The Global Assessment of Functioning Scale is a widely used although poorly researched measurement of overall mental health or illness. This study investigated construct validity for clients with anxiety disorder. Analysis suggests that current suicidality was the most significant predictor of ratings. Current homicidality, work/school problems, and inability to care for oneself were not significantly correlated with scale ratings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000) The diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders. (4th ed., Rev.) Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BeckA. T.BrownG. K.SteerR. A. (1997) Psychometric characteristics of the scale for suicide ideation with psychiatric outpatients. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 35, 1039–1046.
3.
DradkehT. K.SaadA. (1995) WHO/DAS or APA/GAF: A difficult choice. Arab Journal of Psychiatry, 6, 93–98.
4.
GarrisonW. B. (2001) Exploring paths to Global Assessment of Functioning Scale scores: A naturalistic investigation of psychoanalytic treatment. (Adelphi Univer.)Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Science and Engineering, 61, May, 2001.
5.
GoldmanH. H.SkodolA. E.LaveT. R. (1992) Revising Axis III for DSM-IV: A review of measures of social functioning. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 1148–1156.
6.
JonesS. H.ThornicraftG.CoffeyM.DunnG. (1995) A brief mental health outcome scale: Reliability and validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). British Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 654–659.
7.
MoosR. H.McCoyL.MoosB. S. (2000) Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) ratings: Determinants and role as predictors of one-year treatment outcomes. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 440–441.
8.
PattersonD. A.LeeM-S. (1995) Field trial of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale-Modified. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 1386–1388.
9.
PiersmaH. L.BoesJ. L. (1997) The GAF and psychiatric outcome: A descriptive report. Community Mental Health Journal, 33, 35–41.
10.
Roy-ByrneP.DagadakisC.UnutzerJ.RiesR. (1996) Evidence for limited validity of the revised Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. Psychiatric Services, 47, 864–866.
11.
SchwartzR. C. (1999) Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment Rating Scale. Psychological Reports, 84, 389–391.
12.
WardJ. C.DowM. G. (1994) The Functional Assessment Rating Scale. (Florida Mental Health Institute) Tampa, FL: Univer. of South Florida, Department of Community Mental Health.
