The work of Huitema (1985) on autocorrelation in behavioral data suggests that the use of conventional statistical methods is justified. The present study restates the problem of autocorrelation by analyzing 100 baselines of small samples designs published in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis during 1992. The results show a negative bias in the autocorrelations, especially with very small samples. The autocorrelation values are normally distributed, and the method of Davies, Trigg, and Newbold (1977) is the most accurate in calculating the standard deviation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonN. H. (2001) Empirical direction in design and analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
BartlettM. S. (1946) On the theoretical specification of the sampling properties of autocorrelated time-series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 8, 27–41.
3.
DaviesN.TriggsC. M.NewboldP. (1977) Significance levels of the Box-Pierce portmanteau statistic in finite samples. Biometrika, 64, 517–522.
4.
DixonW. J. (Ed.) (1992) BMDP statistical software manual. Vol. 1. Berkeley, CA: Univer. of California Press.
5.
HuitemaB. E. (1985) Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: A myth. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 107–118.
6.
HuitemaB. E. (1986) Autocorrelation in behavior modification data: Wherefore art thou? In PolingA.FuquaR. W. (Eds.), Research methods in applied behavior analysis: Issues and advances. New York: Plenum. Pp. 187–208.
7.
HuitemaB. E. (1988) Autocorrelation: 10 years of confusion. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 253–294.
8.
HuitemaB. E.McKeanJ. W. (1991) Autocorrelation estimation and inference with small samples. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 291–304.
9.
HuitemaB. E.McKeanJ. W. (1994a) Reduced bias autocorrelation estimation: Three jackknife methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 654–665.
10.
HuitemaB. E.McKeanJ. W. (1994b) Test of H0: ρ1 = 0 for autocorrelation estimators rF1 and rF2. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 331–336.
11.
HuitemaB. E.McKeanJ. W. (1994c) Two reduced-bias autocorrelation estimators: RF1 and rF2. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 323–330.
12.
HuitemaB. E.McKeanJ. W. (1996) Tests for the jackknife autocorrelation estimator rQ2. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 232–240.
13.
HuitemaB. E.McKeanJ. W. (1998) Irrelevant autocorrelation in least-squares intervention models. Psychological Methods, 3, 104–116.
14.
HuitemaB. E.McKeanJ. W. (2000a) Design specification issues in time-series intervention models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 38–58.
15.
HuitemaB. E.McKeanJ. W. (2000b) A simple and powerful test for autocorrelated errors in OLS intervention models. Psychological Reports, 87, 3–20.
16.
HuitemaB. E.McKeanJ. W.McKnightS. (1999) Autocorrelation effects on least-squares intervention analysis of short time series. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 767–786.
17.
HuitemaB. E.McKeanJ. W.ZhaoJ. (1996) The runs test for autocorrelated errors: Unacceptable properties. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 390–404.
18.
JonesR. R.VaughtR. S.WeinrottM. (1977) Time-series analysis in operant research. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 151–166.
19.
MatyasT. A.GreenwoodK. M. (1991) Problems in the estimation of autocorrelation in brief time series and some implications for behavioral data. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 137–157.
20.
McKeanJ. W.HuitemaB. E. (1993) Small sample properties of the Spearman autocorrelation estimator. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 384–386.
21.
McKnightS. D.McKeanJ. W.HuitemaB. E. (2000) A double bootstrap method to analyze linear models with autoregressive error terms. Psychological Methods, 5, 87–101.
22.
MoranP. A. P. (1948) Some theorems on time series: 2. The significance of the serial correlation coefficient. Biometrika, 35, 255–260.
23.
ShapiroS. S.WilkM. B. (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52, 591–611.
24.
SharpleyC. E.AlavosiusM. P. (1988) Autocorrelation in behavioral data: An alternative perspective. Behavioral Assessment10, 243–251.
25.
SuenH. K. (1987) On the epistemology of autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 113–124.
