This commentary focuses on three points of the Akama and Yamauchi paper (2004) that raise possibilities for research. These points regard (a) the nature of metacognitive experiences, (b) their relations with performance, and (c) their role in self-regulation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkamaK.YamauchiH. (2004) Task performance and metacognitive experiences in problem-solving. Psychological Reports, 94, 715–722.
2.
EfklidesA. (2001) Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: metacognition, motivation, and self-regulation. In EfklidesA.KuhlJ.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Pp. 297–323.
3.
EfklidesA.DinaF. (in press) Feedback from one's own self and from the others: their effect on affect. Hellenic Journal of Psychology.
4.
EfklidesA.SamaraA.PetropoulouM. (1999) Feeling of difficulty: an aspect of monitoring that influences control. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XIV, 461–476.
