The relation between the two religiosity dimensions which Wulff (1997) described (Exclusion vs Inclusion of Transcendence and Literal vs Symbolic) and two conservative political ideologies (Cultural and Economic Conservatism) was investigated in a sample of 714 students, a heterogeneous sample of 262 adults, and a sample of 301 religiously affiliated adults gathered in Flanders (Belgium). Both Exclusion vs Inclusion of Transcendence and Literal vs Symbolic were expected to relate only to Cultural Conservatism. Analysis supported these hypotheses, providing further evidence for the close association between religiosity and Cultural Conservatism and the validity of the Post-Critical Belief scale as a measure of Wulff's dimensions of religiosity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrownL. B. (1981) The religionism factor after 25 years. Journal of Psychology, 107, 7–10.
2.
ComreyA. L.NewmeyerJ. A. (1965) Measurement of radicalism-conservatism. Journal of Social Psychology, 67, 357–369.
3.
CrownlD PMarloweD. (1960) A new scale of social desirability independent of pathologyJournal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
4.
DesimpllaereP.SulasF.DuriezB.HutsebautD. (1999) Psycho-epistemological styles and religious beliefs. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9, 125–137.
5.
De WitteH. (1990) Conformisme, radicalisme en machteloosheid: Eeen onderzoek naar de sociaal-culturele en sociaal-economische opvattingen van arbeiders in Vlaanderen [Conformism, radicalism and powerlessness: Examining Flemish workers' socio-cultural and socio-economical opinions]. Leuven: HTVA.
6.
De WitteH.ScheepersP. (Eds.) (1999) Ideology in the low countries: Trends, models and lacunae. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
7.
DuriezB. (in press) Vivisecting the religious mind: Religiosity and motivated social cognition. Mental Health, Religion & Culture.
8.
DuriezB.FontaineJ. R. J.HutsebautD. (2000) A further elaboration of the Post-Critical Belief scale: Evidence for the existence of four different approaches to religion in Flanders-Belgium. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 153–181.
9.
DuriezB.LuytenP.SnauwaertB.HutsebautD. (2002) The importance of religiosity and values in predicting political attitudes: Evidence for the continuing importance of religion in Flanders (Belgium). Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 5(1), 35–54.
10.
DuriezB.SoenensB. (submitted) Religiosity, identity styles and the five factor model of personality: An integrative study among late adolescents in Flanders (Belgium).
11.
EysenckH. J. (1944) General social attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 207–227.
12.
EysenckH. J. (1954) The psychology of politics. London: Routledge.
13.
EysenckH. J. (1971) Personality and social attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 243–248.
14.
FergusonL. W. (1939) Primary social attitudes. Journal of Psychology, 8, 217–223.
15.
FergusonL. W. (1940) The measurement of primary social attitudes. Journal of Psychology, 10, 199–205.
16.
FergusonL. W. (1973) Primary social attitudes of the 1960s and those of the 1930s. Psychological Reports, 33, 655–664.
17.
FontaineJ. R. J.DuriezB.LuytenP.HutsebautD. (in press) The internal structure of the Post-Critical Belief scale. Personality and Individual Differences.
18.
GorsuchR. L. (1984) Measurement: The boon and bane of investigating religion. American Psychologist, 39, 228–236.
19.
GorsuchR. L.McFarlandS. G. (1972) Single vs. multiple item scales for measuring religious values. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 53–64.
20.
GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonSRosenblattA.VeederM.KirklandS.LyonD. (1990) Evidence for terror management theory: II. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308–318.
21.
InglehartR. (1990) Cultural shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer. Press.
22.
JohnsonS. D.TamneyJ. B. (2001) Social traditionalism and economic conservatism: Two conservative political ideologies in the United States. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 233–243.
23.
JostJ.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W. (in press) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin.
24.
KemmelmeierM. (1997) Need for closure and political orientation among German university students. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 787–789.
25.
KossowskaM.Van HielA. (in press) The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in Western and Eastern Europe. Political Psychology.
26.
LipsetS. M. (1960) Political man: Social bases of politics. New York: Doubleday.
27.
LipsetS. M. (1981) Political man: The social basis of politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univer. Press.
28.
McCloskyH. (1958) Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review, 53, 27–45.
29.
MiddendorpC. (1978) Progressiveness and conservatism: The fundamental dimensions of ideological controversy and weir relationship to social class. New York: Mouton.
30.
MiddendorpC. (1991) Ideology in Dutch politics: The democratic system reconsidered 1970–1985. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
31.
RokeachM. (1973) The nature of human values. New YorkFree Press.
32.
SaniaM. (1952) An empirical study of political, religious and social attitudes. British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section, 5(2), 81–92.
33.
SaucierG. (2000) Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 366–385.
34.
SayerD. (1991) Capitalism and modernity: An excursus on Marx and Weber. New York: Routledge.
35.
ShahJ. Y.KruglanskiA. W.ThompsonE. P. (1998) Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: Need for closure effects on ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 383–393.
36.
TetlockP. E. (1983) Cognitive style and political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 118–126.
37.
TetlockP. E. (1993) Cognitive structural analysis of political rhetoric: Methodological and theoretical issues. In IyengarS.McGuireW. J. (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology. Durham, NC: Duke Univer. Press. Pp. 380–405.
38.
ThurstoneL. L. (1934) The vectors of mind. Psychological Review, 41, 1–32.
39.
Van HielA.PandelaereM.DuriezB. (submitted) The impact of motivated social cognition on conservative beliefs and racism: Comparing the predictive power of authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and need for closure.
40.
WalkeyF. H.KatzY. J.GreenD. E. (1990) The general factor in the Conservatism Scale: A multinational-multicultural examination. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 985–988.
41.
WeberM. (1930) The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribners.
42.
WilsonG. D. (1970) Is there a general factor in social attitudes? Evidence from a factor analysis of the Conservatism Scale. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 101–107.
43.
WulffD. M. (1997) Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary. New York: Wiley.
