155 university faculty teaching students in physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech and language pathology, early childhood special education, or multidisciplinary studies programs were surveyed to assess how the students were taught how to use everyday family and community activities as natural learning opportunities for young children. Analysis showed that the faculty provided very little training in using community activity settings as contexts for children's learning and that physical therapy faculty provided less training in using natural environments as sources of children's learning opportunities than faculty in the other disciplines.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BruderM. B.DunstC. J. (in press) Personnel preparation in recommended early intervention practices: Degree of emphasis across disciplines. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education.
2.
DunstC. J.BruderM. B. (1999) Family and community activity settings, natural learning environments, and children's learning opportunities. Children's Learning Opportunities Report, 1(2), 1–2.
3.
FosnotC. T. (1996) Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In FosnotC. T. (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press. Pp. 8–33.
4.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act[IDEA]. Amendments, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq. (1997)
5.
RaabM.DunstC. J. (2004) Early intervention practitioner approaches to natural environment interventions. Journal of Early Interventions, 27, 15–26.
6.
TrivetteC. M.DunstC. J.HambyD. (2004) Sources of variation in and consequences of everyday activity settings on child and parenting functioning. Perspectives in Education, 22(2), 17–35.
