Psychometric examination of the Beck Depression Inventory–II has been adequate and varied for outpatient and nonclinical samples, but is still comparatively scant for inpatient psychiatric samples. In particular, important factor analytic questions have not been assessed on inpatient samples at all. Given that over time alone (regardless of symptom change) test scores on depression measures can spuriously drop, a convergent psychometric analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory–II was undertaken with a new measure of depression severity, the Grossman-Cole Depression Inventory. A sample of 101 psychiatric inpatients was administered both tests. Item and scale level psychometrics were reviewed for each measure. Results were highly consistent with previous findings, providing support for the use of the Beck Depression Inventory–II with inpatient samples. Moreover, the new inventory performed quite well, suggesting it has promise as another measure for self-reported depression symptom severity. The Beck Depression Inventory–II appears appropriately considered as a single-factor hierarchical measure of depression with the current inpatient sample. Moreover, the Grossman-Cole Depression Inventory is related enough to the Beck inventory to provide adequate similarity without being so similar the measures duplicate each other.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (4th ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
AndersonT. W.RubinH. (1956) Statistical inference in factor analysis. Proceedings from the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 5, 111–150.
4.
AtkinsonB. M.CalhounK. S.RessickP.EllisE. M. (1982) Victims of rape: Repeated assessment of depressive symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 96–102.
5.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BallR.RanieriW. (1996) Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories–IA and –II in psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 588–597.
6.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BrownG. K. (1996) Beck Depression Inventory manual. (2nd ed.) San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
7.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.GarbinM. G. (1988) Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.
8.
BeckA. T.WardC. H.MendelsonM.MockJ.ErbaughJ. (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.
9.
BerkmanL. F.BerkmanC. S.KaslS.FreemanD. H.LeoL.OstfeldA. M.Cornoni-HuntlyJ.BrodyJ. A. (1986) Depressive symptoms in relation to physical health and functioning in the elderly. American Journal of Epidemiology, 124, 372–388.
10.
BoomsmaA. (1982) The robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11.
BriggsS. R.CheekJ. M. (1986) The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54, 106–148.
12.
BuckleyT. C.ParkerJ. D.HeggieJ. (2001) A psychometric evaluation of the BDI–II in treatment-seeking substance abusers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 20, 197–204.
13.
CharterR. A. (2003) Studies are using samples too small to produce sufficiently precise reliability coefficients. The Journal of General Psychology, 130, 117–129.
14.
CharterR. A.FeldtL. S. (2002) The importance of reliability as it relates to true score confidence intervals. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35, 104–112.
15.
ChoquetteK. A.HesselbrockM. N. (1987) Effects of retesting with the Beck and Zung depression scales in alcoholics. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 22, 277–283.
CohenJ. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
CohenJ. (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
19.
ColeJ. C. (2002) Validation of a Rasch-derived short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies–Depression (CES–D) scale. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 2577. (UMI No. 3053594)
20.
ColeJ. C. (submitted) Structural comparison of the Boston and Cole CES–D short forms.
21.
ColeJ. C.MotivalaS. J.DangJ.LuckoA.LangN.LevinM.OxmanM. N.IrwinM. R. (in press) Structural validation of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment.
22.
ColeJ. C.RabinA. S.SmithT. L.KaufmanA. S. (in press) Development and validation of a Rasch-derived CES–D short form. Psychological Assessment.
23.
ComreyA. L. (1988) Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 754–761.
24.
ComreyA. L.LeeH. B. (1992) A first course in factor analysis. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
CortinaJ. M. (1993) What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.
26.
CostelloC. G. (1982) Social factors associated with depression: A retrospective community study. Psychological Medicine, 12, 329–339.
27.
DozoisD. J. A.DobsonK. S.AhnbergJ. L. (1998) Psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory–II. Psychological Assessment, 10, 83–89.
28.
FanX.ThompsonB. (2001) Confidence intervals about score reliability coefficients. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 517–531.
29.
FloydF. J.WidamanK. F. (1995) Factor analysis in the development of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.
30.
GibbonsR. D.ClarkD. C.KupperD. J. (1993) Exactly what does the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale measure?Journal of Psychiatric Research, 27, 259–273.
31.
GreenB. F. (1978) In defense of measurement. American Psychologist, 33, 664–670.
