Revisiting the Factor Structure of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory

Abstract

The original Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory, used to measure innovative (as opposed to adaptive) individual cognitive styles, has been reported to have three factors: Sufficiency of Originality, Efficiency, and Rule/Group Conformity. In exploring the construct validity of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory, findings from a 2003 study by Im, Hu, and Toh showed the existence of two subdimensions of the Sufficiency of Originality factor—Idea Generation and Preference for Change. In this study, using a sample of 356 household participants, with an average age of 56.0 yr. (SD = 14.0), average income of $39,700 (SD = $19,200), and average of 15.0 yr. of education (SD = 2), from the Arkansas Household Research Panel, we conducted factor analyses. The results specific to our selected sample indicate that a four-factor model recognizing the two subdimensions of Sufficiency of Originality has a better fit than the original three-factor model.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bagozzi

R. P.

Foxall

G. R.

(1995) Construct validity and generalizability of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. European Journal of Personality, 9, 227.1–227.23.

Bagozzi

R. P.

Foxall

G. R.

(1996) Construct validation of a measure of adaptive-innovative cognitive styles in consumption. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 201–213.

Beene

J. M.

Zelhart

P. F.

(1988) Factor analysis of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 667–671.

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Pp. 136–162.

Foxall

G. R.

Hackett

P. M. W.

(1992) The factor structure and construct validity of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 967–975.

Goldsmith

R. E.

(1984) Personality characteristics associated with adaption-innovation. Journal of Psychology, 117, 159–165.

Hammond

S. M.

(1986) Some pitfalls in the use of factor scores: The case of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 401–407.

M. Y.

Toh

R. S.

(2003) Exploring the dimensionality of the originality subscale of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Psychological Reports, 93, 883–894.

Kirton

M. J.

(1976) Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629.

10.

Kirton

M. J.

(1978) Have adaptors and innovators equal levels of creativity? Psychological Reports, 42, 695–698.

11.

Mulligan

Martin

(1980) Adaptors, innovators and the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Psychological Reports, 46, 883–892.

12.

Taylor

W. G. K.

(1989a) The Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory: A re-examination of the factor structure. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 297–307.

13.

Taylor

W. G. K.

(1989b) The Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory: Should the sub-scales be orthogonal? Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 921–929.