The hypothesis that the sex composition of an applicant pool affects the hiring probabilities of individual job applicants was tested using gender-distinctive information on accepted and rejected job applicants in The Netherlands. The evidence supports this hypothesis, although the effect sizes are moderate. Both men and women have a lower probability of being hired when the applicant pool contains fewer applicants from their own sex.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArcuriL. (1982) Three patterns of social categorization in attribution memory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 271–282.
2.
CejkaM. A.EaglyA. H. (1999) Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413–423.
3.
CohenL. E.BroschakJ. P.HavemanH. A. (1998) And then there were more? The effect of organizational sex composition on the hiring and promotion of managers. American Sociological Review, 63, 711–727.
4.
DavisonH. K.BurkeM. J. (2000) Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 225–248.
5.
GattonD. S.DuBoisC. L. Z.FaleyR. H. (1999) The effects of organizational context on occupational gender-stereotyping. Sex Roles, 40, 567–582.
6.
GlickP. (1991) Trait-based and sex-based discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring. Sex Roles, 25, 351–378.
7.
GlickP.ZionC.NelsonC. (1988) What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 178–186.
8.
HarvieK.Marshall-McCaskeyJ.JohnstonL. (1998) Gender-based biases in occupational hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1698–1711.
9.
HeilmanM. (1980) The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool. Organisational Behavior and Human Performance, 26, 386–395.
10.
HeilmanM.BlockC.StathatosP. (1997) The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: Effects of performance information ambiguity. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 603–625.
11.
KlauerK. C.WegenerLEhrenbergK. (2002) Perceiving minority members as individuals: The effects of relative group size in social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 223–245.
12.
MarloweC. M.SchneiderS. L.NelsonC. E. (1996) Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased?Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 11–21.
13.
MizonG. E.RichardJ. F. (1986) The encompassing principle and its application to testing non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 54, 657–658.
14.
MullenB. (1991) Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations: The phenomenology of being in a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 297–323.
15.
OlianJ. D.SchwabD. P.HaberfeldY. (1988) The impact of applicant gender compared to qualifications on hiring recommendations: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 180–195.
16.
PerryE. L.Davis-BlakeA.KulikC. T. (1994) Explaining gender-based selection decisions: A synthesis of contextual and cognitive approaches. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 786–820.
17.
PrattoEStallworthL. M.SidaniusJ.SiersB. (1997) The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 37–53.
18.
ReskinB. (1993) Sex segregation in the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 241–270.
19.
RussoG.Van OmmerenJ. (1998) Gender differences in recruitment outcomes. Bulletin of Economic Research, 50, 155–166.
20.
SwimJ. K. (1994) Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21–36.
21.
TaylorS. E.FiskeS. T.EtcoffN. L.RudermanA. J. (1978) Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778–793.
22.
TosiH. L.EinbenderS. W. (1985) The effects of the type and amount of information in sex discrimination research: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 712–723.
23.
Van KnippenbergA.Van TwuyverM.PepelsJ. (1994) Factors affecting social categorization processes in memory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 419–431.
24.
Van TwuyverM.Van KnippenbergA. (1999) Social categorization as a function of relative group size. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 135–156.