32.
GreenS. B.LissitzR. W.MulaikS. A. (1977) Limitations of coefficient alpha as an index of test unidimensionality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 827–838.
33.
GuadagnoliE.VelicerW. F. (1988) Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265–275.
34.
HambletonR. K.SwaminathanH.RogersH. J. (1991) Fundamentals of items response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
HaynesS. N.RichardD. C. S.KubanyE. S. (1995) Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238–247.
36.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
37.
KeithT. Z. (1997) Using confirmatory factor analysis to aid in understanding the constructs measured by intelligence tests. In FlanaganD. P.GenshaftJ. L.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Beyond intellectual assessment: Contemporary and emerging theories, tests and issues. New York: Guilford. Pp. 373–395.
38.
KendallP. C.HollonS. D.BeckA. T.HammenC. L. (1987) Issues and recommendations regarding use of the Beck Depression Inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 289–299.
39.
KrefetzD. G.SteerR. A.GulabN. A.BeckA. T. (2002) Convergent validity of the Beck Depression Inventory–II with the Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale in psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 451–460.
40.
LinacreJ. M.WrightB. D. (1999) WINSTEPS Rasch-model computer program (Version 2.88). Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
41.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994) Psychometric theory. (3rd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
42.
OsmanA.DownsW. R.BarriosW. R.FranciscoX.KopperB. A. (1997) Factor structure and psychometric characteristics of the Beck Depression Inventory–II. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 19, 359–376.
43.
RadloffL. S. (1977) The CES–D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 384–401.
44.
RaschG. (1960) Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Den.: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
45.
RegierD. A.BoydJ. H.BurkeJ. D. J.RaeD. S.MyersJ. K.KramerM.RobinsL. N.GeorgeL. K.KarnoM.LockeB. Z. (1988) One-month prevalence of mental disorders in the United States. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 977–986.
46.
ReynoldsW. W. (1987) Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
47.
SchumackerR. E.LomaxR. G. (1996) A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
SharpeJ. P.GilbertD. G. (1998) Effects of repeated administration of the Beck Depression Inventory and other measures of negative mood states. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 457–463.
49.
SPSS, Inc. (2002) SPSS for Windows (Version 11.5.0). New York: SPSS, Inc.
50.
tatsoft, Inc. (1999) Statistica for Windows (Version 5.5A). Tulsa, OK: Statsoft, Inc.
51.
SteerR. A.BallR.RanieriW. F.BeckA. T. (1997) Further evidence for the construct validity of the Beck Depression Inventory–II with psychiatric outpatients. Psychological Reports, 80, 443–446.
52.
SteerR. A.BallR.RanieriW. F.BeckA. T. (1999) Dimensions of the Beck Depression Inventory–II in clinically depressed outpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 117–128.
53.
SteerR. A.BeckA. T. (2000) The Beck Depression Inventory–II. In CraigheadW. E.NemeroffC. B. (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of psychology and behavioral science. Vol. 1. (3rd ed.) New York: Wiley. Pp. 178–179.
54.
SteerR. A.KumarG.RanieriW. F.BeckA. T. (1998) Use of the Beck Depression Inventory–II with adolescent psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 20, 127–137.
55.
SteerR. A.RissmillerD. J.BeckA. T. (2000) Use of the Beck Depression Inventory–II with depressed geriatric inpatients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 311–318.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (1996) Using multivariate statistics. (2nd ed.) New York: HarperCollins.
58.
TanakaJ. S.HubaG. J. (1984a) Confirmatory hierarchical analyses of measures of psychological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 621–635.
59.
TanakaJ. S.HubaG. J. (1984b) Structures of psychological distress: Testing confirmatory hierarchical models. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 719–721.
60.
ThompsonB. (1997) The importance of structure coefficients in the structural equation modeling confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 5–19.
61.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1999) Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health.
62.
WrightB. D.LinacreJ. M. (1997) A user's guide to Bigsteps: A Rasch-model computer program. (2.77 ed.) Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
63.
WrightB. D.StoneM. H. (1979) Best test design: Rasch measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
64.
ZichJ. M.AttkissonC. C.GreenfieldT. K. (1990) Screening for depression in primary care clinics: The CES–D and the BDI. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 20, 259–277.
65.
ZungW. K. (1965) A self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 12, 63–70.
