The importance of the separation-individuation process in object relations theory is well known in disciplines of psychology, counseling, and human development. Based on the Separation-individuation Inventory of Christenson and Wilson, which measures the manifestations of disturbances in this process, a Chinese version of the inventory was developed. For college students Cronbach coefficient alpha was .89, and test-retest reliability over 28 days was .77. The scores of the inventory had positive correlations with both the number of borderline personality characteristics and the Individualism-Collectivism Scale, respectively. Also, the mean score on the inventory of patients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder was significantly higher than that of the two normal control groups (ns = 564). Thus the inventory possessed satisfactory construct validity. Cultural differences regarding the separation-individuation process need to be investigated further.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenS. F.StoltenbergC. D. (1995) Psychological separation of old adolescents and young adults from their parents: an investigation of gender differenceJournal of Counseling and Development, 73, 542–546.
2.
BenjaminL. S. (1993) Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders. New York: Guilford.
3.
BlosP. (1967) The second individuation process of adolescence. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 22, 75–84.
4.
BlusteinD. L.WalbridgeM. M.FriedlanderM. L.PalladinoD. E. (1991) Contributions of psychological separation and parental attachment to the career development process. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 39–50.
5.
ChristensonR. M.WilsonW. P. (1985) Assessing pathology in the separation-individuation process by an inventory: a preliminary report. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173, 561–565.
6.
DolanB. M.EvansC.NortonK. (1992) The Separation-Individuation Inventory: association with borderline phenomena. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180, 529–533.
7.
EsmanA. H. (1980) Adolescent psychopathology and the rapprochement phenomenon. Adolescent Psychiatry, 37, 74–78.
8.
HolmbeckG. N.McClanahanG. (1994) Construct and content validity of the Separation-Individuation Test of Adolescence: a reply to Levine. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 169–172.
9.
HolmbeckG. N.WandreiM. L. (1993) Individuation and relational predictor of adjustment in first-year college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 73–78.
10.
HuiC. H. (1988) Measurement of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 17–36.
11.
KernbergO. (1984) Severe personality disorders. New Haven, CT: Yale Univer. Press.
12.
KrogerJ. (1996) Identity in adolescence: the balance between self and other. (2nd ed.) London: Routledge.
13.
KrogerJ. (1998) Adolescence as a second separation-individuation process: critical review of an object relations approach. In SkoeE.von der LippeA. (Eds.), Personality development in adolescence. London: Routledge. Pp. 172–192.
14.
KrogerJ.GreenK. (1994) Factor analytic structure and stability of the Separation-Individuation Test of Adolescence. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 772–785.
15.
LapsleyD. K.RiceK. G.ShadidG. E. (1989) Psychological separation and adjustment to college. Journal of Counseling Psychology36, 286–294.
16.
LevineJ. B. (1994) On McClanahan and Holmbeck's construct validity study of the Separation-Individuation Test of Adolescence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 166–168.
17.
LevineJ. B.GreenC. J.MillonT. (1986) The Separation-Individuation Test of Adolescence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 123–137.
18.
LevineJ. B.SaintongeS. (1993) Psychometric properties of the Separation-Individuation Test of Adolescence within a clinical population. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 492–507.
19.
LiM. (1992) Cultural differences and ingroup favoritism: a comparison of Chinese and American college students. Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 73, 153–190.
20.
LopezF. G.WatkinsC. E.Jr.ManusM.Hunton-ShoupJ. (1992) Conflictual independence, mood regulation, and generalized self-efficacy: test of a model of late-adolescent identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 375–381.
21.
MahlerM.PineF.BergmanA. (1975) The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.
22.
MastersonJ. F. (1976) Psychotherapy of the borderline adult. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
23.
MastersonJ. F. (1981) The narcissistic and borderline disorders: an integrated developmental approach. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
24.
McClanahanG.HolmbeckG. N. (1992) Separation-individuation, family functioning, and psychological adjustment in college students: a construct validity study of the Separation-Individuation Test of Adolescence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 59, 468–485.
25.
McDevittJ. B.MahlerM. S. (1981) Object constancy, individuality, and internalization. In GreenspanS. I.PollockG. H. (Eds.), The course of life, infancy and early childhood. New York: International Universities Press. Pp. 395–406.
26.
Palladino SchultheissD. E.BlusteinD. L. (1994a) Contributions of family relationship factors to the identity formation process. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 159–166.
27.
Palladino SchultheissD. E.BlusteinD. L. (1994b) Role of adolescent-parent relationships in college student development and adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 248–255.
28.
SchneiderS. (1992) Separation and individuation issues in psychological rehabilitation. Adolescence, 27, 137–144.
29.
ShiahY-J.TamW-C. C.ChiangS-K. (1998) Relations between separation-individuation process and personality of college students. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Chinese Psychological Association, Taipei, Taiwan, September.
30.
SloteW. H. (1992) Oedipal ties and the issue of the separation-individuation in traditional Confucian societies. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 20, 435–453.
31.
TamW-C. C.ShiahY-J.ChiangS-K. (2000) Separation-individuation process: case studies in Taiwan. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Counseling, San Jose, Costa Rica, June.
32.
TangN. M. (1992) Some psychoanalytic implications of Chinese philosophy and child-rearing practices. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 47, 371–389.
33.
TriandisH. C.BontempoR.BetancourtH.BondM.LeungK.BrenesA.GeorgasJ.HuiC. H.MarinG.SetiadiB.SinhaJ. B. P.VermaJ.SpangenbergJ.TouzardH.de MontmollinG. (1986) The measurement of etic aspects of individualism and collectivism across cultures. Australian Journal of Psychology, 38, 257–267.
