Previous investigators have suggested that the personality variable tolerance for error is related to success in computational estimation. However, this suggestion has not been tested directly. This study examined the relationship between performance on a computational estimation test and scores on the NEO–Five Factor Inventory, a measure of the Big Five personality traits, including Openness, an index of tolerance for ambiguity. Other variables included SAT–I Verbal and Mathematics scores and self-rated mathematics ability. Participants were 65 college students. There was no significant relationship between the tolerance variable and computational estimation performance. There was a modest negative relationship between Agreeableness and estimation performance. The skepticism associated with the negative pole of the Agreeableness dimension may be important to pursue in further understanding of estimation ability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckermanP. L. (1996) A theory of adult intellectual development: process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257.
2.
AckermanP. L.HeggestadE. D. (1997) Intelligence, personality, and interests: evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.
3.
AllportG. W.OdbertH. S. (1936) Trait-names: a psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, No. 1 (Whole No. 211).
BeasleyT. M.LongJ. D.NataliM. (2001) A confirmatory factor analysis of the Mathematics Scale for Children. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 14–26.
6.
BraswellJ. S.LutkusA. D.GriggW. S.SantapauS. L.Tay-LimB.JohnsonM. (2001) The nation's report card: mathematics 2000. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
7.
CarrollJ. B. (1993) Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor analytic strategies. New York: Cambridge.
8.
CarusoJ. C. (2000) Reliability generalization and the NEO personality scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 236–254.
9.
CattellR. B. (1943) The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476–506.
10.
CattellR. B. (1945) The principal trait clusters for describing personality. Psychological Bulletin, 42, 129–161.
11.
CohenJ. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
ConnS. R.RiekeM. L. (1994) The 16PF Fifth Edition technical manual. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
13.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1992) NEO PI–R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14.
DigmanJ. M. (1990) Personality structure: the emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.
15.
DominoG. (1997) Psychological testing: an introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16.
DowkerA. (1992) Computational estimation strategies of professional mathematicians. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 45–55.
17.
DowkerA.FloodA.GriffithsH.HarrissL.HookL. (1996) Estimation strategies of four groups. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 113–133.
18.
GoffM.AckermanP. L. (1992) Personality-intelligence relations: assessment of typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537–552.
19.
GoldbergL. R. (1981) Language and individual differences: the search for universals in personality lexicons. In WheelerL. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 141–165.
20.
GoldbergL. R. (1993) The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.
21.
GrazianoW. G.EisenbergN. (1997) Agreeableness: a dimension of personality. In HoganR.JohnsonJ.BriggsS. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pp. 795–825.
22.
HansonS. A.HoganT. P. (2000) Computational estimation skill of college students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 483–499.
23.
HembreeR. (1990) The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33–46.
24.
HoH.SenturkD.LamA. G.ZimmerJ. M.HongS.OkamotoY.ChiuS.NakazawaY.PengC. (2000) The affective and cognitive dimensions of math anxiety: a cross-national study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 362–379.
25.
HoganT. P. (1977) Students' interests in particular mathematics topics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8, 115–122.
26.
HoganT. P.BrezinskiK. L. (2003) Quantitative estimation: one, two, or three abilities?Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5, 259–280.
27.
HornJ. (1988) Thinking about human abilities. In NesselroadeJ. R.CattellR. B. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. (2nd ed.) New York: Plenum. Pp. 645–686.
28.
JandaL. H. (1998) Psychological testing: theory and applications. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
29.
KöllerO.BaumertJ.SchnabelK. (2001) Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 448–470.
30.
LeFevreJ. A.GreenhamS. L.WaheedN. (1993) The development of procedural and conceptual knowledge in computational estimation. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 95–132.
31.
LevineD. R. (1982) Strategy use and estimation ability of college students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11, 350–359.
32.
MaX.KishorN. (1997) Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: a meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 26–47.
33.
MarshH. W.CravenR.DebusR. (1999) Separation of competency and affect components of multiple dimensions of academic self-concept: a developmental perspective. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 567–601.
34.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (1997) Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In HoganR.JohnsonJ.BriggsS. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pp. 826–848.
35.
MitchellJ. H.HawkinsE. F.StancavageF. B.DosseyJ. A. (1999) Estimation skills, mathematics-in-context, and advanced skills in mathematics: results from three studies of the National Assessment of Educational Progress 1996 mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
36.
MullisI. V.MartinM. O.GonzalesE. J.GregoryK. D.GardenR. A.O'ConnorK. M.ChrostowskiS. J.SmithT. A. (2000) TIMSS 1999 international mathematics report. Boston, MA: International Study Center, Boston College.
37.
MurphyK. R.MyorsB. (1998) Statistical power analysis: a simple and general model for traditional and modern hypothesis tests. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38.
ReyesL. H. (1984) Affective variables and mathematics education. The Elementary School Journal, 84, 558–581.
39.
ReysR. E.BestgenB. J.RyboltJ. F.WyattJ. W. (1980) Identification and characterization of computational estimation processes used by inschool pupils and out-of-school adults. (Final Report, National Institute of Education, Grant No. NIE 79-0088)
40.
ReysR. E.BestgenB. J.RyboltJ. F.WyattJ. W. (1982) Processes used by good computational estimators. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 183–201.
41.
RombergT. A.KaputJ. J. (1999) Mathematics worth teaching, mathematics worth understanding. In FennemaE.RombergT. A. (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 3–17.
42.
RubensteinR. (1985) Computational estimation and related mathematical skills. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 106–119.
43.
SowderJ. (1989) Affective factors and computational estimation ability. In McLeodD. B.AdamsV. M. (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: a new perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag. Pp. 177–191.
44.
SowderJ. (1992a) Estimation and number sense. In GrouwsD. A. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan. Pp. 371–389.
45.
SowderJ. (1992b) Making sense of numbers in school mathematics. In LeinhardtG.PutnamR.HattrupR. A. (Eds.), Analysis of arithmetic for mathematics teaching. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 1–51.
46.
SowderJ.WheelerM. M. (1989) The development of concepts and strategies used in computational estimation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 130–146.
47.
StanicG. M.HartL. E. (1995) Attitudes, persistence, and mathematics achievement: qualifying race and sex differences. In SecadaW. G.FennemaE.AdajianL. B. (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge. Pp. 258–276.
48.
WigginsJ. S.TrapnellP. D. (1997) Personality structure: the return of the big five. In HoganR.JohnsonJ.BriggsS. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pp. 737–766.
