness of speakers toward conversational partners in dialogues by comparing duration of response latencies in both Compromise and Debate conditions. 12 dyads of speakers holding opposing opinions participated in a 15-min. dialogue. Six dyads in the Compromise condition reached a conclusion through discussion and consideration of the partner's opinion. The six dyads in the Debate condition imposed their opinion on the conversational partner. Analysis indicated that in compromise dialogues, the response latencies of the conversational partners become similar over the time course, while in debate dialogues, the response latency does not become similar, suggesting that speakers having a receptive attitude adjust their response latencies to match the partner's. The role of congruence of response latencies in dyadic communication was discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmanS.ValenziE.HodgettsR. (1985) Organizational behavior: Theory and practice. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
2.
BeattieG. W. (1978) Floor apportionment and gaze in conversational dyads. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 7–15.
3.
BernierJ. E.RustadK. (1977) Psychology of counseling curriculum: A follow-up study. The Counseling Psychologist, 6(4), 18–22.
4.
BernieriF. J.GillisJ. S.DavisJ. M.GraheJ. G. (1996) Dyad rapport and accuracy of its judgment across situations: A lens model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 110–129.
5.
CappellaJ. N.PlanalpS. (1981) Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations: III. Interspeaker influence. Human Communication Research, 7, 117–132.
6.
CharnyM. D. (1966) Psychosomatic manifestations of rapport in psychotherapy. Psychosomatic Medicine, 28, 305–315.
7.
DuncanS.Jr. (1972) Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 283–292.
FeldsteinS.WelkowitzJ. (1978) Conversational congruence: Correlates and concerns. In SiegmanA.FeldsteinS. (Eds.), Nonverbal behavior and communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 358–378.
10.
GarveyC.BenDebbaM. (1974) Effect of age, sex, and partner on children's dyadic speech. Child Development, 45, 1159–1161.
11.
GilesH.SmithP. (1979) Accommodation theory: Optimal levels of convergence. In GilesH.St. ClairR. N. (Eds.), Language and social psychology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Pp. 45–65.
12.
JaffeJ.FeldsteinS. (1970) Rhythms of dialogue. New York: Academic Press.
KendonA. (1967) Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologia, 26, 22–63.
15.
LaFranceM. (1982) Posture mirroring and rapport. In DavisM. (Ed.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior. New York: Human Sciences. Pp. 279–298.
16.
MatarazzoJ. D.WiensA. N. (1967) Interviewer influence on durations of interviewee silence. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 2, 56–69.
17.
NagaokaC.KomoriM.NakamuraT. (2002) [The interspeaker influence of switching pauses in dialogues]. [The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics], 38, 316–323. [in Japanese]
18.
NataleM. (1975a) Convergence of mean vocal intensity in dyadic communication as a function of social desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 790–804.
19.
NataleM. (1975b) Social desirability as related to convergence of temporal speech patterns. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 827–830.
20.
ScheflenA. E. (1964) The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry, 27, 316–331.
21.
StaplesF. R.SloaneR. B. (1976) Truax factors, speech characteristics, and therapeutic outcome. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 163, 135–140.
22.
StreetR. L.Jr. (1984) Speech convergence and speech evaluation in fact-finding interviews. Human Communication Research, 11, 139–169.
23.
WartersJ. (1954) Techniques of counseling. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
WelkowitzJ.BondR. N.FeldsteinL.TotaM. E. (1990) Conversational time patterns and mutual influence in parent-child interactions: A time series approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19, 221–243.
25.
WelkowitzJ.CariffeG.FeldsteinS. (1976) Conversational congruence as a criterion of socialization in children. Child Development, 47, 269–272.
26.
WelkowitzJ.FeldsteinS.FinklesteinM.AylesworthL. (1972) Changes in vocal intensity as a function of interspeaker influence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 35, 715–718.
27.
WelkowitzJ.KucM. (1973) Interrelationships among warmth, genuineness, empathy, and temporal speech patterns in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 472–473.
28.
ZimmerJ. M.ParkP. (1967) Factor analysis of counselor communications. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 14, 198–203.
