Amount of agreement among readers about the relevant information in a self-help psychology book was measured to assess whether readers' choices are unique or overlapping. 15 men and 14 women attended two 1-hr. sessions in which they read and marked relevant information in the first 60 pages of a self-help psychology book. Comparison of the amount and pattern of marking across pages and lines on five specific pages showed that there was a statistically significant amount of agreement on which pages contained relevant ideas and which lines contained important concepts. There were no differences between men and women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlanchardJ.MikkelsonV. (1987) Underlining performance outcomes in expository text. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 197–201.
2.
CioffiG. (1986) Relationships among comprehension strategies reported by college students. Reading Research and Instruction, 25, 220–232.
3.
DaleR.ReiterE. (1995) Computational interpretations of the Gricean maxims in the generation of referring expression. Cognitive Science, 18, 233–263.
4.
ForestJ. J.Del BenK.ToewsS. (in press) Agreement between readers on what is relevant in self-help psychology books. Psychological Reports.
5.
KraminerW. (1992) I'm dysfunctional, you're dysfunctional. New York: Addison-Wesley.
6.
SiegelS. (1956) Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
SimondsW. (1992) Women and self-help culture: reading between the lines. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Press.
8.
SmithM. J. (1975) When I say no I feel guilty. New York: Bantam Books.
9.
SPSS, Inc. (1994) SPSS professional statistics 6.1. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.
10.
StarkerS. (1989) Oracle at the supermarket. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
11.
ThurmanC. (1996) Self-help or self-destruction. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.
12.
TurnerG. Y. (1992) College students' self-awareness of study behaviors. College Student Journal, 26, 129–134.
