Reaction to “Comments on ‘The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange and Differential Treatment on Work Unit Commitment’: Distinguishing between Neutralizing and Moderating Effects”
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2004
Reaction to “Comments on ‘The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange and Differential Treatment on Work Unit Commitment’: Distinguishing between Neutralizing and Moderating Effects”
Ye and Barbuto in 2004 made a number of interesting observations about use in 2002 by Van Breukelen, Konst, and Van der Vlist of the term ‘neutralizer’. They advised caution when employing the term ‘neutralizer’, preferring instead the designation ‘moderator’. Their comments underscore the importance of discussion on the nature of interaction effects in studies of leadership. Here we clarify our procedures in more detail and present the results of further analyses of our data.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
2.
ArnoldH. J. (1982) Moderator variables: a clarification of conceptual, analytic and psychometric issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 143–174.
3.
ArnoldH. J. (1984) Testing moderator variable hypotheses: a reply to Stone and Hollenbeck. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 214–224.
4.
CohenJ.CohenP. (1983) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
HowellJ. P.DorfmanP. W.KerrS. (1986) Moderator variables in leadership research. Academy of Management Review, 11, 88–102.
6.
JaccardJ.TurrisiR.WanC. K. (1990) Interaction effects in multiple regression. London: Sage.
7.
Van BreukelenW.KonstD.Van der VlistR. (2002) Effects of LMX and differential treatment on work unit commitment. Psychological Reports, 91, 220–230.
8.
VillaJ. R.HowellJ. P.DorfmanP. W.DanielD. L. (2003) Problems with detecting moderators in leadership research using moderated multiple regression. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 3–23.
9.
YeX.BarbutoJ. E. (2004) Comments on “The effects of leader-member exchange and differential treatment on work unit commitment”: distinguishing between neutralizing and moderating effects. Psychological Reports, 94, 495–500.