There has been considerable debate in the literature on the structure of affect, especially on the correlation between positive and negative affect and the effect of measurement error on this correlation. In this brief article, it is shown that, as Spearman (1904, 1907) noted, the extent to which the correlation between imperfect measures is attenuated by measurement error depends upon the reliabilities of the measures used.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenM. J.YenW. M. (1979) Introduction to measurement theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
BrownW. (1910) Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 296–322.
3.
CortinaJ. M. (1993) What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.
4.
CronbachL. J. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
5.
FanX. (2003) Two approaches for correcting correlation attenuation caused by measurement error: Implications for research practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 915–930.
6.
BarrettL. FeldmanRussellJ. A. (1999) The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 10–14.
7.
GreenD. P.GoldmanS. L.SaloveyP. (1993) Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1029–1041.
8.
GreenlandS.SchlesselmanJ. J.CriquiM. H. (1986) The fallacy of employing standardized regression coefficients and correlations as measures of effect. American Journal of Epidemiology, 123, 203–208.
9.
GuttmanL. (1945) A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10, 255–282.
10.
JöreskogK. G. (1971) Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109–133.
11.
LordF. M.NovickM. R. (1968) Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12.
RussellJ. A.CarrollJ. M. (1999) On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3–30.
13.
SchimmackU.BöckenholtU.ReisenzeinR. (2002) Response styles in affect ratings: Making a mountain out of a molehill. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 461–483.
14.
SpearmanC. (1904) The proof and measurement of associations between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101.
15.
SpearmanC. (1907) Demonstration of formulae for true measurement of correlation. American Journal of Psychology, 16, 161–169.
16.
WatsonD. (1988) The vicissitudes of mood measurement: Effects of varying descriptors, time frames, and responses formats on measures of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 128–141.
17.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1997) Measurement and mismeasurement of mood: Recurrent and emergent issues. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 267–296.
18.
WatsonD.TellegenA. (1999) Issues in the dimensional structure of affect: Effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response formats: Comment on Russell and Carroll (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 601–610.
